Energy & Commodities

Four Companies for the Metals Market Turnaround

The bear market was tough. Lots of companies went into complete hibernation; lots of people left the sector. It takes time for companies to get going again, but they have begun to get back on their feet, says Gwen Preston, founder of Resource Maven. She discusses some of the major trends she sees in the mining industry, and profiles several companies that survived the lean years and could lead the pack going forward.

ICG10-13-16image

Majors Are on the Hunt
Majors, after selling almost everything to survive the bear market, need to start restocking the pipeline again. Usually that process starts with new production and near-development stories, but there just aren’t very many such assets around. The bear market derailed so many projects that only a small number are ready to be built or are newly operational. Majors are circling these opportunities but, because they know competition will be stiff, they are also going straight to exploration-stage opportunities.

However, don’t expect a wave of M&A. Instead, I think we are going to see a wave of partnerships—joint ventures and equity investments that give the major a foot in the door with assets they like. And while such deals aren’t as exciting for the market as takeouts, they are important because they make it possible for juniors to advance their projects quickly and to focus on exploration instead of where and how to find capital.

Optionality Offers Leverage, but Little More
Optionality plays have done very well in gold’s run to date. Investors have piled into the idea of leveraging gold via a portfolio of projects with significant ounces in the ground. That leverage will remain. And leverage to a rising price is win enough for many. However, if a win for you means a takeout or a construction decision, optionality isn’t the right game.

This time around, majors are not interested in size. They want value. Goldcorp did not buy Kaminak because a mine at Coffee would impact its production profile significantly; it bought it because Coffee will be an economically robust mine that will help Goldcorp’s bottom line.

Value accretive assets are the name of today’s game. That means things like infrastructure, metallurgy, social license, design complexity, and costs really matter. Large deposits with challenges in these areas are not of interest. They may yet come back into vogue, but if they do it will not be for a while. Majors destroyed so much capital buying for size without focusing on practical value in the last cycle that the focus on value accretive assets will stick around for quite a while.

Juniors Are Gaining Confidence
Juniors are gaining confidence that capital is available. It has taken time for that confidence to establish, which is why so many juniors initially planned only small drill programs this year–they were still in full capital conservation mode. Now they see oversubscribed financings left and right, backing everything from advanced assets to grassroots exploration and from the revival of old projects to new discoveries.

The confidence means drill programs are being expanded, new targets are being tested, and new partnerships or acquisitions are being inked. Most moves are still small relative to the exploration programs or deals we see when things are hot, but they are a heck of a lot bigger than they were six months ago, let alone a year ago.

Those Active Now Will Win Later
The bear market was tough. Lots of companies went into complete hibernation; lots of people left the sector. It takes time for companies to get going again from standstill and for people to insert themselves back into the sector. That’s OK; it’s part of the process. But the companies and people who stayed alive through it are leading the pack today.

Companies that stayed alive are reaping the rewards of their bear market efforts. The efforts were often directed at tasks that could be accomplished, like advancing engineering or metallurgy or permitting or social license. Not sexy stuff—but when the market is so turned off that stocks fall on hot drill results, it makes sense to focus on the boring.

Below are a few of the companies that can benefit from these trends.

Integra Gold Corp. (ICG:TSX.V; ICGQF:OTCQX) is working toward the release of a prefeasibility study, but don’t be misled: this is a development-stage gold company.

Screen Shot 2016-10-14 at 6.50.05 AMThe adit that is being driven underground for exploration purposes for now is sized for production. The mill is almost ready to go; having a mill already built cuts the capital to turn this project into a mine probably in half.

Tight drilling is almost completed to upgrade the upper first-mined part of the deposit to reserve status. The brownfield nature of the property also means there is little permitting needed and the hoops that do need to be jumped through are straightforward and unlikely to cause problems. Plus, Lamaque is adjacent to the town of Val d’Or. This is Canadian mining central, a city named after gold and in need of a new major mine to provide employment.

Integra’s team has all the experience needed to start mining at Lamaque; it mixes together engineers and miners who have mined in the Val d’Or area for years with capital markets operators who can raise capital and tell the story.

Integra is one of few Canadian gold projects that could be taken to production this cycle, for a reasonable cost and with lots of exploration upside. Integra could do it alone or get taken out.

Also on the radar is Maritime Resources Corp. (MAE:TSX.V), which is closing in on upgrading from an exploration story to a development company. The prefeasibility study for the Hammertown gold mine in Newfoundland should be out within a few weeks.

Once Doug Fulcher and his team have that document in hand, they will start working to source capital to build the operation.

The build will not be expensive, as they are not building a mill—ore will be processed at the Nugget Pond mill 140 km away. Including milling and trucking costs, the operation should still generate a very nice return, perhaps as high as a 70% IRR.

The East Coast of Canada is attracting a lot of attention these days as a good gold district that is supportive of mine development. Maritime is well positioned in terms of its project, location, and stage.

The next company, TerraX Minerals Inc. (TXR:TSX.V), recently released assay results for the first four holes of its 27,000-metre drill program. The four holes tested Mispickel, which is the northernmost target in the 10km by 4km Target Area that is TerraX’s area of focus at the large Yellowknife City project. The Target Area covers a flexure of the regional Yellowknife shear zone; such flexures create the kinds of openings that can host gold.

Screen Shot 2016-10-14 at 6.50.17 AMMost of the targets TerraX has focused on to date lie along the west side of the Target Area, including Crestaurum, Barney, Brent-Hebert, and Shear 20. The work there has generated good results but, to ensure all significant targets saw initial testing before any one got the lion’s share of exploration attention, of late TerraX shifted to two targets on the east side, called Sam Otto and Mispickel.

The first holes into Mispickel last winter returned some nice hits. Those hits lined up, delineating a vertical shear zone of mineralization. Lower-grade hits also suggested the presence of mineralization in a hangingwall zone and a footwall zone.

So to kick off the summer program TerraX returned to Mispickel and tested below those summer hits. Results included 29.9 g/t gold over 5.5 metres, 22.4 g/t gold over 3 metres, and 12.5 g/t gold over 5.9 metres.

So far Mispickel is showing good consistency of mineralization and structure. Two drills continue to test the zone. One is doing work like the holes just reported: testing known zones down dip and along strike. The other is drilling aggressive stepout holes along the interpreted trend. If both efforts return gold, Mispickel will have quickly shown itself to be a high-grade gold system with scale.

Our final company is in uranium, which is out of favor right now, but NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE:TSX; NXGEF:OTCQX) has been busy laying the groundwork for the metal’s turnaround.

Screen Shot 2016-10-14 at 6.50.33 AMThe company’s Arrow deposit is one of the best mineral discoveries of the decade, regardless of commodity. Arrow is big, it is high grade, it is mineable, and it is in a good jurisdiction. Arrow will become a mine one day.

NexGen’s outperformance over the last year despite uranium’s continuing deep bear market proves these points.

The uranium bear market continues. The spot price is near an 11-year low. This trend will reverse—the world will run into a uranium shortage in 2019 or 2020—but the turnaround clearly hasn’t started yet.

When it does, NexGen will rocket. It’s possible that Cameco will buy it before then. Either way, this stock will do well in the long run, and anyone who believes that a uranium bull market is in the cards should have exposure.

Until then, the stock will probably just hold ground. That’s somewhat crazy, given that NexGen announces incredibly high-grade drill results every month and is now showing that Arrow probably isn’t the only deposit on its property, but that’s what will be given the uranium sector and the fact that the next big thing for NexGen—an updated resource estimate—is not due out for almost half a year.

With almost a decade of junior resource-focused journalism under her belt, Gwen Preston launched Resource Maven. Preston watches the wires, talks to her network and analyzes economics to identify resource news that matters and figure out how to profit. She focuses on early-stage exploration and development stories. Preston has been interviewed on CBC and in the Financial Post.

Related Articles

 

Want to read more Gold Report articles like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see recent articles and interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviewspage.

 

Disclosure:
1) The following companies mentioned in the article are sponsors of Streetwise Reports: Integra Gold Inc., TerraX Minerals Inc. and NexGen Energy Ltd. The companies mentioned in this article were not involved in any aspect of the article preparation. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
2) Gwen Preston: I, or members of my immediate household or family, own shares of the following companies mentioned in this article: Integra, Maritime, TerraX, NexGen. I personally am, or members of my immediate household or family are, paid by the following companies mentioned in this article: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this article: None. I determined which companies would be included in this article based on my research and understanding of the sector.
3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article.
4) Patrice Fusillo assisted with the compilation of this article for Streetwise Reports LLC and provides services to Streetwise Reports as an employee. She owns, or her family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
5) This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.br /> 6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise during the up-to-four-week interval from the time of the interview until after it publishes.

 

The World’s Most Hated Commodity Becomes Attractive

coal3This Brand-New Energy Heavyweight Says Coal Is A Buy

As I’ve been discussing recently, there have been signs of life for the coal market the last few weeks

And this week, the world’s most hated commodity got another big vote of confidence — from one of the newest major players in global energy markets. 

That’s Japan’s Jera Co. A joint venture created last year between Japan’s two largest power companies, Tokyo Electric Power Co. Holdings Inc. and Chubu Electric Power Co. 

And on Tuesday, Jera said it’s buying into coal — in a big way. 

Specifically, Jera announced it will purchase the coal-trading arm of France’s EDF. Buying out the entirety of the coal division, which is one of the world’s largest clearinghouses for the commodity. 

The move is a big step-out for Jera, which has been focusing on natural gas since its formation in April 2015. And the deal comes with not just a coal trading platform, but also gives the firm direct ownership in a number of important assets in the global coal industry. 

That includes a direct stake in the Narrabri coal mine of Australia. As well as ownership of the Rietlanden coal shipping terminal in the Netherlands. 

All told, the deal will instantly make Jera the largest thermal coal trader in Japan — with likely annual supply capacity of 30 million tonnes. 

Although the price for the deal wasn’t disclosed, it’s almost certainly a significant figure — possibly running into the billions. Showing that Jera is very serious about getting into this space. 

That’s a big vote of confidence in coal, given it’s coming from two of the most important insider firms in the Japanese energy space. Obviously these players see coal demand in Japan remaining robust for the foreseeable future — meaning that fundamentals are still strong in one of the world’s most important consuming nations. 

That suggests things may not be as bad as all the current doom and gloom would suggest. Watch for more deals coming on downtrodden assets — and to see who will be doing the strategic buying. 

Here’s to placing your bets,

Dave Forest
piercepoints.com

….related:

The Coming Oil Price Crash

 

The Coming Oil Price Crash

290887abfac3c601b63ec0c45771614dWe have been hearing a great deal about IMF concerns recently, after the release of its October 2016 World Economic Outlook and its Annual Meeting from October 7-9. The concerns mentioned include the following:

– Too much growth in debt, with China particularly mentioned as a problem
– World economic growth seems to have slowed on a long-term basis
– Central bank intervention required to produce artificially low interest rates, to produce even this low growth
– Global international trade is no longer growing rapidly
– Economic stagnation could lead to protectionist calls

These issues are very much related to issues that I have been writing about:

….continue reading HERE

…related:

For How Long Can OPEC Talk Up Oil Prices?

For How Long Can OPEC Talk Up Oil Prices?

Not a day passes without OPEC making oil and gas headlines, and today is surely no exception. Seemingly in lockstep with OPEC, the market is once again pacified on the promise that changes to the global oil supply glut are a’ comin’.

Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal quoted anonymous sources close to the matter who had it on good authority that the Saudi’s were willing to cut “up to” 400,000 barrels per day (and that they had planned to do so all along, with or without an OPEC agreement). We can assume this figure is off August or September levels, which are near-record highs for the oil-rich country.

Of course, there are 400,000 different possible production cut figures included in this “up to 400,000” range — including a big fat zero — so fundamentally speaking, like so much of the OPEC speak, this could mean nothing.

But this isn’t the first time OPEC chatter or supposition or guesswork has moved markets, and it won’t be the last. Because, as Oilprice contributor Rakesh Upadhyay pointed out back in August, just a month before the freeze was announced, fundamentals aren’t what’s driving the oil market — speculation is. And nothing feeds speculators like OPEC.

As Upadhyay wrote, “Though most analysts agreed that a production freeze was not going to alter the fundamentals, prices rose sharply, with the hedge funds adding record long positions,” as evidenced by the chart below, which shows what happened in February when OPEC cuts were on the table for Doha. Fundamentals didn’t change — the glut wasn’t easing — yet hedge funds and speculation on OPEC rumors drove up prices.

42745 large
Larger Image

The hope quickly faded when the Doha meeting fell short of expectations, but prices continued to climb. Then, the market found new hope in the Vienna meeting. We then wondered — this time quite wistfully — if a freeze could… maybe, possibly… happen in that meeting over the summer, much in the same way one might hold onto hope that we might someday win the lotto. Our hopes were dashed yet again — but not before the market reflexively inched up again.

Soon after, Saudi comments, which indicated that a new spirit of cooperation among OPEC members might be taking shape, sending prices upward yet again. An unofficial meeting was announced. Algiers, they said. “Stabilize the market” they said (which can apparently be done with talk, rather than production cuts). Russia chimed in, vacillating between joining the “market stabilization” efforts and not. We asked ourselves, this time ever more cautiously, dare we hope again? Most thought not, but speculators threw caution to the wind, moving markets this way and that on almost a daily basis in response to every utterance regarding the freeze.

Then the announcement came that OPEC had reached a deal. The earth shook, moving markets again — this time by a large percentage — and this time backed up by a more tangible hope.

Meanwhile, the industry scrambled to make sense of what it all meant. How big would the cut be? Which members would do the cutting? How did Saudi Arabia and Iran reach any kind of consensus when they were worlds apart — on multiple fronts? And then there was the ultimate question that had every analyst from here to Venezuela furiously figuring and calculating and refiguring and recalculating: just how high could prices go?

Speculators continued to largely disregard the ins and outs of the deal, which were absent at the time, and we saw markets tick up happily in response.

When the size of the production cut — between 240,000 and 740,000 barrels per day — was announced, one could feel the weight of the disappointment within the industry overall. The analysts wanted more; wanted deeper. Most OPEC members had been scrambling to reach record high oil production leading up to the meeting, some successful. Given current production levels, the small cut was seen by most analysts as a mere token gesture that would do very little to address what most would agree is the reason behind the price “problem” — the global supply glut.

And further skepticism surfaced over the fact that no specific member had agreed to any specific cut — they just agreed that as a group, “they” would do some cutting — some months down the road — and that the “they” in that equation wouldn’t be Iran. And it wouldn’t be Nigeria. And it wouldn’t be Libya.

And still, amid all this ambiguity and mystery, and with some distant promise to shave a mere 240,000 barrels of oil per day off OPEC’s record production figures, oil climbed above $50 a barrel. Today, Brent is trading at $52.64, which is a 12-month high-a monumental swing on mere talk.

And sure, some minor fundamentals have changed, such as five weeks of crude oil inventory draws in the U.S., but those inventory numbers are still way too high. In reality, OPEC hasn’t actually done anything to ease the glut. They’ve just talked… about talking… two months from now. In fact, the only actions that OPEC has taken is to pump oil at record paces, adding to the glut, and hoping that speculators will lap up what they’re dishing out in rhetoric. That’s what OPEC is doing today.

So happy are the markets on this wispy nothingness, in fact, that some are suggesting the oil markets are poised for a major meltdown, as speculators buy up contracts that are equal to a year’s worth of U.S. consumption — amounts that can’t possibly be delivered and will be pushed off to next month’s contracts or cancelled. To put this in perspective, there are 480 million barrels of oil on order for delivery in November to Cushing, Oklahoma — a facility that is capable of handling only 50 million per month.

What will also be pushed aside are some other cold, hard facts, such as Libya’s production increases, or Iraq’s, or Iran’s, and how fundamentally, this means the remaining OPEC members would have to make deeper cuts to offset these increases and still meet the organization’s promised cut. Deeper cuts that could hurt whichever member is tasked with taking on this burden.

But to keep the market’s eye on the OPEC ball despite market saturation, the Algerian Energy Minister, desperate to save his country from an economic collapse, made yet another announcement on behalf of OPEC that the bloc would be willing to cut yet another 1% “if we need to” on top of the cuts proposed out of the meeting in Algiers, adding that there would be even more meetings forthcoming — the first of which will be in Istanbul on Oct 9-13, again, on the sidelines of another energy meeting, the World Energy Congress. But this time, the informal talks about the freeze will include non-OPEC Russia and non-OPEC Azerbaijan.

As Reuters reports, the meeting signals that OPEC “is more serious now about managing the global supply glut.” Russia apparently doesn’t share this perceived seriousness, with Russia’s Energy Minister Alexander Novak saying on Friday that he doesn’t expect to sign a deal with OPEC during this meeting. Just more talk.

And yet another meeting is scheduled in Vienna for October 28 and 29, according to OPEC sources, followed by a “long-term strategy” meeting on November 1-4, and a technical meeting again in Vienna on November 23 and 24, and possibly a follow-up meeting of the High Level Committee a day later on November 25. Finally, recommendations will be presented at the previously disclosed and much anticipated meeting on November 30.

That’s plenty of evenly spaced talk that is sure to keep OPEC in media headlines, and give the oil speculators something to play with until that time. After that, it’s anyone’s guess as to how long prices will hold, but it’s likely that regardless of the outcome of the 30 November recommendation meeting, OPEC will continue to feed the beast with talk — and the market will readily accept the handout, even if it’s in lieu of the fundamentals.

By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com

…related: Victor Adair on why he is short oil: Live from the trading desk: The Big Themes Keep Making Money

Forecast Summary: Commodities, Forex and Stocks

We are getting closer to our long forecast drop in the commodities complex with the possibility of some important lows next year. WTI is still putting in a top, the dead cat bounce that has lasted throughout this year is running out of steam and we should see the push for lower lows over the next couple of months and in to 2017.

42732 a

We continue to forecast a period of Dollar and Yen strength over the next few months which will have an impact on many of the markets we forecast. We have been forecasting for some time that the the Pound would be the weakest of the major currencies going forward and we got our drop last week, a little earlier and deeper than forecast but none the less well within our forecast parameters.

We have also been forecasting a new down leg down in the Euro against the Dollar over the coming weeks and our forecast has remained on track for some time, there is still the possibility of a final rise before we fall.

42732 b

We are forecasting a correction in global stocks over the next six months, we think the SPX along with most of the major indices has either put in a top or is in the process of topping out, this fits in well with our commodity and forex forecasts.

Our S&P500 forecast has for some time been indicating that we are on the verge of a period of weakness it may take a few more weeks before we begin to see the market drop in earnest.

42732 c

We are currenly expecting a new down leg in commodities, a stronger Dollar and an even stronger Yen during the fourth quarter of this year, we anticipate these dynamics will create the conditions for some key markets to sell off for a period which will relieve some over bought conditions necessary for a healthy market.

Taking patterns in nature that repeat over different time frames like fractals as the basis for the forecast methodology, our forecast patterns can last for months and years, we create a most probable long term fractal pattern and then continually test it and model it over multiple time frames to ensure the pattern remains a probable event.

You can follow our short term forecasts on our web site.