Gold & Precious Metals
One question that has not been asked sufficiently is,“How can China buy well over 2,000 tonnes of gold without sending the gold price rocketing?”
In the U.S. people believe that the gold price will fall even further in 2014 despite indications that Chinese demand will continue at current high levels if not rise even more. This is because U.S. investors have been selling gold to move into the rising equity market. With the developed world focused on events in its own part of the world it is assumed that their influence will dominate the financial world including gold. But this ignores events in the emerging world and their hunger for gold.
With ‘normal’ annual supply to the gold market around 4,000 tonnes annually you would have thought that such a heavy Chinese demand would have propelled gold prices higher. But it didn’t. We have explained why in earlier articles last year. We will write more about this in the future, but in this article we will look at just why the Chinese prefer to see low prices continue.
There are two primary reasons why they want low prices to continue:
1) It encourages Chinese retail demand. – With Chinese middle class numbers set to rise considerably as the government there pushes their growth emphasis to the service sector, more and more Chinese will save and a good proportion of that will go into gold. So low gold prices will accelerate the volume of gold bought. Higher prices lower the overall volume of gold bought. The nouveau riche of China will invests in relation to the size of their disposable income, so the more gold they can afford with that, the greater the total volume bought.
2) It has increased the supply of gold to China. – Low gold prices has discouraged developed world demand and encouraged more selling of gold in 2013, making a greater volume of gold supply to be made available for the Chinese to buy as it implies that the rest of the world’s gold demand remains subdued. Add to this is the choking off of Indian demand since August 2013, taking the now second largest gold buyer out of the market. Over a year this would remove 800+ tonnes of demand from the market.
As simple market theory tells us, the greater the demand over supply is, the higher gold prices will rise. So how can one buy gold in huge quantities without driving up gold prices? The answer has to be by buying gold outside the market and not buying in the market where gold prices are set. Another answer is to ensure that where one does buy in a market where prices are set, one buys “on the dip”. In other words don’t buy when prices are rising, buy when they are falling and only take the gold that is on offer in the market.
Market Fragmentation
We know that China has and is buying gold mines and can direct the gold of those mines straight to China.
We also know that many gold producers, such as South Africa, are not bound to sell their gold to the London market or direct it to any market [such as they sold to the ‘gold pool’ in the seventies] in particular but can sell to anyone they want.
Traditionally, bullion banks made buying commitments to certain mints and producers to supply gold on a long-term basis, but today they do not have the same hold on newly mined gold, which can go to any solid buyer. A client like a non-banking Chinese importer for large quantities over a lengthy period is as attractive a client now as the bullion bank.
The price paid to the supplier is referenced to the market prices at the time of delivery. Because the gold does not pass through the London gold market it no longer plays a part in determining prices. The more gold that is bought that way [off market], the smaller the London/New York market becomes.
This leaves market like London and its five bullion banks pricing gold on the basis of only part of the global market, so not truly reflecting global demand and supply. If both demand and supply in the traditional markets, such as London, is lackluster the gold prices set there will continue to look weak, despite the massive and rising demand elsewhere.
Indian demand is routed through London, so the loss of such a big buyer knocked the stuffing out of London’s demand. Add to that U.S. selling [also routed through HSBC to London] and it is no wonder that prices fell in 2013. Should Indian demand return once more then gold prices will turn higher.
The loss of traditional demand from India and the additional supply of gold from the U.S. has supported falling or stable low gold prices in London and will continue to do so, ignoring Chinese demand.
We have no doubt that China will continue to buy in a way so as to be a neutral influence on gold prices in 2014.
Agreement between the U.S. and China for lower gold prices?
Some commentators believe there is an agreement between China and the U.S. to suppress gold prices. It is a matter of history that the U.S. does not want gold to be seen as money, but wants the world to believe that the dollar is. China is moving towards elevating the Yuan to a position of a global reserve currency. It appreciates the monetary turbulence that this will bring as the Yuan challenges the dollar and becomes part of a multi-currency reserve currency system. That’s why it is buying gold as a factor that will give the Yuan global credibility. China, once it has acquired a certain level of gold reserves [it will keep increasing them after this point is reached], has every interest in seeing the gold price rise to a point where it is a reflection of true value, whereas the U.S. does not.
Consequently, the two do not have the same objectives or interests as the other. Hence, there can be no agreement between the two to suppress gold. Rather, China is taking advantage of the current state of the gold market and the persistent selling of gold from the U.S. based gold Exchange Traded Funds to acquire the gold that is being sold ‘on the dips’, so as to not drive gold prices higher.
In the next article we will look at how long China can keep their influence on the gold price as little as we see now.
Hold your gold in such a way that governments and banks can’t seize it!
Visit: www.stockbridgeMgMt.com And Enquire @admin@StockbridgeMgMt.com
Subscribe @
Legal Notice / Disclaimer
This document is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment. Gold Forecaster – Global Watch / Julian D. W. Phillips / Peter Spina, have based this document on information obtained from sources it believes to be reliable but which it has not independently verified; Gold Forecaster – Global Watch / Julian D. W. Phillips / Peter Spina make no guarantee, representation or warranty and accepts no responsibility or liability as to its accuracy or completeness. Expressions of opinion are those of Gold Forecaster – Global Watch / Julian D. W. Phillips / Peter Spina only and are subject to change without notice. Gold Forecaster – Global Watch / Julian D. W. Phillips / Peter Spina assume no warranty, liability or guarantee for the current relevance, correctness or completeness of any information provided within this Report and will not be held liable for the consequence of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained herein or any omission. Furthermore, we assume no liability for any direct or indirect loss or damage or, in particular, for lost profit, which you may incur as a result of the use and existence of the information, provided within this Report.

2013 was no doubt quite a bad year for gold investors. The huge sellout was a primary reason for this. Yet despite this major change in long positions, the outlook for gold does not seem bad. In the second part of 2013 a big debate about the central bank’s policy was initiated. It was all about Bernankish interventions in the financial market, which resulted in the explosion in the Fed’s balance sheet from billions to trillions of dollars. Since 2008 it was no doubt a huge transformation, and one that had a long lasting influence until the present day.
As we last presented our Market Overview the Fed decided to adjust its activity in the financial markets. As we’ve also seen the decision was much in the spirit of “how much do we have to change in order not to change anything?” The very serious issue to be discussed was the so called “tapering”. And apparently it finally happened. The Fed decided to back out from its policy of expansionary buying programs. What does this seeming backing out look like today? We can read in the Federal Open Market Committee statement in December 2013: “Beginning in January, the Committee will add to its holdings of agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of $35 billion per month rather than $40 billion per month, and will add to its holdings of longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of $40 billion per month rather than $45 billion per month”.
In other words, every month the Fed will print 5 billion dollars less than in the past to buy additional government securities, and 5 billion dollars less each month to buy additional private assets. That gives us total of 10 billion each month less than in the past, 120 billion less printing every year. “What a great sum of money, what a major shift in policy” – one would be inclined to say, wouldn’t he? Now the Fed is going to print 75 billion dollars, not 85 billion dollars as it used to. But wait a minute…
That’s like saying that a bath tub is getting empty, because the water is coming in at a 10 percent slower pace. Which would obviously be nonsensical. A reduction in future buying of government and agency assets can be considered as some form of reduction, but let us not be misdirected. The Fed is still promising to print and will print 75 billion dollars each month in order to bid the prices of government securities and private assets. That will give us a total of 900 billion dollars for the whole year – those additional green backs being churned out in order to stimulate the economy. This is no tapering at all. This is a very small friendly creature, which should rather be called “taperie”.
The above is a small excerpt from our latest gold Market Overview report. If you’re interested in my detailed analysis, please subscribe and read the full version.
Thank you.
Matt Machaj, PhD
Sunshine Profits‘ Market Overview Editor
Gold Market Overview at SunshineProfits.com

Silver Poised for Breakout
Posted by CEO TECHNICIAN
on Monday, 13 January 2014 13:13
We spend a lot of time focusing on gold, however, its little brother silver is currently in a much more interesting situation from a technical perspective:
Click HERE or on chart to enlarge:
There is substantial promise in the silver chart:
- Strong support clearly exists around and just below the $19 level
- Bullish momentum divergence at December low ($18.72)
- First time price moves above the 50-day simple moving average since October (indicative of a bottoming process with a potential fresh uptrend)
- Little resistance above $20.50 until $21.50-$22 area
- Gold/silver ratio currently near 62 should see some reversion to the mean (around 55) this year
We are seeing some early buying coming into silver futures in Asia – $20.25 is an important short term level with the key breakout level at $20.50 just above:
Click HERE or on chart to enlarge:

Gold Stock Sector Bull Wedge Update
Morris Hubbartt
Jan 10, 2014
“Our main format is now video analysis…”
Here are today’s videos:
Gold Stock Bull Wedge Pullback Video
Gold Slow Stokes & Fib Lines Video
Silver Outperformance Set-Up Video
Metals Sector Ratio Charts Video
Thanks,
Morris
Super Force Signals
A Leading Market Timing Service
We Take Every Trade Ourselves!
Email: trading@superforcesignals.com
Unique Introduction For Web Readers: Send me an email to alerts@superforcesignals.com and I’ll send you 3 of my next Super Force Surge Signals free of charge, as I send them to paid subscribers. Thank you!
The Super Force Proprietary SURGE index SIGNALS:
25 Super Force Buy or 25 Super Force Sell: Solid Power.
50 Super Force Buy or 50 Super Force Sell: Stronger Power.
75 Super Force Buy or 75 Super Force Sell: Maximum Power.
100 Super Force Buy or 100 Super Force
Sell: “Over the Top” Power.
Stay alert for our Super Force alerts, sent by email to subscribers, for both the daily charts on Super Force Signals at www.superforcesignals.com and for the 60 minute charts at www.superforce60.com
About Super Force Signals:
Our Super Force signals are created thru our proprietary blend of the highest quality technical analysis and many years of successful business building. We are two business owners with excellent synergy. We understand risk and reward. Our subscribers are generally successful business owners, people like yourself with speculative funds, looking for serious management of your risk and reward in the market.
Frank Johnson: Executive Editor, Macro Risk Manager.
Morris Hubbartt: Chief Market Analyst, Trading Risk Specialist.
Email:
Mail:
SFS Web Services
1170 Bay Street, Suite #143
Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2B4
Canada

Will Gold and Silver Increase from Here?
Posted by Przemyslaw Radomski - Sunshine Profits
on Friday, 10 January 2014 18:39
In our previous article on gold, we examined the situation in the U.S. dollar and the euro as many times in the past they gave us important clues about future precious metals’ moves. At that time we wrote in the summary:
(…) gold’s lack of will to really (!) react to positive news, like the dollar’s huge intra-day drop, is a bearish piece of information on its own and an indication that gold is likely to move lower in the short run.
On the next trading day, after the essay was posted, gold and silver declined and dropped to their fresh monthly lows. With this downward move gold almost touched the June low. This strong support level encouraged buyers to push the buy button and the yellow metal, which last week saw its best week since October, rebounded to around $1,250. At the same time, silver came back above $20.
Will the recent week’s rally continue? Before we try to answer this question, we’ll examine the long-term charts of gold and silver to see if there’s anything on the horizon that could these precious metals higher or lower in the near future. We’ll start with the long-term chart of gold (charts courtesy by http://stockcharts.com).
For Larger view click HERE or on image:
Even though a lot happened last and this week, from the long-term perspective not much changed on the gold market.
We saw a move back to the rising long-term resistance line (currently close to $1,250), but gold only touched it, only to decline once again. At this time the medium-term outlook remains bearish. Any additional rally is not likely to move significantly above this level (from this perspective significantly means not more than $50 above it, which takes significant intra-day volatility into account).
Our previous essay on gold we wrote the following:
Please note that the exact target for gold is quite difficult to provide. In the cases of silver and mining stocks there are respectively: combinations of strong support levels, and a major support in the form of the 2008 low. In the case of gold, there are 4 support levels that could stop the decline and each of them is coincidentally located $50 below the previous one starting at $1,150: $1,150, $1,100, $1,050, and $1,000.
Taking into account the current situation in the yellow metal, the above price targets remain valid.
Let’s take a look at the chart featuring gold’s price from the non-USD perspective.
From the non-USD perspective, gold simply moved back to the previously broken support line and verified it as resistance. There was only an intra-week move above it, but the price is already back below the line, and it seems that it will close the week below it as well. Please note that in the final part of 2013 we also saw one intra-week move back above this line and this move was even more significant than what we saw this week. It too didn’t invalidate the breakdown. In fact, it was followed by a significant downswing. We can expect the situation to be quite similar shortly, if gold does indeed rally. The move higher could be temporary, and unless we have a weekly close above the rising support line (dashed line, currently close to 46), we will not have any bullish implications whatsoever.
Even if we see some strength, the ratio would have to move above 48 (where the upper declining resistance line is currently located) in order for the situation to become bullish.
Consequently, some short-term strength is clearly possible, but we don’t think that the medium-term downtrend will be invalidated.
Having discussed the current situation in gold, let’s take a look at the long-term chart of silver.
To view larger image click HERE or on chart:
It is often said that history repeats itself (or that it rhymes) and it surely applies when we look at silver’s recent performance.
At the end of December silver moved temporarily back above the rising support/resistance line, but didn’t manage to hold this level. The white metal gave up the gains and dropped below both long-term support/resistance lines, which triggered further deterioration.
This week, the white metal made another attempt to move back above the resistance lines, but failed to move above the upper of them and ultimately the breakdown below these lines was not invalidated.
The next downside target is the previous 2013 low, slightly above the $18 level. Once we see silver below it, the next (and probably final) stop will likely be close to $16. Overall, the trend remains down.
Summing up, looking at the current situation in gold and silver, we see that the medium-term trends remain down and the outlook for both remains bearish. However, on a short-term basis we can expect to see a temporary move higher. In case of gold, it doesn’t seem that the yellow metal will move above $1,250, and even if that happened, it would not be likely to move above $1,285 and change the medium-term trend. In the case of silver, given the white metal’s back-and-forth performance in the recent weeks, we also can’t rule out another move higher before the next big move down materializes.
Thank you for reading.
Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA
Founder, Editor-in-chief
Tools for Effective Gold & Silver Investments – SunshineProfits.com
Tools für Effektives Gold- und Silber-Investment – SunshineProfits.DE
* * * * *
Disclaimer
All essays, research and information found above represent analyses and opinions of Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA and Sunshine Profits’ associates only. As such, it may prove wrong and be a subject to change without notice. Opinions and analyses were based on data available to authors of respective essays at the time of writing. Although the information provided above is based on careful research and sources that are believed to be accurate, Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA and his associates do not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the data or information reported. The opinions published above are neither an offer nor a recommendation to purchase or sell any securities. Mr. Radomski is not a Registered Securities Advisor. By reading Przemyslaw Radomski’s, CFA reports you fully agree that he will not be held responsible or liable for any decisions you make regarding any information provided in these reports. Investing, trading and speculation in any financial markets may involve high risk of loss. Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA, Sunshine Profits’ employees and affiliates as well as members of their families may have a short or long position in any securities, including those mentioned in any of the reports or essays, and may make additional purchases and/or sales of those securities without notice.


-
I know Mike is a very solid investor and respect his opinions very much. So if he says pay attention to this or that - I will.
~ Dale G.
-
I've started managing my own investments so view Michael's site as a one-stop shop from which to get information and perspectives.
~ Dave E.
-
Michael offers easy reading, honest, common sense information that anyone can use in a practical manner.
~ der_al.
-
A sane voice in a scrambled investment world.
~ Ed R.
Inside Edge Pro Contributors

Greg Weldon

Josef Schachter

Tyler Bollhorn

Ryan Irvine

Paul Beattie

Martin Straith

Patrick Ceresna

Mark Leibovit

James Thorne

Victor Adair