Energy & Commodities

Investors Shunning the World’s Richest Mineral Deposits

chart mineral resources global reserve estimatesSouth Africa has the world’s richest mineral deposits, with $3.3 trillion in platinum, gold, iron ore and coal. That’s not enough to satisfy investors.

“Citigroup Inc. in 2010 ranked South Africa the world’s richest nation by commodity wealth, with more than $2.5 trillion in mineral reserves, 56 percent more than second-placed Russia. The standings probably haven’t changed since then because of the slow rate of “resource exhaustion,” Craig Sainsbury, who wrote the Citigroup report, said by e-mail on Oct. 1. He now works for Goldman Sachs & Co.”

Extended labor strikes, aging mines and regulatory uncertainty have dragged the stock-market values of South African miners to a four-year low compared with global peers. At the start of 2013, the stocks traded with almost no discount.

“Companies in the 104-member Bloomberg World Mining Index are trading at 14.8 times estimated earnings while those in the 16-member FTSE/JSE Africa Mining Index of South African commodities stocks are at 12.3 times projected earnings. ‘

The shifting investor sentiment….

…..continue reading HERE

The History of Metals

We have documented the history if individual metals before and we have also visualized their annual production. However, we have not seen all of the metals on one timeline before such as in this infographic.

Worth noting is gold’s prominence ever since the beginning of history. Because the yellow metal is one of the rare elements that can be found in native form (such as nuggets), it was used by the earliest of our ancestors.

Comparatively, it is only recently that the technology has advanced to allow us to discover or extract the rest of the metals on today’s periodic table. For example, even though we knew of titanium as early as 1791, it was relatively useless all the way up until the 1940′s because of its metallurgy. In the 20th century, scientists advanced a way to remove the impurities, making it possible to get the strong and hard titanium we know today.

Another standout fact is that it took all the way until the early 19th century for two very important elements to be discovered. Both are not found free in nature very often and thus slipped detection for many centuries. Silicon, which actually makes up 26% of the earth’s crust, was discovered in 1823. Then in 1827, aluminum was discovered – we now know today that it is the most common metal in the earth’s crust (it’s actually 1200X more abundant than copper).

history-of-metals-infographic

Original graphic from: Makin Metals

 

10 Natural Resource Stocks: “Reality at a Discount”:

Catalyst Check: Natural Resources Watchlist at Three Months

At the Cambridge House Canadian Investment Conference in June, The Gold Report Publisher Jason Mallin asked a panel of experts picking a portfolio of stocks with upside potential for the 2014 Streetwise Reports Natural Resources Watchlist what they wanted to see in an equity. As always, Sprott US Holdings Inc. CEO Rick Rule, summed up the ideal beautifully. “We like reality at a discount,” he said. Now that three months have passed, we decided to check in with Rick and co-panelists Joe Mazumdar from Canaccord Genuity and Keith Schaefer from Oil & Gas Investments Bulletin to see how that reality is playing out. You can always check the portfolio in real time at the Portfolio Tracker.

RCdrill580The Gold Report: Joe, some of your picks from the Natural Resources Watchlist have performed quite well. Do you want to give us some updates?

Joe Mazumdar: Junior mining sector equities in the gold space, as proxied for by the Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ:NYSE.MKT), have outperformed gold since the June Cambridge House conference. The inter-period high for gold was $1,335–1,340/ounce ($1,335–1.340/oz), about a 7% return. Gold is down about 3% since the conference, on the back of a strong U.S. dollar.

The benchmark Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF experienced an inter-period high of about $45/share, generating a 30%+ return since the conference. But it is currently flat again. On both metrics, the ETF has outperformed the gold price. Our selections averaged an inter-period high of 50%, which included underperformers (+18–26%) and some significant outperformers (+70–115%). Currently, the average return for our selection since the conference is a more modest 14–15%. [NOTE: Figures cited were current 9/30/14.]

TGR: During that panel discussion, you called explorers a lottery ticket and Cayden Resources Inc. (CYD:TSX.V; CDKNF:OTCQX) was a lottery ticket that paid off. What was your other “lottery ticket” pick?

1Screen Shot 2014-10-07 at 1.32.27 PM

JM: Exploration stories tend to be for the more risk-tolerant investors, potentially an “educated” guess rather than a lottery ticket. Our other exploration story was Cordoba Minerals Corp. (CDB:TSX.V). Cordoba Minerals underperformed, both with respect to inter-period highs (+18%) and current return (-54%) since the June conference. A diamond drilling program (2,000 meters [2,000m]) began at the San Matias copper-gold project in Colombia in mid-July 2014, targeting anomalies from a 5,000m, shallow hole, rotary air blast (RAB) drill program. Results are still pending. The only reported results were from RAB drilling at the Costa Azul prospect, which returned 19m grading 0.74 grams/ton gold (0.74 g/t) and 0.32% copper in early August 2014.

Downward pressure on the stock is, in part, due to the lack of news flow. We consider this to be a long-term exploration play, seeking to prove up a cluster of gold-rich porphyry systems that have returned up to 101m grading 1.0% Cu and 0.54 g/t Au from previous drilling. In terms of infrastructure, its location in the northern part of Colombia, at a low elevation with two operating open pit mines located nearby and abundant roads, ports and power, is also attractive.

TGR: What about the more developed picks you have under coverage? The Watchlist was all about catalysts. Did these companies hit their catalysts or is there good news to come?

2Screen Shot 2014-10-07 at 1.32.45 PM

JM: Roxgold Inc. (ROG:TSX.V) is well financed to production at its Yaramoko gold project in Burkina Faso, West Africa, expected by the first half of 2016. The catalysts are a blend of milestones from derisking its development timeline and quantifying the upside on its substantial land package. The company has managed to deliver on both fronts since the conference.

With respect to the development timeline, Roxgold derisked some of the financing, technical and execution risk by securing a US$75 million (US$75M) project debt facility, having its environment and social impact assessment approved, and awarding the underground mining contracting to a reputable firm with relevant underground experience in West Africa. Also, on the exploration front, the drill program at Bagassi South intersected 39.6 g/t gold over 4.5m. We believe Roxgold will continue to quantify the upside on its land package.

Despite these releases, the stock underperformed the Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF with respect to its inter-period high (+23% versus +30%), but has outperformed it since (+5.6% versus +0.4%). Some of the drag on the stock may be related to additional financing required to bring the project into production. We have modeled an additional equity financing to support the project’s development.

In our opinion, few projects offer the high internal rate of return that the Yaramoko project does due to its high grade (>10 g/t Au) and low throughput (740–750 tons per day), requiring low upfront capital (US$110–120M) to get it into production. The high return should attract investors to the name in a volatile gold price environment. We have Roxgold on our Canaccord Genuity Focus List.

3Screen Shot 2014-10-07 at 1.33.21 PM

Rubicon Minerals Corp. (RBY:NYSE.MKT; RMX:TSX) is financed to go into production in H2/15 at its wholly-owned Phoenix gold project (F2 Zone), which lies within the highly sought Red Lake District of northwest Ontario. Similar to Roxgold, Rubicon Minerals has two streams of catalysts. The catalysts are related to production timeline and drilling, both infill and definition, to better define the mineable resource.

Since the June conference, to further quantify the upside potential, the company raised additional funds (CA$12M in flow-through financing) to support exploration, and added a new vice president of exploration. Recently, the company announced an intersection of 136.5 g/t Au over 4m from the infill program, which has found additional mineralization outside currently modeled stope blocks. On the development front, Rubicon continued to maintain its guidance for production by mid-2015, in line with our forecast. Preproduction capital left to spend is approximately CA$132M. As of the end of August 2014, the company had about CA$158M in cash, with an additional US$45M expected from its streaming transaction with Royal Gold (RGL:TSX).

Rubicon Minerals easily outperformed the Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF, both in the inter-period high (+68% versus +30%) and to date (+31% versus +0.4%), as Phoenix represents a high grade (8.0 g/t Au) underground gold project that is well financed to near-term production in a prime jurisdiction) and a highly sought gold district.

4Screen Shot 2014-10-07 at 1.33.42 PM

Dalradian Resources Inc. (DNA:TSX) is an advanced explorer that is metamorphosing into a developer at its wholly owned Curraghinalt high-grade (8.0 g/t Au) underground gold project in Northern Ireland.

Dalradian Resources underperformed the Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF both in the inter-period high (+26% versus +30%) and to date (-8% versus +0.4%), as the company had to await financing. It raised CA$27M in late July 2014 to fund its underground exploration program (CA$30M, 12–15 months), which will underpin a prefeasibility study in H2/15. On a positive note, the financing was both upsized and overallotted. Not many junior mining companies have experienced demand on that level in 2014.

The underground exploration program will verify continuity of grade and thickness of the gold-bearing structures, provide confidence in the chosen mining method as it assesses underground geotechnical and hydrogeological conditions, and generate samples for metallurgical testing. These derisking catalysts will combine with an updated scoping study expected in Q4/15, based on the 2014 resource update. From a permitting perspective, the impacts of underground mining will be simulated during the underground exploration program.

We remain concerned about the usage of cyanide in Northern Ireland, and have removed it from our modeled flow sheet. In our project plan for Curraghinalt, the project produces gold through a gravity circuit and a flotation circuit, generating a gold-bearing concentrate that is shipped overseas, thus avoiding the use of cyanide at the site, which we believe would be less problematic to permit.

We have modeled the company as a takeout candidate, but only after a potential suitor would be confident that an underground mining operation can work on that scale in Northern Ireland, with a prefeasibility complete and a permit in hand.

TGR: Is the recent $590,000 grant from the Northern Ireland government a good sign on the permitting front?

JM: Yes. The government had already granted the permit for bulk tonnage sampling in early 2014. And the recent grant is a positive sign that the government wants jobs in Northern Ireland, and believes that this is a good project with a capable management team that can generate meaningful local employment.

TGR: It has been three months since that conference. If you were to pick again, is there another company you would have added to the list?

JM: Hindsight is 20-20. One company that I visited recently that I would have added isConstantine Metal Resources Ltd. (CEM:TSX.V), which is advancing the Palmer massive volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) exploration project in southeast Alaska.

Constantine recently intersected 89m (calculated true width) grading 0.79% copper, 5.03% zinc, 21.2 g/t Ag and 0.32 g/t Au that tested an electromagnetic (geophysical) conductor at the South Wall zone at the Palmer volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposit in southeast Alaska. Dowa Metals & Mining Co. Ltd., a Japanese mining and smelting company, is earning in to a 49% stake by spending US$22M over a four-year earn in schedule. 2014 is the second year of the earn-in. The attraction is the quality of the potential zinc concentrate, and the proximity to infrastructure. Drilling is seeking to increase the tonnage at the project to a critical 8–10 million ton (8–10 Mt) threshold. The project is located on a significant north-south trending belt called the Alexander Terrane, which stretches from British Columbia, through Alaska, and back into British Columbia. The belt also hosts the Windy Craggy deposit and the Greens Creek mine, an underground VMS deposit operated by Hecla Mining Co. (HL:NYSE).

I do not cover the company, but given the forecast deficits in the zinc market, high-grade projects such as the Palmer project (4.75 Mt grading 1.84% copper, 4.57% zinc, 29 g/t silver and 0.28 g/t gold) that are close to infrastructure—a half-hour from the deep-water port at Haines, Alaska—will be in demand. Hence Dowa’s interest—but note that Constantine retains a majority interest (51%) after the earn-in.

TGR: It sounds like Constantine has a lot more going for it than your average lottery ticket.

JM: In the current environment, grassroots exploration companies are finding it difficult to attract financing to generate catalysts. Projects that are more advanced may be a better option in the near to medium term; projects that have the financing support to generate the catalysts required to move forward.

TGR: Rick, would you update us on the companies you called out on the panel?

Rick Rule: Sprott Inc. (SII:TSX) has $10 billion ($10B) in investments, overwhelmingly in the natural resources space. When the sector recovers—as it has five times in my career—this is a portfolio that will do very well.

5Screen Shot 2014-10-07 at 1.34.02 PM

Devon Energy Corp. (DVN:NYSE) has done very well since we bought it a year and a half ago. Depending on your opinion of the U.S. economy, you might put a trailing stop on it, or sell it now. I believe energy prices are soft right now because I don’t believe we are seeing a U.S. recovery, and oil and gas prices are leveraged to the economy. As a company, Devon is making the right moves internally. It is shedding nonperforming assets and holding down costs, but it can’t control energy prices.

6Screen Shot 2014-10-07 at 1.34.25 PM

Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. (IVN:TSX) is a stock for an investor who is financially and psychologically capable of holding an equity for two, three or four years. This isn’t one that is going to move up in three months. It is up against a lot of challenges, including platinum and palladium group metals (PGM) commodity prices, country risk, and the ability to raise money in the current environment. I will tell you that PGM prices have to go up. And CEO Robert Friedland is a man who has succeeded before in difficult geographic locations. He can raise the millions required. Extraordinary stories fund themselves.

But Ivanhoe is going to take time. This is not a stock for traders. This is for long-term investors who can hold until the time is right.

TGR: Keith, would you give us an update on your companies?

7Screen Shot 2014-10-07 at 1.34.50 PM

Keith Schaefer: NXT Energy Solutions Inc. (SFD:TSX.V; NSFDF:OTCBB) is an airborne geological survey company that finds oil and gas reservoirs. The stock is moving, but not because of any news the company has put out. The Street is excited about Mexico’s planned liberalization of the oil industry, anticipating that opening the sector to foreign investment will mean bigger contracts for services like airborne geological surveys, and those contracts being awarded faster. It is a powerful story. As I said in June, the company has a neat technology that is proven out in the field.

8Screen Shot 2014-10-07 at 1.35.22 PM

Lynden Energy Corp. (LVL:TSX.V) is an oil and gas exploration company with the Wolfberry and Mitchell Ranch projects in Texas. The stock had a great run in August for two reasons. Management has been vocal about wanting to sell, and the company owns five–six chunks of land in the Permian Basin in West Texas, the epicenter of some huge wells that have recently been drilled. The Street likes this area all of a sudden. It really is a great land package.

9Screen Shot 2014-10-07 at 1.35.50 PM

rdx Technologies Corp. (RDX:TSX.V) has a system that takes waste fluid streams from oil and gas operations, and turns that into diesel fuel. It is trying to franchise that technology and grow the company. But it has a lot of work ahead of it. It has had challenges and the stock price reflects that.

10Screen Shot 2014-10-07 at 1.36.14 PM

Chinook Energy Inc. (CKE:TSX.V) is an oil and gas exploration and production company with property in western Canada. Since the panel discussion in June, Chinook delivered on its catalyst, and sold its Tunisian asset. Management is now working on consolidating. The stock has bounced up and down in the $2/share range for the last three months.

TGR: After three months, is there anything you would have said differently from that stage?

KS: What I know now that I didn’t know then is that we were at the top of the market. I would have told everyone to sell everything.

No one can really predict where the market is going. The energy market has been ugly and will have to rebase. But some of these companies could do well in the process.

Joe Mazumdar joined Canaccord Genuity in December 2012 from Haywood Securities, where he also was a senior mining analyst focused on the junior gold market. The majority of his experience is with industry including corporate roles as director of strategic planning, corporate development at Newmont in Denver and senior market analyst/trader at Phelps Dodge in Phoenix. Mazumdar worked in technical roles for IAMGold in Ecuador, North Minerals in Argentina/Chile and Peru, RTZ Mining and Exploration in Argentina and MIM Exploration and Mining in Queensland, Australia, among others. Mazumdar has a Bachelor of Science degree in geology from the University of Alberta, a Master of Science degree in geology and mining from James Cook University and a Master of Science degree in mineral economics from the Colorado School of Mines.

Rick Rule, CEO of Sprott US Holdings Inc., began his career in the securities business in 1974. He is a leading American retail broker specializing in mining, energy, water utilities, forest products and agriculture. His company has built a national reputation on taking advantage of global opportunities in the oil and gas, mining, alternative energy, agriculture, forestry and water industries. Rule writes a free, thrice-weekly e-letter, Sprott’s Thoughts.

Keith Schaefer is editor and publisher of the Oil & Gas Investments Bulletin,which finds, researches and profiles growing oil and gas companies that Schaefer buys himself. He identifies oil and gas companies that have high, or potentially high growth rates, and that are covered by several research analysts. He has a degree in journalism and has worked for several Canadian dailies, but has spent more than 15 years assisting public resource companies in raising exploration and expansion capital.

Want to read more Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviews page.

Related Articles

 

 

DISCLOSURE: 
1) JT Long conducted this interview for Streetwise Reports LLC, publisher of The Gold Report, The Energy Report, The Life Sciences Report and The Mining Report, and provides services to Streetwise Reports as an employee. She owns, or her family owns, shares of the company mentioned in this interview: None.
2) Joe Mazumdar: I own, or my family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I personally am, or my family is, paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: Dalradian Resources Inc. and Rubicon Minerals Corp. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I determined and had final say over what companies would be included in the interview based on my research, understanding of the sector and interview theme. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview. 
3) Keith Schaefer: I own, or my family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: rdx Technologies Corp., NXT Energy Solutions Inc., Chinook Energy Inc. and Lynden Energy Corp. I personally am, or my family is, paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview. I determined and had final say over what companies would be included in the interview based on my research, understanding of the sector and interview theme.
4) Rick Rule: I own, or my family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: Sprott Inc. I personally am, or my family is, paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: Sprott Inc. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. Sprott funds owns shares of Randgold Resources Ltd., Goldcorp Inc., Potash Corp., Cameco Corp., BHP Billiton Ltd., Devon Energy Corp. and Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview. I determined and had final say over what companies would be included in the interview based on my research, understanding of the sector and interview theme.
5) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of Streetwise Reports: Cayden Resources Inc. The companies mentioned in this interview were not involved in any aspect of the interview preparation or post-interview editing so the expert can speak independently about the sector. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services.
6) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts’ statements without their consent. 
7) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer.
8) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise during the up-to-four-week interval from the time of the interview until after it publishes.

 

 

CRB Heading Into Its Three-Year Cycle Low

Now that oil has made a lower intermediate low warning bells are ringing that the commodity complex has more than likely begun the move down into its three-year cycle low. That bottom isn’t due until May or June of next year at the earliest.

1-crb-three-year-cycle-low

With the larger three year cycle forces now in control, and the commodity complex in decline, intermediate cycle lows (ICL’s) will tend to be exceptionally vicious affairs. We are already seeing this play out in the gold market as it tests (and will probably break below) the $1180 support zone sometime next week. Silver and platinum have already broken below their summer 2013 lows, and it should only be a matter of time before gold follows. This is going to cause a major panic in the gold bug community, and that is to be expected during ICL’s with the CRB now in the grip of its three-year cycle decline.

2-gold-CRB

Now before one gets too bearish and starts to short the commodity complex willy-nilly, remember that we are close to an intermediate cycle low here and we’re going to get a convincing countertrend rally soon. Just understand that the rally is almost certainly going to fail to make new highs and will ultimately roll over and move down into the three-year cycle low next summer. And as scary and frustrating as the current intermediate decline is, the upcoming decline next summer is going to be a nightmare of catastrophic proportions for commodity investors. As I have been suggesting for months now I think traders need to focus mainly on the stock market for the next 8-12 months and let the commodity sector finish the move down into its three-year cycle low.

During this period, as commodity prices trend generally lower, a tailwind for the economy will be created as living expenses will decrease giving consumers more money for discretionary spending. Input costs for businesses will decline causing profit margins to expand. All in all, I think this could create the environment for stocks to deliver a final parabolic blow-off top at roughly the same time that the CRB hits its three-year cycle low.

Now for the silver lining. At bear market bottoms, which we are going to get in the commodity and gold markets sometime next summer, valuations will reach levels that have no basis in reality. They will be purely driven by irrational fear. For those that can bide their time, wait patiently, and get to a bear market bottom with their cash intact, this is where real opportunities are created.

I believe at the next major multiyear cycle bottom next summer, we are going to see an opportunity in the commodity complex, especially in precious metal mining stocks, that only comes around once every 40 or 50 years. This is the spot where millionaires and billionaires will be created for those with the ability to buy at that bottom.

3-bear-market-bottom

I suggest resource investors curb their animal spirits for now, and focus on the stock market. Our time will come. We just need to make sure we get to the bottom with our capital intact.

 

 

For more in-depth analysis of how these larger cycles are likely to unfold, consider a subscription to the nightly SMT newsletter.

The Fracking Revolution & Companies Poised to Gain

We Will Never Stop Importing Oil, but We May Start Exporting

Screen Shot 2014-10-03 at 6.10.39 AMHorizontal drilling and fracking have opened new opportunities for investing in domestic energy, whether for pure-play explorers in developing shales, producers in mature areas, or service companies opening up the monster wells. Oil and Gas Investor Editor-in-Chief Leslie Haines has been following the revolution for nine years, and agreed to share with readers of The Energy Report the names of some beneficiaries of new technology’s multiplier effect.

Companies BelowConcho Resources: Emerge Energy Services: Hi-Crush Partners: Marathon Oil Corp.: Oasis Petroleum: Pioneer Natural Resources: Sanchez Energy: US Silica

 

The Energy ReportAs editor-in-chief of Oil and Gas Investorbased in Houston, you follow the development of U.S. shale closely. Is the U.S. really on track to energy independence, or will depletion rates cut this boom short? What are the production numbers telling you?

Leslie Haines: I have been covering shale development since 2005, and it looks like we are on track for energy independence by 2020 or so. However, we’re never going to stop importing oil because supply diversity is prudent.

Depletion rates are significant in every shale play. Some of the depletion rates are quite steep in the early years of a play, but wells tend to produce for 20 years or so at a lower rate, so overall production rates are still growing.

Screen Shot 2014-10-03 at 6.18.14 AMThe monthly U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reports show that in H1/14, U.S. gas natural production alone increased by more than 4 billion cubic feet a day (4 Bcf/d). The bulk is coming from the Northeast, from the Marcellus and Utica plays in Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia. Also, a lot of new natural gas is coming on, in association with oil production in West Texas, in the Permian Basin, and in south Texas, in the Eagle Ford play. While some gas areas might be declining, we’re getting enough new natural gas to offset that decline. In fact, both oil and natural gas production in this country are the highest they’ve been in about 35 years.

 

Natural gas in storage was down last year, and now we’re refilling. Every summer and fall, you refill storage to prepare for winter. It looks like we’re going to have a lot of gas in storage. We’ve had a fairly mild summer and haven’t had a huge call for natural gas for air conditioning, compared to what it could have been. Between the production and the weather factors, it looks like we’ll have plenty of gas in storage for the fall.

 

TER: How will the development of monster wells, as they’re being called, impact that balance?

LH: When we say monster well, we are referring to an above-average initial flow. We’re seeing this happen in the Utica play in West Virginia and southern Ohio. Some very large dry-gas wells are being reported with initial flows of 20–25 million cubic feet of gas a day (20–25 MMcf/d). That’s a huge gas well by anybody’s measure. It is just one more example of U.S. production surging due to horizontal drilling and fracking. Those two techniques combined have revolutionized everything in this country and allowed us to recover a lot more of the underground reservoir.

TER: The techniques continue to develop as more environmentally friendly and efficient methods are discovered. What are some new techniques you are seeing?

LH: The size of the average frack is getting quite a bit bigger. It used to be that the horizontal leg might only go out 1,000–2,000 feet (1,000–2,000 ft). Now, it’s going out as far as 5,000–7,000 ft horizontally, so the well bore is exposed to more of the reservoir. The size of the fracks has also gotten bigger, with 20 or 30 frack stages along a lateral. That has increased production.

Screen Shot 2014-10-03 at 6.18.23 AMIn one basin, you may find the number of formations that can be tapped is quite numerous. In the Permian Basin of West Texas, for example, more than 5,000 vertical feet of pay can be tapped. If you sink three horizontal legs into that well, three different horizons can be fracked and produce from one well. It triples the effect of that well and acreage.

TER: What’s an example of a company taking advantage of that multiplier effect?

LH: Two good examples are Pioneer Natural Resources Co. (PXD:NYSE) and Concho Resources Inc. (CXO:NYSE) in the Permian Basin. Production is soaring. In fact, Pioneer is one of the companies that recently received special permission from the government to export a little bit of condensate as a test case. Pioneer is a very active proponent of exporting crude.

TER: Is the company testing price impact, or market demand, or something else?

LH: All of the above. The company is trying to prove to the government that we need to be able to export crude oil in addition to refined products like gasoline. It is very controversial.

TER: In the absence of exporting, are we producing too much? The EIA’s Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report showed 2,801 Bcf at the beginning of September. Is oversupply keeping the price of natural gas down?

LH: A lot of Wall Street analysts have reduced their outlooks for oil and gas pricing—and company earnings projections—through the rest of this year and into next year. For example, Bernstein Research just came out with a report in which it is bringing down its natural gas price estimate for 2015 from $4.50/thousand cubic feet ($4.50/Mcf) to $4/Mcf. It plans to leave the price there through 2016.

We are seeing such an incredible surge in supply of both oil and gas that producers, analysts and investors are starting to get a little bit worried. We had very high natural gas prices a few years ago, and then the surge of new production, combined with a mild winter, made the price of natural gas go right back down. At one point, natural gas was below $4/Mcf. It’s come back a little this year, but there is still quite a bit of concern.

TER: Are today’s prices less than what it costs to pull the oil out of the ground?

LH: Producers are still making money, but the prices for drilling and fracking are inching up because there’s so much demand for wells to be drilled and fracked.

TER: You sat on a panel at the Stansberry Society conference in Dallas with S&A Resource Report newsletter writer Matt Badiali earlier this year to talk about the future of shale. He divides the shales into mature (the Bakken and the Eagle Ford), and developing (the Tuscaloosa, Utica and Cline areas). Are investors rewarding companies with shale play diversity, or is it considered smarter to master one shale type?

LH: The stock market used to reward companies for diversity. Investors wanted to see a balance between oil and gas, and two, three or four different project areas. However, that has changed. Now investors favor pure-play companies. A company like Oasis Petroleum Inc. (OAS:NYSE), which is in just one play, the Bakken, has done very well in the last year.

Screen Shot 2014-10-03 at 6.18.31 AMSanchez Energy Corp. (SN:NYSE), which is in the Eagle Ford and Tuscaloosa Marine Shale, is not being rewarded for the Mississippi project yet. The Tuscaloosa play is still developing, and hasn’t proven to be economic yet. The company has some expensive wells with downhole technical challenges. The players in that area are still working on solving the geology. In the Eagle Ford, however, Sanchez is very experienced and successful. That part of its business is well recognized.

But, in general, I would say that diversity is not being rewarded in the market at this time. It’s better for companies to focus on two or three plays at the most, and in well-established areas like the Bakken, the Eagle Ford and the Marcellus.

TER: Are there still upside opportunities in the established shales?

LH: The Marcellus Formation is considered the second largest gas field in the world. Production keeps growing every quarter. It’s difficult for a company to get in there now. Most of the lease positions are already carved out. Companies have gone beyond finding the sweet spots, and are focusing on two things. One is how to drill a more efficient well faster, while reducing costs. The other is infrastructure. The Marcellus and Utica plays are constrained because there is not enough pipeline to get all the gas to market. A ton of midstream projects have been proposed and are underway. Billions of dollars are being spent to build pipeline infrastructure to move the gas not only to the population centers in the northeast, but also to eastern Canada. Some of the gas is going to be piped down to the petrochemical plants on the Gulf Coast. Some of the gas is even being piped to the West, to Chicago and beyond.

TER: This sounds like more of a manufacturing operation, now that companies don’t seem to be drilling dry holes anymore. Who are the main players?

LH: Companies like Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. (COG:NYSE)Range Resources Corp. (RRC:NYSE)Chesapeake Energy Corp. (CHK:NYSE)Petroleum Development Corp. (PETD:NASDAQ) and EQT Corp. (EQT:NYSE) are doing quite well in the Marcellus. The same thing is true in the Bakken, the Eagle Ford and the Permian Basin. Some 20 companies may drill a play, but a handful do most of the work. And they are the bigger companies.

TER: Do you envision mergers and acquisitions in that space, as some of these companies mature?

LH: It’s really about the play maturing. We see a similar pattern in every shale play. Companies decide that a play is relatively mature, and that they can make a higher return somewhere else. They put their assets on the market, sell to somebody else in that play or to a master limited partnership (MLP), and then redeploy their money into another play that might have a faster growth trajectory.

TER: What is a recent example of that?

LH: Marathon Oil Corp. (MRO:NYSE) sold its North Sea assets to redeploy more capital to the Eagle Ford, which has much higher returns.

TER: You wrote a September cover story on service and supply companies, which is one way investors are leveraging the oil and gas industry. Are margins increasing in that business?

LH: It looks like they’re about to, yes. Almost 1,900 rigs are drilling in this country at any given time. I’d say 90% of those wells will need to be fracked. That is an enormous demand for rig crews, frack crews and all the associated equipment and materials. Last year, about 17 million hydraulic horsepower was installed. The amount of horsepower available for fracking has probably doubled in the last five years. Everything is bigger, longer, higher pressure—more, more, more. Service companies have pricing power because there is such a frenzy of activity right now.

TER: There are many types of service companies. Is there one part of that industry that’s growing faster than the others?

LH: One bright spot is in companies that provide sand for fracking. They’ve been doing extremely well in the marketplace. Their stocks are way up, and they keep adding new capacity, to deliver yet more sand to the marketplace for fracking. The oil field service index, PHLX Oil Service Sector (OSX:NASDAQ), has risen steadily since January, and the hottest subsector seems to be the frack sand providers. Some of them have tripled in the past 12 months.

TER: What are some examples of solid frack sand providers?

LH: US Silica Holdings (SLCA:NYSE)Hi-Crush Partners LP (HCLP:NYSE) and Emerge Energy Services LP (EMES:NYSE) are three. Their revenues mirror the increase in drilling activity, which could be 14% in the next year. That is why analysts are telling us that it looks like profit margins have come off their lows, and service prices are starting to rise again.

TER: Thank you for taking the time to talk to us.

LH: Thank you.

Leslie Haines is editor-in-chief of Oil and Gas Investor magazine. She began her journalism career in 1980 in Williston, North Dakota, at the Williston Daily Herald. She was the energy and business reporter for the Midland Reporter-Telegram in Midland, Texas, in 1982 and 1983. She joined Hart Energy Publishing in Denver in late 1983 as a copy editor. Soon thereafter she began writing for Western Oil and Gas World. In 1985, she joined the staff of Oil and Gas Investormagazine. She was named managing editor two years later, and became editor in January 1992. In November 1992, the Independent Petroleum Association of America awarded Haines with the 2nd Annual Lloyd Unsell Award for Excellence in Petroleum Journalism. She is a former president of the Houston Producers’ Forum, and is on the board of the Houston Energy Finance Discussion Group.

Want to read more Energy Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviews page.

Related Articles

 

 

DISCLOSURE:
1) JT Long conducted this interview for Streetwise Reports LLC, publisher of The Gold Report, The Energy Report, The Life Sciences Report and The Mining Report, and provides services to Streetwise Reports as an independent contractor. She owns, or his family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. 
2) Leslie Haines: I own, or my family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I personally am, or my family is, paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I determined and had final say over what companies would be included in the interview based on my research, understanding of the sector and interview theme. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview. 
3) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of Streetwise Reports: None. The companies mentioned in this interview were not involved in any aspect of the interview preparation or post-interview editing so the expert could speak independently about the sector. 
4) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts’ statements without their consent. 
5) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer
6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise during the up-to-four-week interval from the time of the interview until after it publishes.