Currency

Dollar May Drag Down Emerging Markets

sc


Countless Moving Parts

One factor that makes investing such a difficult task is the almost infinite number of inputs impacting the value of any asset. For example, emerging market stocks could be negatively impacted by economic divergences between the United States and Europe. How can that be?

  1. Strength in the U.S economy may cause the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates in 2015.
  2. Higher rates in the U.S. make the U.S. dollar more attractive relative to the euro.
  3. Emerging market stocks tend to be negatively correlated to the U.S. dollar, meaning when the dollar strengthens, emerging markets tend to experience a currency headwind.

35081 b

Fed May Raise Rates In 2015

Although economic data has been mixed recently, the trend has been improving over the last year. From Reuters:

Better U.S. economic data has boosted the view the Fed may be closer to raising rates, and the dollar’s gains have come at the same time as rising Treasury yields. Still continuing slack in the labor market is also viewed as keeping the Fed on hold for several more quarters. “People are more confident that the Fed is reaching its objectives,” Chandler said. He added, however, that “while the economy is healing, it’s not healthy.”

ECB vs. Fed

While the Fed is expected to rein in monetary policy in the coming months, the European Central Bank (ECB) has indicated a bias towards increasing their stimulative efforts. The diverging paths between the central banks are having an impact on the currency markets. From Reuters:

The dollar hit a 14-month peak against the euro on Tuesday, on optimism the U.S. economy is growing in line with expectations that the Federal Reserve may begin raising interest rates next year.

Investment Implications – The Weight Of The Evidence

On Tuesday, the S&P 500 closed inside the support band shown in the chart below (1984 to 1991). Therefore, it is too early to get overly concerned about recent weakness in equities. The blue trendline in the chart below has acted as support on numerous occasions (see green arrows). The S&P 500 bounced near the blue trendline Tuesday (see orange arrow), meaning buyers stepped in at a logical level.

35081 c

As noted via the tweet below, the chart above can be used in conjunction with other levels of possible support for the S&P 500.

35081 d

Our concerns would increase with each level taken out. If support holds, we will err on the side of doing nothing in the short run. If support breaks, we will review the evidence and make any necessary adjustments to our allocations. For now, we continue to hold U.S. stocks (SPY), leading sectors (XLV), and a stake in U.S. Treasuries (TLT). We will enter Wednesday’s session with a flexible and open mind.

 

About Chris Ciovacco

Chris Ciovacco is the Chief Investment Officer for Ciovacco Capital Management, LLC. More on the web at www.ciovaccocapital.com.

 

All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Investment recommendations may change and readers are urged to check with their investment counselors and tax advisors before making any investment decisions. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. This memorandum is based on information available to the public. No representation is made that it is accurate or complete. This memorandum is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities mentioned. The investments discussed or recommended in this report may be unsuitable for investors depending on their specific investment objectives and financial position. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. The price or value of the investments to which this report relates, either directly or indirectly, may fall or rise against the interest of investors. All prices and yields contained in this report are subject to change without notice. This information is based on hypothetical assumptions and is intended for illustrative purposes only. THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, OR RESULTS OBTAINED FROM ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS ARTICLE.

Ciovacco Capital Management, LLC is an independent money management firm based in Atlanta, Georgia. CCM helps individual investors and businesses, large & small; achieve improved investment results via research and globally diversified investment portfolios. Since we are a fee-based firm, our only objective is to help you protect and grow your assets. Our long-term, theme-oriented, buy-and-hold approach allows for portfolio rebalancing from time to time to adjust to new opportunities or changing market conditions.

Copyright © 2006-2014 Chris Ciovacco

Key Day For The US Dollar….

‘I’ve been waiting for this day for more than a year now when I first created this long term US dollar chart” – Rambus

Full article at this site where all 6 charts are in full size without having to click on each one. – Money Talks Editor

35025 a

 

Martin Armstrong – Kiss Paper Money Goodbye & Stocks to Soar

Martin says beware of early September, it may be a buying opportunity and a temporary new high. The world is a complete mess and that means the flow of funds are headed to Wall Street. Where else can large institutions park their Trillions? It’s the only game in town (In this interview on 27th Aug 14 Martin states he does not think the stock market is in a frothy bubble and he sees the S&P running up to test 3000 – Ed Money Talks).

Get ready for electronic currencies. Your paper cash will literally become trash shortly and the world’s governments want it that way. Think of the billions more in taxes they’ll be able to extract. Perhaps Bitcoin will be banned as well, it all remains to be seen. Just get ready for what’s next. 

Martin’s also discusses his proprietary system Socrates, to which he’s devoted a large portion of his resources and his life. The system takes the emotion and opinion out of forecasting, tracing the flow of funds and confidence, thereby providing and unbiased forecast on what’s next.  

…also:

 

Gold at $2000?

 

QUESTION: Marty, do you think it is even possible for gold to close at $2,000 by year-end? This just seems to be the same story over and over again.

Thanks

SK

NYGOLD-Y-1264-2013-Support

(1864 high with 1992 low)

ANSWER: Sorry, no. Here is a chart of gold back to 1264. There is not even a pattern like that, which has EVER taken place. I am really at a loss why gold analysts keep proclaiming the same thing costing people their life savings. This is not how professionals trade. We have a huge professional client base because they have learned the hard way that OPINION is nonsense and not reliable. Is this not just a process of churning out novices and causing them countless losses to line the pockets of the pros? This is seriously impacting the lives of people and that needs to be respected.

Technically, this is the primary support channel in gold. It has not changed. These forecasts for gold are entirely out of context and ignore the entire world economic trends. You cannot even argue gold rises with war for that is not even true. Gold did not rally during World War II because it was fixed. Commodities did not rise because the government put in wage and price controls. This is not a simple if then do this formula. It takes a bit more – if then do this else do that.

GC-1982-Dollars

The major resistance in gold stands at $2300. That is the old 1980 high in today’s terms adjusted for inflation. Gold has NOT been the hedge against inflation as touted. If you bought gold in 1980 at $875 and the Dow Jones Industrials at 1,000, you have about $1300 for gold and 17,000 for stocks. That cannot be excused away. Gold is NOT a hedge against inflation, it is NOT money for you cannot pay your mortgage with it unless you sell it for dollars for the definition of “money” is the acceptance by society as a medium of exchange. It is not even legal tender for you cannot pay your taxes with it without converting to dollars. It is an investment – plain and simple.

romedecaureus-3

Gold remains the historical hedge against government. You should never reject all other investments waiting for gold to finally rally. I retired from the gold business after 1980BECAUSE the model projected a 19 year bear market. Sorry if that is impatient. But waiting 19 years is a bit too much for me personally. NOTHING always rises. There is a cycle to everything. You need to create databases to see what is even possible – not make up shit.

gold-fluctuated1

When gold has been money it DECLINES with inflation and rises with DEFLATION. It has never been a store of value for that would imply a communistic state where everything is fixed from assets and wages to ensure that money buys the same every day. These are simply stories for children for they cannot be real. The idea that money is a store of value is a pipe-dream for those who do not understand how to even invest so they want to prohibit everyone else from making money since they do not.

gold-1982-1991

Gold will rally when it rises in ALL CURRENCIES – not just dollars. To even claim gold will rise to $2,000 implies the dollar will crash. What about BIG MONEY that really drives the global economy? Where does it go? Rubles, Yuan, Euros? Come on. The worst is yet to come but that is a Sovereign Debt Crisis and I hate to tell these people it is at an advanced stage in Europe and Japan. We have not even gotten a taste of it yet in the USA – only a whiff with events like Detroit. Sorry, the dollar’s rise will still center stage and the will set in motion the economic decline from the outside moving in.

Gold’s role will be completely different. We are addressing this in the upcoming special report. This is covering gold in all major currencies so you can see the change in trend and when it is really due. This report is over 300 pages.

Euro: High Wire Acts & Hand Grenades

Quotable

“Well first of all, tell me: Is there some society you know that doesn’t run on greed? You think Russia doesn’t run on greed? You think China doesn’t run on greed? What is greed? Of course, none of us are greedy, it’s only the other fellow who’s greedy. The world runs on individuals pursuing their separate interests. The great achievements of civilization have not come from government bureaus. Einstein didn’t construct his theory under order from a bureaucrat. Henry Ford didn’t revolutionize the automobile industry that way. In the only cases in which the masses have escaped from the kind of grinding poverty you’re talking about, the only cases in recorded history, are where they have had capitalism and largely free trade. If you want to know where the masses are worse off, worst off, it’s exactly in the kinds of societies that depart from that. So that the record of history is absolutely crystal clear, that there is no alternative way so far discovered of improving the lot of the ordinary people that can hold a candle to the productive activities that are unleashed by the free-enterprise system.”

― Milton Friedman

Commentary & Analysis

Euro: High wire acts and hand grenades

You’ve got to hand it to European Central Bank President Mario Draghi.  He is a talented showman (and personally seems like the kind of guy you wouldn’t mind sipping a dram or two with).  If he worked in a  circus he would be the hi-wire act—a real daredevil who juggles a bowling ball, chain saw, and wheel of cheese as he inches along the wire; with no net of course.  And to make it even more interesting, imagine in the middle of Mr. Draghi’s death defying feat, some French guy stands up and throws a hand grenade into the center ring.  I think that is what just happened this week. 

1409150564895

Two days ago…from The Guardian:

“France has entered uncharted political waters after the Prime Minister, Manuel Valls, presented his government’s resignation amid a political crisis triggered by his maverick economy minister who called for an end to austerity policies imposed by Germany.

[Arnaud] Montebourg, 51, [French economic minister] fired his first broadside in an interview with Le Monde on Saturday and followed up with a speech to a Socialist party rally the following day. In a veiled reference to President François Hollande, he said that conformism was an enemy and ‘my enemy is governing’.  ‘France is a free country which shouldn’t be aligning itself with the obsessions of the German right,’ he said, urging a “just and sane resistance”.

As we say in the south: “Them is fightin words.” 

In short, French economic troubles have been caused by the German’s adherence to fiscal discipline required under the single currency regime, according to Mr. Montebourg.  I am sure none of France’s problems have anything to do with its nutty Socialism and incredibly inflexible labor policies.  But the damage is done.  The feces are now floating in the proverbial punchbowl for all to see.

It may or may not be Germany’s fault.  Germany taxpayers have made real commitments to the zone while maintaining their individual balance sheet discipline, when others haven’t.  So, whether right or wrong, it is a dangerous game indeed for the euro for high-level French officials to debate this stuff in public.  The single currency could survive Greece leaving.  It can survive the UK leaving the Eurozone.  But it cannot survive if France says “game over.” 

I guess the French policymakers either forgot, or don’t have a similar saying as we do in the US: Be careful what you wish for it may come true.  What I mean is the French were very excited to get Germany to sign on to the single currency regime initially.  They believed it was possible to financially control, or at least tame, Germany in a way that hasn’t proved possible on the battlefield.  Silly idea indeed! 

You think you’re a busy person, just think of German Chancellor Angela Merkel.  She is in the midst of negotiating some type of stalemate between Ukraine and Russia before it turns into an unmitigated disaster for Germany and Europe (something US policy makers seem to be rooting for).  She has to now figure out how to placate France and not be seen abandoning her commitment to fiscal responsibility across the Eurozone.  Otherwise, all actions on that score and her credibility ring a bit hollow going forward.  Yikes.  And in addition, she has to run to the store and buy a disposable cell phone every other day to keep the NSA snoops away.  Busy, busy, busy…  Likely why she doesn’t vacation as much, or play golf and basketball every day of the week, no matter the crisis of the moment, as our President does. 

1409150635265

Back on February 24th 2014, in Currency Currents, I asked the question: “Does Germany want deflation?”  [Based on the email I received from that missive, it wasn’t a piece which endeared me to the average German citizen, shall we say.  But please keep in mind when I pen these silly missives, I am almost exclusively talking about a country’s government policies—not its people.  Heck, when it comes to lousy government, you can’t get much worse than where we are in the US now, given where we came from.  I said to my wife the other day.  It seems the United States used to export liberty, free market ideals, and decent cultural standards, for the most part.  Now it seems we export war, regulation, and cultural rot, in my humble opinion. Try not to blame its people.  Most of us aren’t happy with the path America is taking. ]

I’d like to share the payoff part of the piece I wrote back in February in light of recent French “concerns”…

And this from Leto Research shows how dominant Germany’s net international investment position has become since the euro single currency regime began implementation back in 2002:

“Germany leads the group of Eurozone net lenders with a net international investment position (NIIP) of €1.26 trillion or 51% of its GDP. This is almost as high as China’s net international investment position and much higher than China’s as a percent of GDP.

Germany’s status as Europe’s premier lender was acquired as a result of the introduction of Euro bank notes in 2002. On that year, Germany’s NIIP was €107 billion or 5.1% of its GDP. Seven years later, in 2008, it had grown to €631 billion or 25.5% of GDP. Over the following five years of Eurozone debt crisis management, Germany’s NIIP doubled to €1,262 billion or 51% of GDP.”

Implications are these:

  • Deflation would further improve Germany’s net lender position in Europe.
  • Because net lending is a claim on assets, German industrial companies acquire more productive assets of periphery countries as deflationary pressures intensify.

Already the pressure on the periphery countries is leading to a brain drain of the best and brightest young professionals into Germany; or become recruits of powerful German companies in the region.  Germany in effect is sucking the productive cream off of the Eurozone.  Hats off—it is a brilliant strategy even if by happenstance—which seems unlikely to me. 

—————-

As I said, it may be brilliant strategy on the part of Germany; and what is wrong with that?  Countries don’t really have allies it seems to me.  They have relations they find beneficial.  They have countries they find dangerous.  But all countries vie for position against those they do and don’t like.  So should Germany be faulted for outsmarting and rest of the pack?  Did everyone who joined the euro expect Germany to eventually be the sugar daddy out of altruism? 

The fact is Germany has benefited from deflation and the austerity that caused it, when you consider its strategic positioning.  That is not to say Germany wouldn’t have rather seen the Eurozone prosper; they likely would have because they effectively have a much lower currency to compete with using the euro than they would if they were still using the D-mark, i.e. they want that game to continue.  

The question it seems to me for France to answer is this:  Will France’s long-term competitive positioning as a country be benefited from remaining within the single currency regime (the gold standard in the Eurozone forcing deflation upon its members) or would it be better off to return to the French franc and be able to use its currency as a mechanism for cross-border competitiveness instead of wage and asset deflation?  This question for the first time now seems clearly on the table—in full public view.

And while many are now focused on the French-German question, our hero Mario is still inching along the high wire doing his thing; trying to maintain focus on his technique and professional training.  One slip and there is an even bigger mess in the center of the ring where the hand grenade just exploded. 

Jack Crooks

President, Black Swan Capital

www.blackswantrading.com

info@blackswantrading.com

Twitter: @bswancap

A note on Chinese real estate concerns – Aussie seems the play on the FX side

Quotable

“If you try to change it, you will ruin it. Try to hold it, and you will lose it.”

― Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching

Commentary & Analysis

A note on Chinese real estate concerns – Aussie seems the play on the FX side

As you probably know, real estate prices in China are falling.  You only have to Google the following: “Chinese Ghost Cities,” to get a sense of how pronounced the over building seems in China.

1409052223250

            EMPTY ROADS IN ZHENGZHOU, CHINA

But, despite rising concerns from many analysts, the question is this: Can China really afford a real estate crisis? 

The short answer is no.  Not only because real estate represents such a huge proportion of the country’s GDP, but according to the Financial Times:

More than 90 per cent of urban households already own at least one home, and for those households that own apartments, nearly 76 per cent of their assets are in real estate,according to Gan Li, director of the Survey and Research Centre for China Household Finance in China.”

The total number of urban households is not defined in the article.  But I think we can assume two things: 1) there are a lot of them, and 2) those households who have the money to invest in real estate are also the core consumer class in China.  And according to reports, real estate has been a prime source of savings for young and old in China; thus it cuts across all generations.  Thus, the potential for social unrest is there.  But beyond that, I think we can conclude a real estate crisis will hit Chinese consumption hard, just as it did to US consumption.  This is not a healthy prospect for the country given consumption to GDP is already at historically world-beating lows. 

The Party seems serious about reform, which may be one reason why all those corrupt officials keep “jumping” out of windows.  My bet is China runs out of corrupt officials before it runs out of windows (maybe this is an idea Washington D.C. can get behind).  A key to reform is a transition away from massive investment stimulus, aka malinvestment into said Ghost Cities, to a more balanced consumer-based economy.  The old economic model which served them well is dead.  The leadership knows that.  But knowing that and implementing change without major blow-back and social turmoil are two different things.    

It seems the demand for liquidity in China is rising.  This liquidity demand coincides with the mandate for banking reform, which by its nature reduces liquidity.  And external sources of liquidity seem likely to fade, as:

1)      The US Fed drains dollar liquidity out of the market

2)      European banking continues to delever  

So, can we expect another massive wave of stimulus from the Chinese government soon?  Betting against this in the past has proved fruitless despite warning about the malinvestment risks.  But even if we see more stimulus efforts to help real estate buyers in China, it is unlikely to have the same impact externally.   

Because I don’t expect more building (anywhere relative to what we have seen) it’s unlikely another wave of raw materials demand will flow from China even if the government helps engineer a soft-landing in real estate. I say that because the banking reform mandate suggests any stimulus will be more closely monitored and targeted, as opposed to the blanket variety stimulus which in past seeped everywhere, was multiplied by Shadow Banking and supported a good portion of the massive overbuild and demand for commodities as its extension.

We can’t discount completely the possibility this time if different and real crisis will erupt in the real estate market (though we should probably place low probability on this event considering how China seems to cope so effectively with problems viewed as “a budding crisis” from the perspective of Western-based analysts applying conventional economic analysis).  So given those as rationales, my favorite way to play this from a currency perspective is through the Australian dollar. 

1409052175589

I’ve written here before (and maybe it is a bit of hyperbole on my part) saying Australia has become a satellite country of China, from an economic perspective.  Maybe that isn’t true, but there still seems plenty of fallout left for the Australian economy whose massive build in mining capacity coincided nicely with the boom in Chinese real estate

AUD/USD Weekly:

1409052146491

Jack Crooks

President, Black Swan Capital

www.blackswantrading.com

info@blackswantrading.com

Twitter: @bswancap