Asset protection

The Coming Run on Banks and Pensions

Pension Grenade 16“There are folks that are saying you know what, I don’t care, I’m going to lock in my retirement now and get out while I can and fight it as a retiree if they go and change the retiree benefits,” he said.  – Executive Director for the Kentucky Association of State Employees,  Proposed Pension Changes Bring Fears Of State Worker Exodus

The public awareness of the degree to which State pension funds are underfunded has risen considerably over the past year.  It’s a problem that’s easy to hide as long as the economy is growing and State tax receipts grow.  It’s a catastrophe when the economic conditions deteriorate and tax revenue flattens or declines, as is occurring now.

The quote above references a report of a 20% jump in Kentucky State worker retirements in August after it was reported that a consulting group recommended that the State restructure its State pension system.   I personally know a teacher who left her job in order to cash completely out of her State employee pension account in Colorado (Colorado PERA).  She knows the truth.

 

But the problem with under-funding is significantly worse than reported.  Pensions are run like Ponzi schemes.  As long as the amount of cash coming in to the fund is equal to or exceeds beneficiary payouts, the scheme can continue.   But for years, due to poor investment decisions and Fed monetary policies, beneficiary payouts have been swamping investment returns and fund contributions.

Pension funds have notoriously over-marked their illiquid risky investments and understated their projected actuarial investment returns in order to hide the degree to which they are over-funded.  Most funds currently assume 7% to 8% future rates of return. Unfortunately, the ability to generate returns like that have been impossible with interest rates near zero.

In the quest to compensate for low fixed income returns, pension funds have plowed money into stocks, private equity funds and illiquid and very risky investments,  like subprime auto loan securities and commercial real estate.   Some pension funds have as much as 20% of their assets in private equity.  When the stock market inevitably cracks, it will wipe pensions out.

As an example of pensions over-estimating their future return calculations, the State of Minnesota adjusted the net present value of its future liabilities from 8% down to 4.6% (note:  this is the same as lowering its projected ROR from 8% to 4.6%).   The rate of under-funding went from 20% to 47%.

I can guarantee you with my life that if an independent auditor spent the time required to implement a bona fide market value mark-to-market on that fund’s illiquid assets, the amount of under-funding would likely jump up to at least 70%.  “Bona fide mark-to-market” means, “at what price will you buy this from me now with cash upfront?”

For instance, what is the true market price at which the fund could sell its private equity fund investments?   Harvard is trying to sell $2.5 billion in real estate and private equity investments.   The move was announced in May and there have not been any material updates since then other than a quick press release in early July that an investment fund was looking at the assets offered.  I would suggest that the bid for these assets is either lower than expected or non-existent other than a pennies on the dollar  “option value” bid.

At some point current pension fund beneficiaries are going to seek an upfront cash-out. If enough beneficiaries begin to inquire about this, it could trigger a run on pensions and drastic measures will be implemented to prevent this.

Similarly, per the sleuthing of Wolf Richter, ECB is seeking from the European Commission the authority to implement a moratorium on cash withdrawals from banks at its discretion. The only reason for this is concern over the precarious financial condition of the European banking system.  And it’s not just some cavalier Italian and Spanish banks.  I would suggest that Deutsche Bank, at any given moment, is on the ropes.

But make no mistake. The U.S. banks are in no better condition than their European counter-parts.  If Europe is moving toward enabling the ECB to close the bank windows ahead of an impending financial crisis, the Fed is likely already working on a similar proposal.

All it will take is an extended 10-20% draw-down in the stock market to trigger a massive run on custodial assets – pensions, banks and brokerages.  This includes the IRA’s.  I would suggest that one of the primary motivations behind the Fed/PPT’s  no-longer-invisible hand propping up the stock and fixed income markets is the knowledge of the pandemonium that will ensue if the stock market were allowed to embark on a true price discovery mission.

Like every other attempt throughout history to control the laws of economics and perpetuate Ponzi schemes, the current attempt by Central Banks globally will end with a spectacular collapse.   I would suggest that this is one of the driving forces underlying the repeated failure by the western Central Banks to drive the price of gold lower since mid-December 2015.   I would also suggest that it would be a good idea to keep as little of your wealth as possible tied up in banks and other financial “custodians.”   The financial system is one giant “Roach Motel” – you check your money in but eventually you’ll never get it out.

http://investmentresearchdynamics.com/

The Insanity in Korea – But Is it Logical?

Kim-Hydrogen-BombThe South China Post reported that Chinese scientists fear that a mountain in North Korea under which the last five bombs detonated as tests, may collapse crumbling into a crater. They fear that the radiation underground would then leak across region.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that the escalating crisis concerning North Korea’s weapons program is placing the world at risk of developing into a “global catastrophe” with massive casualties. Putin has UNREALISTICALLY said that the only way to resolve the crisis was through diplomacy. For that to be even a possibility, it requires talking. Kim Jong Un has not even met with the leader of China – its once closet Allies.

Let’s put this is perspective. Why is Kim pushing the world to the brink? Kim Jong Un looks at this differently He believes that the survival of his regime depends on possessing nuclear weapons. He is most likely NOT interested in starting a nuclear war for he cannot be so stupid to believe he would win. Yet, Kim also realizes that the prospect of the USA sending a nuke to North Korea is also not likely for that would antagonize China and risk pollution drifting to South Korea and Japan, not to mention China. So with all the saber rattling, Kim is not stupid and realizes that the USA cannot launch a first strike.

Now, why is the goal of Kim? To be honest, Kim Jong Un does not trust the USA for from the outsider perspective, he has watched how American intervention in Iraq ended in the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, his execution as well as family members, and left the country ravaged by war and a puppet of Washington. Obviously, Kim has made the determination that had Saddam truly possessed nuclear power then the USA would never have intervened. This logic is understandable for it creates the stalemate between USA, China, and Russia. The USA invading Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria with the objective of regime change creates the image that one must protect themselves and this is Kim’s perspective.

Sanctions will never work because Kim would starve his people before giving up his power. Also, as long as he appears to be strong, then there is little risk of an internal coup. If he backs down and appears weak, the prospect of being overthrown becomes probable from within.

…also from Martin: Market Talk- September 5th, 2017

Eight Days to Destruction

Harvey made landfall as a Category 4 Hurricane on August 25. The wind and flooding caused massive destruction. The news mentioned one hundred billion dollars as a preliminary estimate of the damage.

Eight days before on August 17 Harvey became a named storm. There was no apparent cause for alarm on August 17.

Two days later it was upgraded to a tropical depression. Harvey reached hurricane strength on August 24. Much can happen in eight days.

 

  • August 17: Harvey is named
  • August 21: Total eclipse of the sun. The path crossed the contiguous 48 states. Read “Total Eclipse of Sense.”
  • August 21: President Trump announces a revised and renewed war effort in Afghanistan.
  • August 25: Category 4 Harvey makes landfall, destroys buildings and dumps trillions of gallons of water on Texas. Houston, the 4th largest city in the U.S. flooded in many areas.

 

word-image-28

MUCH CAN CHANGE IN 8 DAYS!

SO WHAT?

 

  • Are you prepared for drastic changes in your physical environment? Harvey, Katrina, Rita, and 9-11 show that our world changes, sometimes in deadly ways.
  • Are you prepared financially? What will a stock or bond market crash do to your life style and retirement plans? Given their extreme valuations, a crash is possible.
  • In 2008 we experienced a credit crunch, a destructive event because the economic world depends upon credit. It could happen again.
  • The U.S. dollar is the world’s reserve currency. The U.S. military and the petrodollar support that status. Change is coming.

 

CONSIDER PAST CHANGES IN 8 DAYS

Gold Market: From January 21, 1980 to January 28, 1980, (seven days) the price of gold dropped from a high of $873 to a low of $607. Down 30%!

DOW Index: From October 12, 1987 to October 20, 1987, the DOW dropped from a high of 2,505 to a low of 1,616. Down 36%!

NASDAQ 100 Index: From March 27, 2000 to April 4, 2000, the NASDAQ 100 dropped from a high of 4,781 to a low of 3,525. Down 26%!

9-11 Attack: Three buildings collapsed at “free-fall” speeds after being hit by two airliners. An official story was created, but let’s not quibble about details. The United States was a different environment eight days after 9-11.

S&P 500 Index: From October 2, 2008 to October 10, 2008, the S&P 500 Index dropped from a high of 1,160 to a low of 840. Down 27%!

Hurricane Harvey: A category 4 hurricane was a tiny storm only eight days earlier. Houston will recover and rebuild for eight months, or perhaps eight years following the incredible flooding. Houston, you have a problem!

Yes, much can happen in only eight days.

According to Charles Hugh Smith, “Next Stop, Recession: The Financial Meteor Storm is Headed Our Way

“The next recession – which I suggested yesterday has just begun – will be more than a business-cycle downturn; it will be a devastating meteor storm that destroys huge chunks of the economy while leaving other sectors virtually untouched.”

His description of coming economic destruction parallels the devastation in Houston. If you live in the flood zones, you’ll see vast destruction. Higher areas will get rained on but could be virtually untouched by the massive destruction.

WHAT CAN WE DO TO PREPARE FOR FINANCIAL STORMS?

  1. Self-reliance. Find your own answers.
  2. Possess real money. Don’t depend entirely upon the debt based digital and paper stuff that can vanish as quickly as a Cadillac in a Houston flood.
  3. Minimize counter-party risk and off-load assets that will be destroyed in a credit crunch, debt reset, dollar devaluation, or crash in the purchasing power of the dollar.
  4. Possess assets that will be less affected by counter-party risk, a credit crunch, and massive inflation in the supply of dollars. Gold and silver come to mind.

Find your own answers. This story went viral. “Dog Carrying A Bag of Food

Otis (the dog) relied upon himself, knew what he needed, and did what was necessary. A bag of food was his “gold” in the storm.

Gary Christenson

The Deviant Investor

11 Opportunities in Gold, Uranium and Diamonds

Former journalist James Kwantes, editor of Resource Opportunities, provides a tour of promising junior mining opportunities, from the extremes of northern Canada to the tropics of French Guiana.

The Gold Report: The U.S. stock market has been in a bull run for a number of years. What are your thoughts on the market and what it means for precious metals?

James Kwantes: Since Donald Trump was elected president, but also for years before that, large-cap U.S. stocks have been a “can’t miss” for investors, who have been rewarded for chasing returns. It seems very toppy to me, but that doesn’t mean it couldn’t go on for a while still. In 2000, in the big tech boom, the market caps of the two or three largest technology companies equaled the market cap of something like every mining company in the world. We’re at that level again. We’re starting to see weakness in the U.S. dollar, and that’s positive for gold. These things are cyclical. Gold looks like it’s ready for the next longer-term breakout and we’re heading into a period of seasonal strength. We’re starting to see signs of strength in the junior market as well.

TGR: Would you talk about a couple of companies that you like in the precious metals area? 

JK: Let’s start with the Yukon, where I recently did some site visits. When you fly into the Yukon, you see placer mining operations, where miners pull gold out of the rivers and the gravels. They look like big gravel pits from the air, and some of the operations are very large. Placer mining is a big industry in the Yukon—about 20 million ounces (20 Moz) of placer gold has been pulled out since the Klondike Gold Rush days in the late 1890s—but the Yukon has never really had a large bedrock gold mine. So the hard-rock source for all that gold is a kind of holy grail in the Klondike.

Last year, Goldcorp Inc. (G:TSX; GG:NYSE) bought Kaminak Gold Corp. and its Coffee project for $520 million. That sparked another gold rush, an exploration rush, that is seeing many of the world’s largest gold mining companies do joint venture deals with companies that have Yukon projects.

TGR: What are some of the companies you are excited about in the Yukon?

JK: There’s an interesting company called Klondike Gold Corp. (KG:TSX.V). It owns a large land position around Dawson, the epicenter of the Klondike Gold Rush, that includes some of the most productive placer mining creeks where a lot of gold is still being pulled out. Klondike Gold owns the claims above many of the best creeks. 

Klondike is systematically exploring an area called Lone Star, which was the site of one of the only historical bedrock gold mines that produced high-grade gold. Klondike has hit about 2 kilometers (2 km) of gold mineralization along a structure that CEO Peter Tallman thinks may continue for as long as 7 km. 

I like Klondike for several reasons. It’s very close to Dawson City, so its costs of drilling are very low. And in the Yukon that’s important. A lot of these companies require helicopters to get in and out, which is expensive. Klondike has great backing. Frank Giustra, the co-founder of Goldcorp and founder of Lionsgate Films, is a major shareholder. So is Francesco Aquilini, another Vancouver-based billionaire whose family owns the Vancouver Canucks hockey team. So Klondike has some deep-pocketed shareholders and a plan to home in on an area with lots of gold mineralization. I really like its prospects for this year.

TGR: What’s another company in the Yukon that you like?

JK: Arcus Development Group Inc. (ADG:TSX.V), a small company that is under the radar. The CEO, Ian Talbot, is a geologist and a lawyer, and was BHP Billiton Ltd.’s (BHP:NYSE; BHPLF:OTCPK) lawyer out of its Vancouver office. Arcus owns a land position directly north of Goldcorp’s Coffee deposit. The Coffee project covers a vast land position, but a lot of the gold mineralization is on the northern portion, very close to where Arcus’s Dan Man project is. Last year, Goldcorp bought 19.9% of Arcus. So even though it’s not on the radar of investors, it’s on Goldcorp’s radar. Arcus is drilling the project this year. I’d be surprised if Goldcorp didn’t buy it out at some point.

Kwantes8-14-17-1

TGR: Did any other companies in the Yukon catch your attention?

JK: One company that I like in the Yukon is Strategic Metals Ltd. (SMD:TSX.V). It is a project generator with the largest claims position in the Yukon. It has projects all over the Yukon, so it’s really well poised to capitalize on this money that’s flowing into Yukon exploration companies. 

Strategic is almost like a mutual fund focused on the Yukon. It owns 40% of Rockhaven Resources Ltd. (RK:TSX.V), which has a high-grade gold, polymetallic Yukon deposit of more than 1 Moz of gold in the Inferred category. Strategic owns 7% of the shares of ATAC Resources Ltd. (ATC:TSX.V). ATAC is one of the exploration companies that had a major come in: Barrick Gold Corp. (ABX:TSX; ABX:NYSE), the world’s largest gold mining company, did a joint venture deal on one portion of ATAC’s large land holdings. Both Rockhaven and ATAC have very large drill programs. Strategic also recently spun out to shareholders a new Yukon-focused exploreco called Trifecta Gold (TG:TSX.V) that is drilling at two projects.

Before Goldcorp bought Kaminak, it wasn’t easy to raise exploration money for the Yukon. Now there’s money flowing and quite large drill programs underway. It will be interesting once the results start flowing in to see if the Yukon can sustain the interest and capital flow.

TGR: Are there other companies that you’d like to talk about?

JK: Since we’re talking about gold and high-grade gold, another company that I follow in Resource Opportunities is Sabina Gold & Silver Corp. (SBB:TSX; RXC:FSE; SGSVF:OTCPK). It used to be called Sabina Silver, with a silver polymetallic project that it sold for quite a large amount of money back in 2010-2011. Sabina has been well financed through this terrible bear market that we’ve come through. I picked up coverage of Sabina during the bear market at $0.39. A new CEO had just come in, Bruce McLeod, whom I was familiar with and respected. 

Sabina has the very high-grade Back River gold project up in Nunavut, again a northern project. What’s interesting about Sabina is a lot of the gold is in open pits. Sabina has in all categories more than 7 Moz of gold, and the grades are 5–6 grams/ton (5–6 g/t) gold with some zones that are much higher grade that the company is drilling. Back River is one of the last large, high-grade gold deposits globally that’s owned by a junior mining company. 

But Sabina has had some trouble with permitting. The company went through a lengthy permitting process, with thousands of pages of material and mitigation plans for tailings and caribou management and everything else. The Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) last year recommended to the federal government that the project not go forward. That was obviously a big blow to the company. The federal government went back to the regulator and said we want you to have another, closer look at this project. Sabina went back to the drawing board and altered its plan to address some of the concerns. NIRB reversed itself earlier this summer. 

Sabina stock is now at about $2.27 or so and the company has more than $36 million in the treasury. It is drilling some of the “treasure boxes,” high-grade gold areas that could be a real sweetener for any mining company that takes over the project. 

The Nunavut area is quite active. There’s a company called TMAC Resources Inc. (TMR:TSE) that’s building a high-grade gold mine nearby. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. (AEM:TSX; AEM:NYSE) has some of its best operations up in Nunavut as well.

TGR: What is another company you would like to talk about?

JK: If we’re talking high-grade gold, we can’t leave out Pretium Resources Inc. (PVG:TSX; PVG:NYSE)and its Brucejack project up in the Golden Triangle in British Columbia. Before I took over the Resource Opportunities newsletter, I was an editor and reporter at the Vancouver Sun newspaper. Working as the newspaper’s mining writer was good preparation for the newsletter. Vancouver has so many mining and exploration companies, so I really had to be selective and focus only on the best projects and people. One of the people I interviewed was Bob Quartermain, Pretium’s CEO, when the company had its IPO. He was raving about the high-grade gold up on the Brucejack property.

Pretium Resources Inc.’s Brucejack is high grade, but also has size.

Fast forward a few years, and Pretium recently announced commercial production at Brucejack. The mine is high grade, but also has size. There have been gold mines in the Golden Triangle, which used to be quite an active mining area, with higher grades, but none of them was nearly as large as Brucejack. 

It will be interesting to see how that one plays out. Of course, there was some controversy over the resource and whether the grades hold up. Now Pretium is feeding ore into the mill. So that’ll be a good one to watch for the coming years.

Also up in the Golden Triangle is a little exploration company called GT Gold Corp. (GTT:TSX.V). In its first pass at drilling, GT Gold is hitting some really nice near-surface intercepts, including 13.03 g/t over 10.67 meters. The stock has gone on quite a run. That company has a market cap of about $100 million. Companies that have properties bordering on GTT’s ground are starting to see their stock prices come up. 

I do like to compare companies because in this market things can get out of whack. All the excitement goes to certain names and other ones get neglected. That can create opportunities. For example, there’s a company called IDM Mining Ltd. (IDM:TSX.V) that is building a small underground gold mine in the Golden Triangle that is very high grade. It’s taken over a project that majors had put several million dollars’ worth of work into, including about 2 km of underground workings, tunnels and so on. It just published a feasibility study. IDM, an advanced-stage company that’s now going through permitting, has a market cap of about $50M. 

There’s interest and money flowing into the Golden Triangle, which is very remote and has a winter climate. But more roads have been built in the last few years and also the British Columbia government has built a high-transmission power line that goes right through the heart of the area. There’s another mine called Red Chris, a copper-gold mine that Imperial Metals Corp. (III:TSX) has opened. So there’s a lot going on up there as well. 

TGR: Any other gold companies you want to touch on?

JK: Columbus Gold Corp. (CGT:TSX; CBGDF:OTCQX) is an interesting story. It has some recent news, too. Columbus owns a 45% stake in the Montagne d’Or project in French Guiana. Nordgold SE, a big Russia-based gold mining company, funded a feasibility study at Montagne d’Or, so it now owns 55%. Columbus will probably either sell its 45% stake to Nordgold, or it’ll sell it to another gold mining company. Montagne d’Or is a very large deposit, 5 Moz, with good grades, considerably higher than average gold grades being mined now globally. 

Columbus Gold Corp. has a very powerful exploration partner in Nevada.

Columbus also has a Nevada angle. It recently announced plans to spin out the Nevada properties into a new company called Allegiant Gold. Columbus is shifting focus to its very large land package in Nevada. The exploration team it works with is Cordex, a legendary Nevada exploration team that’s now run by Andy Wallace. Cordex was founded by John Livermore, who was the key person who discovered the Carlin Trend in Nevada, one of the world’s largest stores of gold. Columbus has a very powerful exploration partner there. Columbus is narrowing in on the zones it’s going to drill. It’s another one to watch, especially if the spinout of the Nevada properties goes through as planned. 

TGR: In Resource Opportunities, you also cover uranium. What’s your take on the market?

JK: I love finding things that are hated or neglected, that people don’t care about because they have been low for so long that they’re not even on the radar. And uranium fits that bill. Ever since the Fukushima disaster in 2011, it’s just been lower lows, more or less continually. 

But uranium is a funny market because it’s very cyclical. In the late 2000s, there was an incredible uranium boom that took the spot price up to about $100/lb. And as the uranium price goes down, of course, it becomes less and less economic to mine. Some of the world’s largest producers are cutting production and at a certain point, that will affect the price, which will come up. 

I think uranium is a really good opportunity right now, especially for companies that can go into production in the 2020 decade. And because it’s such a small market, there are not many companies that produce uranium, so when the move happens, it can happen quickly, and it can be fairly violent as well.

TGR: What uranium companies fit that bill?

NexGen Energy Ltd. is really positioned to take a dominant place in the world’s uranium sector.

JK: NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE:TSX; NXE:NYSE.MKT) has a spectacular—I’ll call it a discovery—but it’s actually a very large, growing high-grade deposit in the Athabasca Basin in northwestern Saskatchewan. In 2014, Resource Opportunitiespicked up coverage on NexGen Energy during that terrible bear market. It was a little junior with a land position in the Athabasca Basin, and the stock was at $0.30. For a long time nobody else covered it.

But it started hitting these spectacular, high-grade intercepts, and it’s been quite a success story. The stock is now at $2.73. NexGen just came out with a preliminary economic assessment (PEA) on the Arrow deposit showing very strong economics, including an after-tax internal rate of return of 57% (at an 8% discount rate). 

NexGen Arrow map

For some perspective, Cameco Corp. (CCO:TSX; CCJ:NYSE), the Canadian uranium company, is one of the world’s largest producers, producing something like 15% of annual global supply. The PEA that NexGen just came out with shows that in the first five years of Arrow’s mine life, NexGen would produce more uranium annually than Cameco does now. 

NexGen is really positioned to take a dominant place in the world’s uranium sector. The world’s largest mining companies are all keeping a close eye on it. The stock price has performed in a terrible market for uranium, and I think there’s upside from these levels. If NexGen gets taken over, the company that owns and develops Arrow will have a dominant position in the global uranium market. So it is quite a large prize.

TGR: Recently, NexGen announced that it had a $110 million financing with CEF Holdings Ltd. Does that give it the financial security that it needs to get to production if it decides to take the mine into production itself? 

JK: One of the things that makes junior mining companies vulnerable to hostile takeovers of course is being in a weak financial position. CEF Holdings is a joint venture between CIBC, one of the big Canadian banks, and Li Ka-shing, Asia’s richest person. He’s a multibillionaire and very successful across different sectors, including mining and energy. It’s a real validation. He first took a position last year, and has now doubled down. NexGen’s cash position is about $200 million, and the company’s market capitalization is less than $1 billion. So that treasury really does give NexGen options. 

And the Li Ka-shing connection is important because a lot of the demand growth on the uranium side will come from China. Uranium supply is very important for China, which is building lots of nuclear reactors due to its growing population and energy needs. China is also going big into solar power but the nuclear push is substantial. 

TGR: Let’s switch to diamonds, which your newsletter also covers. Any companies you want to talk about there?

JK: As in uranium, I like to find things that people aren’t interested in or that are out of favor, and diamonds fits the bill. 

I was at the annual Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada meeting in Toronto back in March, and it was a big crowd, lots of good energy. I went to a diamond presentation that had some pretty high-quality companies presenting and the room was almost empty. I found that interesting, especially because among the few people there were Chuck Fipke, a billionaire who found Canada’s first diamond mine, and Eira Thomas, who helped discover Diavik, Canada’s second diamond mine. She was also the CEO of Kaminak when it was taken over by Goldcorp. Eira is a cofounder and director of Lucara Diamond Corp. (LUC:TSX.V) and continues to have an interest in diamonds.

Some of the biggest mining companies in the world are quite interested in diamonds because a profitable diamond mine is a very powerful cash machine. For example, the new boss of Rio Tinto Plc (RIO:NYSE; RIO:ASX; RIO:LSE; RTPPF:OTCPK), Jean-Sebastien Jacques, has talked about how he loves the diamond business. And Rio Tinto just inked a joint venture deal with Shore Gold (SGF:TSX), which is exploring for diamonds in Saskatchewan. And then of course, De Beers for a long time had almost a monopoly on diamond production and marketing. It is now majority owned by Anglo American (AAL:LON), and De Beers has been a real profit generator for Anglo American. 

Back in April, I did a site visit to Lucara’s Karowe diamond mine in Botswana. Lucara is a Vancouver-based Lundin Group company that is quite an interesting story. It bought a De Beers exploration project that De Beers gave up on, and started finding these very large diamonds. A couple of years ago, Lucara found a 1,109-carat diamond, the second largest ever discovered. 

Lucara tried selling the historic diamond at a live auction last year. There were different factors, but it was unable to sell it last year. But Lucara also found an 813-carat diamond that sold for $63 million, a record for a rough stone. 

Lucara’s Karowe mine is small. It only produces about 0.03% of diamonds globally each year, but it produces more than 60% of diamonds that are larger than 10.8 carats (called “specials”). Lucara keeps finding very large diamonds that command really high prices. The company has now paid out more in dividends than it has raised in the capital markets, and the stock yields more than 3.5% at these share price levels. Lucara has been weighed down by this 1,109-carat diamond that remains in inventory, which it named the Lesedi La Rona. I think the Lesedi will sell and for a lot of money. So Lucara is a company that generates a lot of cash flow from Karowe and has consistently increased the dividend.

On the exploration front, a company I follow is called North Arrow Minerals Inc. (NAR:TSX.V). The chairman of North Arrow is Gren Thomas, who is Eira Thomas’s father. He was the CEO of Aber Resources, which discovered the Diavik diamond mine up in Canada’s Northwest Territories. 

North Arrow has the Naujaat diamond project in eastern Nunavut, which has a population of rare, valuable orangey-yellow diamonds. North Arrow recently raised $5 million from investors, including Ross Beaty who invested $2 million. Similar to the large diamonds, colored diamonds are much rarer. And North Arrow has actually cut and polished some of the orangey-yellow diamonds, and they’re quite beautiful stones. With the money raised, North Arrow has taken a small bulk sample and is doing some drilling. The orangey-yellow diamond population could put that project over the economic hurdle to allow it to become an operating diamond mine. 

Orangey-yellow diamond

North Arrow has other projects across Canada as well and a very strong team, with quite an active program over the next nine months. It has discovery potential at some of its other projects, including Mel and Loki.

TGR: Thanks so much for your insights, James. 

James Kwantes is the editor of Resource Opportunities, a subscriber supported junior mining investment publication. Kwantes has two decades of journalism experience and was the mining reporter at Vancouver Sun, the city’s paper of record.

Related Articles


 

Disclosure:
1) Patrice Fusillo conducted this interview for Streetwise Reports LLC and provides services to Streetwise Reports as an employee. She owns, or members of her immediate household or family own, shares of the following companies mentioned in this article: None. She is, or members of her immediate household or family are, paid by the following companies mentioned in this article: None.
2) The following companies mentioned in this interview are billboard sponsors of Streetwise Reports: Columbus Gold, Pretium Resources and NexGen Energy. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services. Click here for important disclosures about sponsor fees. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. 
3) James Kwantes: I, or members of my immediate household or family, own shares of the following companies mentioned in this article: Klondike Gold, Arcus Development Group, Strategic Metals, ATAC Resources, Rockhaven Resources, Trifecta Gold, Sabina Gold & Silver, IDM Mining, Columbus Gold, NexGen Energy, Lucara Diamond Corp, North Arrow Minerals. I, or members of my immediate household or family, are paid by the following companies mentioned in this article: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: Strategic Metals, IDM Mining and North Arrow Minerals. I determined which companies would be included in this article based on my research and understanding of the sector. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview. 
4) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the interview or the decision to write an article, until one week after the publication of the interview or article. As of the date of this interview, officers and/or employees of Streetwise Reports LLC (including members of their household) own securities of Agnico Eagle and Cameco, companies mentioned in this article.

Images provided by James Kwantes

 

 

European Banks – The Next Crisis – The Unseen Cause in Plain View

Frankfurt-Cloudy

The clouds have not lifted from the heart of the financial center within the European Union on the continent. The origin of the next crisis is unseen yet in plain view if you care to look. Ten years since the financial crisis of 2007-2009, the core fundamental problems in the banking sector have not yet been resolved and still fester beneath the surface. Indeed, following the collapse of the investment bank Lehman Brothers, a financial tidal wave swept the world. The collapse of the mortgage backed securities market in the States, set off a contagion where the crisis spread at a rapid pace around the world. European banks tried to compete with New York adopting similar carefree lending. In the end, the Draconian measures from Brussels and constantly adding regulation to all levels of business mixed with tax increases, prevented the economy itself from truly recovering only further preventing a bank recovery.


Paulson Henry-HankThe Federal Reserve had pumped in $250 billion into its big banks and Hank Paulson, I believe, allowed Lehman and Bear Sterns to collapse to reduce competition for Goldman Sachs eliminating two of the five investment banks. The entire affair was set in motion by the Clinton repeal of Glass-Stegall at the recommendation of the father of negative interest rates, Larry Summers.

In Germany, the second-largest bank, WestLB, and Hypo Real Estate (HRE), which had been the largest real estate finance provider, vanished from the financial landscape as did Lehman and Bear Sterns. “HRE and WestLB were the most difficult cases,” remembers Christopher Pleister, the head of the A bailout fund was created in Germany that ran between 2009 to 2014. The fund involved nearly a dozen banks putting in more than €200 billion of equity, guarantees and protective shields.

They are today still “too big to fail” and “too big to jail” so nothing has changed on that score. For until the money coffers are full again for a bailout fund, the risks remain simmering for the next crisis to be far worse next time. The interdependence between states and their banks has not changed. Government still needs the banks to exist themselves. Consequently, national interests prevent the crisis mechanisms from truly policing the practices and the banks are actually disappearing from the market as regulation destroys liquidity in the financial sector. The back offices have growth to exceed the front office doing the business, raising costs dramatically thanks to regulation. When the next financial crisis comes, there is a serious question as to can the system ever hold again?

While every financial crisis typically emerged from an origin that is overlooked or not anticipated, the fundamental causes are usually the same. There is no appreciable risk management that comprehend cycles and each crisis is typically set in motion by the solutions applied to solve the previous crisis. This is the true over-arching issue that is never considered because those applying the solution lack any comprehension of the dynamics of the economy as a whole.

The solution of negative interest rates has set in motion a coming crisis in pensions. As banks now anticipate that the ECB will finally reverse its policy and raise rates, they are dumping government bonds by the truck-load. Higher rates simply means a bond crash. Even the portfolio of the ECB will lose countless billions.

Fortuna

 

So while banks are “too big to fail” and “too big to jail”, government is not “too big to fail” since they depend upon people buying the debt which never ends, yet they may be“too big to jail” since they will never prosecute themselves, but they are not exempt from revolution be it non-violent or violent as history proves. That depends upon the combination of events, how hard government attempts to suppress the uprising to sustain its power, and of course the fickle finger of fate or fortune. The Roman pictures their goddess of Fortune, Fortuna, with one arm hold the cornucopia the symbol of plenty, and the other hand on the rudder of a ship symbolizing she can change your future on a whim.

….also from Martin: Market Talk- August 22, 2017