Gold & Precious Metals

With President Obama safely back in the White House investors in precious metals can justly feel that the president’s promise that ‘the best is yet to come’ is aimed at them. For gold and silver outperformed every other asset class in his first term, and there is nothing like political continuity.

Investors in precious metals have pretty much doubled their money since Mr. Obama was first elected. In that same timeframe US equities have been on a roller-coaster ride to nowhere. Bonds have done better but nowhere near as good as gold and silver.

Trend is your friend

ArabianMoney bought into this trend a little over four years ago and has stuck with it ever since. The plunge of 2008-9 was a testing period but the recovery was swift and then highly profitable.

We’ve been pointing out the recent chart trends that signal $130 silver is around the corner (click here) and we have noted what gold superbug Jim Sinclair has been saying about post-election buying by the Chinese (click here). It’s already happening.

In September gold exports from Hong Kong to Mainland China rose 23 per cent year-on-year and were up 30 per cent from August. Gold exports from Hong Kong to China rocketed from 204 tonnes to 582 tonnes comparing the 12 months to end of September with the year before.

The Chinese are increasingly worried about holding US dollars. Japan has actually just overtaken China as a the largest holder of US treasuries. The Chinese want to own gold instead and those that think gold expensive buy silver.

They only know what we all know. Every major central bank in the world, including the Bank of China is printing money by buying its own bonds. More money in circulation pursuing a fixed supply of real assets pushes prices up. Real assets range from real estate to industrial commodities and gold and silver that are also considered the only money without a third party between you and your money.

Dubai traders are getting the message. Gold futures at the Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange jumped by 490 per cent to 465,725 contracts in the year to end of October.

Price spikes

If you think gold and silver prices are high at $1,725 or $32 an ounce then be prepared for a shock over the next few years. The price of basic commodities like food and petrol will continue to rise alarmingly but this will be nothing by comparison to the price of gold and silver, as has been the case for the past four years.

There is also a strong possibility of a bubble forming and spike in the price of precious metals, something we just have not seen yet in a decade of price rises. That will happen when bond markets get into trouble as a contagion from what we already see in Greece and Spain, and investors return to the ultimate safe haven asset.

For when everybody decides precious metals are the only place to be that will be the time to cash out, but we are a long way from that day of reckoning. It could be four more years.

 

For years I have cautioned that changes in the ownership of gold held in the vaults of key central banks around the globe may not have been accurately reported. A report issued last month in Germany has once again brought these issues to the fore. In today’s environment of rampant money creation and questioning of central bank activities, such uncertainty is bound to spark the curiosity of an increasing number of investors.

Since the depths of the 2008 financial crisis, central banks around the world have increased their gold holdings. As of January of this year, the International Monetary Fund estimated that official reserves had hit a six year high. Most of this growth has come from emerging and developing nations who are estimated to have swollen their gold reserves 25% by weight since 2008. Just a few years ago, India purchased 200 tonnes on offer by the IMF.

This increase may surprise those who have been led to believe that central banks do not traditionally accumulate gold during recessions. The fact that they are doing so could carry an important message for private investors.

The United States, which has gold holdings of some 8,133.5 tonnes as of 2010 (currently valued at some $420 billion), is still by far the largest holder of gold. Perhaps with deep memories of the social scars of its Weimar Republic, Germany is the world’s second largest, with some 3,396 tonnes. Oddly, Germany keeps its horde largely abroad with an estimated 66 percent at the New York Federal Reserve and 21 percent at the Bank of England. The gold was moved out of Germany during the Cold War in the 1950s due to concerns of a potential Russian invasion of West Germany.

In late October, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard reported in the UK’s Daily Telegraph that the German Court of Auditors told legislators in a redacted report that the German gold held abroad had ‘never been verified physically’ and ordered the Bundesbank to secure access to the storage sites. The report included the surprise revelation that Germany had slashed the amount of gold held at the Bank of England by two thirds back in 2000 and 2001. At that time, active gold selling by the UK government had apparently made the Germans nervous. Further, Evans-Pritchard reported that the Court called for the repatriation of 150 tonnes of German gold over the next three years to test its weight and quality. The report added fuel to the political movement within Germany to bring back all of its gold reserves. From my perspective, the report also sheds light on three fascinating issues.

First, Germany has increased its gold holdings significantly between 2000 and 2009, more than doubling the percentage of its foreign exchange reserves held in gold. According to 2010 figures of the World Gold Council, Germany’s gold reserve now constitutes nearly 74 percent of its foreign exchange reserves. This increase came despite rising storage costs and the massively reduced threat of Russian invasion. What caused Germany to accumulate so much gold? This question should not be lost on investors.

Second, the report details a level of central bank cooperation and trust that staggers the imagination. Allied governments appear to have “trusted” one another with the stewardship of hundreds of billions of dollars worth of unallocated, and in some cases uninventoried, gold bars. This policy borders on financial negligence.

Third, some central banks, such as the Fed, publish the total amount of gold held in their inventories. However, they provide no details as to its ownership. It is well known that some countries keep considerable portions of their bullion reserves with the U.S. Fed and with the Bank of England. But the details are lacking.

From 1999 to 2009 central banks drafted and executed three Central Bank Gold Agreements that have the stated intention of coordinating the sale of gold on a global basis. Many private investors see these agreements as simply an attempt to “demonetize” gold by creating strategic price volatility, and thereby investment uncertainty. The massive trading required to achieve these desired price movements must have resulted in relative changes to central bank holdings. But as banks do not reveal the owners of their gold deposits, the data is unavailable to prove this.

In the coming years, we expect general interest in gold as a store of value to increase while confidence in fiat currencies declines. If this trend is energized by increasing uneasiness over the safety, security, and ownership of the gold held by the world’s central banks, much greater volatility could result. If the general breakdown of trust in fiat money is increased suddenly by a sovereign debt crisis like we have seen in Southern Europe, the next action could be a move by central banks to lay more formal claims to their deposits held abroad. Such an eventuality could finally drag the shadowy central bank gold market into the light of day.  

John Browne is a Senior Economic Consultant to Euro Pacific Capital. Opinions expressed are those of the writer, and may or may not reflect those held by Euro Pacific Capital, or its CEO, Peter Schiff.

Ed Note: read more from Peter Schiff’s Digest HERE or individual articles:

 Lessons from Black Monday 

Yields Are High Down Under 

Housing Crisis Dead Ahead 

Peter Grandich is Cautiously Optimistic About the Juniors in 2013.

Resources Wire editor Kevin Michael Grace interviewed Peter Grandich October 24, 2012. In this second part of that interview, Grandich focuses on the prospects for junior-resource companies.

RW: The last time we spoke, you were quite gloomy about the juniors. Since then we’ve seen a rally. Are you less gloomy than you were?

PG: I don’t know if I was gloomy; it was more being realistic. We had suffered the worst bear market in quite some time in the junior resource market. There is no question that they’ve risen off the bottom, but I thought that those who were forecasting dramatic rises from that point were sadly mistaken.

Financing is still very difficult, and nothing in that area will change until at least early next year. I fully concur that the worst is behind us, but we’re not about to have nirvana any time soon. The juniors really made more of an overall sideways move. I don’t expect that the whole market to move up substantially and hold those gains until gold makes its move above $1,900.

….read more HERE

This following interview focuses on gold and the debt crisis:

Gold And The Debt Crisis

Peter Grandich Sees $2,000 Gold in 2013

RW: Let me start with market suppression. We’ve heard mainstream sources talking about the suppression of gold. And John Williams of Shadow Stats has also had some mainstream attention. Are you encouraged by this?

PG: I think the unemployment number was the biggest surprise. The talk wasn’t from the normal “conspiracy” groups but from Jack Welch, who used to run GE. While it brought attention to the possibility of manipulation, I don’t think it did anything to tone it down or stop it. Those who are doing it will continue to do so until such time as we see a smoking gun.

RW: On your blog, you called Comex “Crimenex.”

PG: Yeah, I’ve used it again, a couple of minutes ago. I’m not the first to use that terminology.

RW: Do you think gold suppression is sustainable? If so, for how long?

PG: I differ a little bit from the more day-to-day people in that I don’t believe it happens as often as they believe it does. But I don’t think there is a big difference between me and the others in that there has certainly been a reason to deter gold from rising as fast as it might have otherwise. If and when the manipulation is done, it’s obviously done in the paper market, which we know as Comex. I feel for those like GATA who say this is happening on a daily basis, as they continue to demonstrate a bigger and better circumstantial case.

Still, most of the mainstream media ignore them. I feel their frustration because when they do see something in the media about it, it’s from the parties on the opposite side who say there is no such thing, you’re stupid, a kook or tinfoil-hat person. Yet the other side has been so wrong on the price movement of gold. It always seems that those of us who have been right for the bulk of the decade are those who always have to respond to any decline in the gold price. But those who have been so wrong about the gold price never seem to have to answer for their mistakes.

RW: The people who hate gold are always talking about a bubble, and the bubble is always bursting or about to burst. Isn’t it a commonplace that in bubbles you have massive over-investment? Isn’t it true that there are still relatively few people invested in gold?

PG: Yeah. I’ve called it the biggest stealth bull market in my nearly 30 years in business. I never could have imagined it when I started working in the financial community. That something can rise in such percentage terms and not only see a lack of support but also no real participation across the board by average investors.

Bubbles are like the NASDAQ stocks in the 1990s and real estate a few years ago when the vast majority of people were in it, and their expectations were for it to only go higher. Nothing can be further from the truth in the gold market, and that’s why the bubble talk is really just BS and a façade they try to create.

The fundamental arguments they’ve made for gold to fall hundreds of dollars haven’t worked out. So they try to say that the only reason we got up here is that there are masses of people buying and hysteria accumulating. I respond that if everybody was buying it, all these people wouldn’t be profiting from their ads telling people sell their gold, send it through the mail, etc. I think that’s more the BS from what I and others have coined the Permabear camp.

….read page 2 & 3 HERE

2 Key Points & What to Expect Now

Putting Gold & Gold Stocks in Proper Context

The precious metals complex had a great rebound at the end of the summer but is now in the midst of a correction. Recently we wrote that the correction was nearing an end. We believe that to be the case. A short-term bottom could occur sometime this week. However, the precious metals sector was unable to retain much of the very strong momentum it previously had. Thus, the metals and stocks will need some time to confirm support and generate positive momentum before they have a chance of breaking to new highs. That being said, we wanted to take a broader view and analyze the sector in its current context in comparsion to the past.

Gold is likely to end up in its longest consolidation, which would surpass the 2006-2007 and 2008-2009 consolidations. Note the chart below and our observations on the three consolidations. Gold’s current position is weaker than the previous two consolidations but that won’t be of concern as long as the metal holds above the 400-day moving average at $1650. Whether Gold holds at $1650 or bottoms at $1600, the metal is likely to remain in this consolidation for a while.

nov4edgold

Checking the gold stocks (HUI), we see that the 400-day moving average provides excellent context. The gold stocks put in a strong double bottom and rallied up to the moving average. The market is now correcting the previous overbought state. In the three previous examples, the market began its rebound off of a major bottom (2000, 2005, 2008) and encountered initial resistance at the 400-day moving average.

nov4edhui

We focus on 2005 and 2008 because those are most applicable to today’s situation. In 2005, the HUI traded around the moving average for almost three months before pushing up to the previous all-time high. A similar thing happened in 2009. The HUI wrestled with the 400-day moving average from May until September before eventually rallying back to all-time high.

To conclude, there is nothing to be worried about in regards to precious metals. First, we should note that the shares have been showing more strength than the metals, which is always a very good sign for the near future. Second, the metals and more specifically the shares have been acting exactly as they did within a similar context in the past. After a rebound from a major low, the shares typically correct and wrestle with the 400-day moving average before embarking on a move to previous highs. Traders and investors are urged to be patient and accumulate at support when sentiment is constructive. Now while the market is wrestling with the 400-day moving average is the time to do your research and find the companies that will lead the next leg higher and outperform the market indices like the HUI, GDX and GDXJ. If you’d be interested in professional guidance in uncovering the producers and explorers poised for big gains then we invite you to learn more about our service.

Good Luck!

Jordan Roy-Byrne, CMT
Jordan@TheDailyGold.com

 

 

 

A Powerful Case This is a Normal Gold Correction

In fact, going back 30 years, the historical seasonality of gold has been to rise during September, with a subsequent correction in October.

I spent the latter half of last week at the New Orleans Investment Conference, talking with investors, mining companies and analysts about the state of the gold industry. The annual conference falls at an interesting time of the year, as the price of gold typically corrects in October.

DRH11-1-12-01

This fall, gold has followed this historical trend, with the metal climbing throughout the month of September to reach a high of $1,790 an ounce on October 4, only to have a normal correction to $1,701 by October 24. This decline typically comes ahead of the Love Trade fueling demand prior to the Hindu festival of lights, Diwali, which begins in November.

Miners, Show Me the Money!

At the conference, I’ve been discussing the multiple forces squeezing the profits and earnings out of gold miners, causing equity investors to become the Rod Tidwells of the gold world, getting miners energized to “Show me the money!” In my opinion, this phenomenon highlights the importance of selectively choosing among those gold companies that exhibit the best relative growth and momentum characteristics to help obtain outstanding investment results.

DRH11-1-12-02-300x300My workshop presentation in “The Big Easy” integrated preeminent thinking from multiple gold experts, including research firm CIBC, Gold Fields and the World Gold Council, about how gold companies’ performance has been neither “big” nor “easy.” There’s been a decline in production per share, an 80 percent increase in the average cost per ton of gold over the past six years, and a 21 percent decline in global average grades of gold since 2005. Cash taxes per ounce of production have increased dramatically, and, according to CIBC World Markets, the replacement cost for an ounce of gold is now $1,500, with $1,700 as a sustainable number. Cash operating costs eat away the most, at $700 an ounce, while sustaining capital, construction capital, discovery costs, overhead and taxes eat up $800. At the October 24 gold price of $1,700 an ounce, only $200 is left over as profit, says CIBC.

Gold companies have had their share of challenges in the past. Prior to the huge run-up in gold prices in the late 1970s, forward price-to-cash flow ratios crashed from a high of about 22 times to just under 9 times. Eventually, as gold climbed to its high, multiples spiked back up to 21 times.

DRH11-1-12-03

Miners also didn’t increase the supply of the precious metal in the 1970s. Back then, there were only a few major players in the gold game. South Africa was a significant gold-producing country, as well as Russia and North America.

However, following years of a gold bull market in the 1970s, production climbed. In fact, Pierre Lassonde, chairman of Franco-Nevada and a living legend in the mining and resource world, says it took seven years for the gold industry to respond after the rise in the price of gold. Ironically, as the price kept falling over the next 20 years, production doubled, says Lassonde.

DRH11-1-12-04

Beginning in 2000, gold companies have experienced a similar phenomenon, with production remaining flat, even declining in some years. In 2008, mine supply of gold fell to levels not seen since the early 1990s.

Now, after a seven-year lag, the industry has responded as we’re beginning to see some growth in supply.

From 2006 through 2011, production throughout the entire gold industry has increased about 3 percent, says CEO Nick Holland of Gold Fields. During his keynote presentation at the Melbourne Mining Club in July, he indicated that most of the growth was not coming from the major producers. In more mature markets, such as South Africa, Australia, Peru and the U.S., annual production decreased by about 5 million ounces since 2006. Emerging markets on the other hand—China, Colombia, Mexico and Russia—added about 7.6 million ounces over the last six years, Holland says.

Of gold finds that contain at least 2 million ounces of gold, research from the Metals Economics Group (MEG) finds that there have been 99 significant discoveries between 1997 and 2011. Only 14 of the 26 major gold producers made these major gold discoveries. “Today, the major producers and their majority-owned subsidiaries hold 39 percent of the reserves and resources in the 99 significant discoveries made in the past 15 years.” This amounts to less than half of the yellow metal needed to replace the gold companies’ production from 2002 to 2011, says MEG.

According to Lassonde, this is the “elephant in the room,” as new finds have become elusive. The chart below from CIBC shows that there was only one major discovery that was more than 3 million ounces in 2011. Over the past seven years, there have been only nine major discoveries of gold.

DRH11-1-12-05

Lassonde doesn’t think we have hit “peak gold,” but believes the gold industry needs a “3D seismic” event similar to what occurred in the oil industry before we see considerable finds.
For as many challenges as gold companies face today, they have rarely experienced such a well-diversified consumer base and diversified demand for their product: It’s “the best we could ask for,” says Lassonde.

A newer trend that I’ve discussed is the reemergence of emerging markets central banks as buyers of gold, as they have been “relearning that all paper currencies are suspect,” says Lassonde. Today, he says “cash is trash,” with the value of euro, dollar and yen in question.

He believes this source of demand could be long-lasting and quite significant if you look at emerging market countries’ gold holdings as a percent of total reserves. In 2000, the European Central Bank decided that the right proportion of gold to own should be 15 percent. Pierre says if you apply that figure to the potential gold holdings of the emerging market central banks, they would need to accumulate 17,000 tons of gold. At a purchase of 1,000 tons a year (or about 40 percent of today’s production), these central banks would have to buy gold for the next 17 years!

DRH11-1-12-06

Another growing source of demand has been from the Fear Trade’s scooping up of gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Eight years after the products were launched, 12 gold ETFs and eight other similar investments are valued at around $120 billion and hold 2,500 tons of gold, says Nick Holland.

I believe the Fear Trade will continue buying not only gold but also gold stocks, as the group is driven by Helicopter Ben’s quantitative easing program.

In the latest Weldon’s Money Monitor, Greg Weldon discusses the consequences of the Federal Reserve’s debt monetization and liquidity provisions, showing the “somewhat frightening pace” of expansion in money supply.

Weldon says that over the last four years since August 2008, the U.S. Narrow Money Supply, or M1, which is physical money such as coins, currency and deposits, has increased 73 percent, or more than one trillion dollars. This is about as much as it expanded in the previous forty years!

DRH11-1-12-07

Don’t let the short-term correction fool you into selling your gold and gold stocks.

The dramatic increase in money suggests that monetary debasement will continue, and in addition to all the above drivers, I believe these are the positive dynamics driving higher prices for gold and gold stocks.

Frank Holmes

Original article posted on Daily Resource Hunter