Bonds & Interest Rates

A Critical Chart Is All Screwed Up Right Now

Veteran bond fund manager Jeff Gundlach recently pointed us to the chart that he looks at when he gets up every morning.

It’s an overlay of the US dollar / emerging-market currency exchange rate and the yield on the 10-year Treasury note.

Gundlach noted that there has been a remarkably tight correlation between the two measures with the currency cross acting as a slight leading indicator of the 10-year yield, which is the benchmark for almost every important interest rate in the world.

Last month when he last spoke of this chart, the currency cross was signaling a decline in the 10-year yield. And as Gundlach correctly predicted, that yield has been tumbling toward the 2.5% level he targeted.

However, the correlation in this chart appears to have broken down.

Earlier today, Morgan Stanley’s Rashique Rahman circulated an up-to-date version of this chart showing the currency cross trending higher as the 10-year yield sinks.

In order for the correlation to be restored, the long-term Treasury yields will have to rise or the currency cross will have to tumble.

chartt-1

EE ALSO:  Jeff Gundlach Disagrees With All Of Wall Street’s 2014 Forecasts In His Brand New Presentation

 

How Can Money Printing Exist and be Absent at the Same Time?

In the past years, the Federal Reserve dropped many inflationary bombs on the markets. Inflationary in the purely monetary sense by supplying money in almost ridiculous amounts, especially base money figures. During this process some commentators believed that the dollar would soon evaporate, that investors will run away in favor of the euro (like the EBC had not been printing euros for their banks), or maybe in favor of the yen (like the Japanese central bank was not that inflationary), or who knows maybe even the yuan. The dollar was supposed to be either dropped by international investors, or killed from within by internal inflationary rates (or possible by those two factors combined together). None of this happened. How are we to explain this if the Fed went almost crazy in monetary creation?

Has Fed printed all this money or not?

machaj february72014 1

As the above chart suggests, a lot of “something” was created in the past years and this trend accelerated in 2008.

This nice looking green hockey stick is about base money. Base money is the money, which builds the monetary economy, but it does not complete it to its full extent. Many transactions in the economy are not conditioned by movements of this monetary aggregate. Base money consists of actual paper notes and coins, and money stored at the central bank (which actually could be changed into paper notes, since the central bank itself produces those two things). It sometimes can be called as “outside money”, meaning that it is money outside of the banking system – it is “exogenously” supplied from outside of the financial markets, and not generated by banking decisions. It is produced by political, or quasi-political means, through the tools of the central banks. This perfectly explains why so much of it could be created within the time span of five years. On a side note, the gold supply cannot be expanded at this pace (a bad feature of gold for past rulers and sufficient rationale for them to demonetize it).

We’ve already seen this green hockey stick so many times in so many places; but despite some Armageddon predictions the end of the dollar seems far away. Why is the dollar thriving if in five years there is four times more of it? Why are inflation rates not four times higher than they were at times before the crises? If the money supply is being printed at such a pace, surely it should boost the prices, shouldn’t it?

That is the usual monetarist story. Unfortunately, or maybe gladly, we should say it is not true; or more precisely not true in this case. The important fact about money printing, which has to be remembered in any analysis, is that it all depends upon how the “printing” is done, and where the money goes. As the old saying goes, follow the money, and it should lead to you answers you are searching for.

Paper notes and coins are being spent in the market for sure. Money placed at the central bank belongs to commercial banks and is not directly spent as paper notes are (sorry – individuals are not allowed to have accounts at the central bank, even on the Internet; it is a special right exclusively reserved for commercial banks). Nevertheless any bank is happy to have such money in its account at the national central bank. The graph above depicts precisely this type of adjustment that happened due to the Fed’s actions. Electronic money was “magically” produced and transmitted into the commercial banks. As you may reasonably expect, they were more than happy to accept this precious gift from the Fed. Especially in the light of the fact that “collateral” for this fresh money could be made out of junk paper related to a dying real estate market.

The point is that if one wants to be detailed, it is at least misleading to describe monetary creation as money printing. It sounds really nice, dramatic and appealing, one has to admit. Yet the truth is that this money is created not with ink and paper, but by pressing the button and producing computer zeroes in electronic books and accounts. Here is where the trick begins and here is why this tremendous electronic printing did not cause either an inflationary spike, or a run away from the dollar.

The banks are glad to accept any pile of money. Either from the government (fiscal policy), or from the central bank (by monetary policy), or also by more voluntary means, by accepting deposits, or additional equity from the investors. Yet whenever they receive this money, the profit for them is not really to just spend the money. The profit for them comes from possibility of lending this money at interest, and this is not something they absolutely have to do.

Consequently, base money creation does not necessarily have to translate into a quick plunge in the value of the US dollar, or to have massive inflationary implications. In this way, money can be created, but without immediate consequences that one would expect. In other words, in this way, the money “printing” can exist and be absent at the same time.

 

Thank you.

Matt Machaj, PhD

Sunshine Profits‘ Market Overview Editor

Gold Market Overview at SunshineProfits.com

 

* * * * *

 

Disclaimer

 

All essays, research and information found above represent analyses and opinions of Matt Machaj, PhD and Sunshine Profits’ associates only. As such, it may prove wrong and be a subject to change without notice. Opinions and analyses were based on data available to authors of respective essays at the time of writing. Although the information provided above is based on careful research and sources that are believed to be accurate, Matt Machaj, PhD and his associates do not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the data or information reported. The opinions published above are neither an offer nor a recommendation to purchase or sell any securities. Matt Machaj, PhD is not a Registered Securities Advisor. By reading Matt Machaj’s, PhD reports you fully agree that he will not be held responsible or liable for any decisions you make regarding any information provided in these reports. Investing, trading and speculation in any financial markets may involve high risk of loss. Matt Machaj, PhD, Sunshine Profits’ employees and affiliates as well as members of their families may have a short or long position in any securities, including those mentioned in any of the reports or essays, and may make additional purchases an

Billionaire Sprott – Expect A Terrifying Shock To The System

shapeimage 22With global stock markets getting a bounce after a turbulent start to 2014, today billionaire Eric Sprott warned King World News that investors around the world need to brace themselves for a terrifying shock to the global financial system.  The Canadian billionaire also lashed out at the central banks for their failed policies.  Below is what Sprott, Chairman of Sprott Asset Management, had to say in Part I of this remarkable interview series.

Eric King:  “Eric, what is the big threat going forward?  What has you worried here?

…see Eric Sprott’s answer HERE

 

Mortgage rates creep down toward 4%

 

 Rates have crept down every week this year.  

Maybe the days of rock-bottom mortgage interest rates aren’t numbered, after all. Once again, rates are creeping down towards 4%.

 

Rates dropped 0.09 percentage point this week to 4.23% for a 30-year, fixed -rate home loan, according to the latest weekly report from Freddie Mac. – full article

 

TORONTO (Reuters) – Canadian National Railway Co reached a deal on Wednesday to avert a strike by conductors and yard workers after the Conservative government said it would use back-to-work legislation to keep the country’s biggest railway operating.

The Teamsters Canada Rail Conference gave notice earlier in the day that it intended to strike as soon as Saturday after members voted against a tentative agreement with Canada’s biggest rail operator.

A new three-year agreement is a modification of the tentative pact reached in October, union general chairman Roland Hackl said.

“I’m glad there’s not going to be a strike,” he said, shortly after the deal was reached. He said no details would be released until the deal is ratified.

A work stoppage by about 3,000 conductors, train and yard workers would have disrupted a vast cross-country network that ships goods ranging from lumber and crude oil to grains and automobiles.

Kellie Leitch, the country’s labor minister, had said at a press conference in Ottawa that the government was preparing back-to-work legislation to “protect Canada’s economy and Canadian grain farmers.”

The Conservatives, led by Prime Minister Stephen Harper, have been quick to intervene in recent years to avoid major labor disruptions. In 2012, it legislated striking workers back to work at both CN rival Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) and Air Canada.

The swift government response came after the union told Reuters that CN said in a morning meeting it was “done negotiating” and workers must choose between an existing labor deal and walking off the job.  

….read page 2 HERE