Currency

Russia-based hacking group REvil attacked over 200 US networks and demanded $70 million in Bitcoin as ransom. The leading cryptocurrency is increasingly used in Ransomware attacks, and this is causing problems for the authorities.

Russian-based ransomware group brought down the networks of at least 200 United States companies over the weekend. The hacking group is now demanding $70 million in ransom and wants it to be paid in Bitcoin.

According to ABC News, the hacking group targeted software supplier Kaseya and proceeded to use its network-managed package to spread ransomware through its cloud. This resulted in over a million machines getting infected by the ransomware.

Following the attack, the Russian-based group is now demanding to be paid in Bitcoin in exchange for a decrypter for the infected machines. The group wrote, “On Friday, we launched an attack on [managed service providers]. More than a million systems were infected.”

United States President Joe Biden has already ordered investigations into the incidence. In a Reuters report, Biden said they were not certain of the origins of the hack. “The initial thinking was it was not the Russian government, but we’re not sure yet,” the president said…read more.

Shrinkflation is an economic monster worth watching

Our friends over at Integrated Wealth Management thought you might enjoy this article. ~Ed. 

Ever wonder why you’re going through toilet paper faster (even if your diet hasn’t changed). For those of you alive in the 70’s – did you wonder why all of a sudden gumballs had a hole in the middle? It’s called “shrinkflation” – manufacturers offering less while charging the same price. It’s a “clever” way inflation is killing your purchasing power and probably not reflected in Consumer Price Indices (which we all know are manipulated). Inflation is perhaps the biggest threat to your financial health in the coming years. Make sure to inflation proof your portfolio. This a great article on this phenomenon. ~Sandor Kiss IWM

How will we know if inflation is making a comeback? Most economists are focused on the price of commodities, wages, and other basic goods and services. But history suggests they might want to keep an eye on a related phenomenon that often escapes notice: so-called “shrinkflation.”

This practice became increasingly common in the 1960s and 1970s, when manufacturers confronting runaway inflation tweaked packaging rather than hike prices. At first, the practice attracted relatively little notice: It’s difficult to discern changes in unit prices when they’re camouflaged in different-looking boxes and bags.

In fact, it was the humorist Art Buchwald who was among the first to sound the alarm. In a column entitled “Packaged Inflation” published in 1969, he lampooned the growing tendency to conceal price increases. Tongue in cheek, he praised American industry for “devising new methods to make the product smaller while making the package larger.”

This wasn’t far from the truth. As inflationary pressures rose over the course of the 1970s, manufacturers pursued a number of methods to pass along price increases. The most basic of these was so-called “downsizing” – same package, same price, fewer goods.

In late summer of 1974, for example, Woolworth’s offered a packet of pencils at its back-to-school sale for 99 cents – same price as the previous year. But as a sharp-eyed reporter at The New York Times observed, the packages only contained 24 pencils, six fewer than the previous year. The same strategy affected packets of construction paper (24 sheets, not 30).

The grocery store offered numerous opportunities for downsizers. At the beginning of the decade, that staple of postwar cuisine, Rice-A-Roni, sold boxes containing 8 ounces of the product. Soon, though, it shrank to 6.9 ounces, but the packaging and price remained the same. (Today, the rice-and-vermicelli-filled boxes remain precisely the same weight, which suggests that even shrinkflation has limits.)

This kind of sleight-of-hand became ubiquitous. Everything from cans of tuna fish to jars of spaghetti sauce contained less and less. Advocacy groups like the Consumers’ Union (now Consumer Reports) inveighed against downsizing, but the practice remained widespread…read more.

Is This The Next Big Thing In Lithium Battery Tech?

With the rush of newly minted investors into the EV space, news about electric vehicle technology now rivals that of climate change. Most of the news is good and the latest in batteries is no exception: researchers have managed to make a lithium metal battery last for 600 cycles.

Here’s some clarification upfront: lithium-ion batteries are made up of a lithium-containing cathode and an anode, usually made from graphite. They also feature an electrolyte solution through which lithium ions shuffle back and forth as the battery charges and discharges.

Lithium metal batteries, on the other hand, have an anode that is made from lithium rather than graphite. Lithium is much lighter than graphite and reduces the total weight of the battery. This lighter weight also helps the battery store a lot more energy.

What’s more, lithium metal batteries are a newer technology, which means there’s more space for innovation, while lithium-ion technology is “rapidly approaching their theoretical limit on energy density,” as one scientist from the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory put it last year.

Unfortunately, as is the case with any technology, not all the news is good. The replacement of graphite with lithium in the anode makes the usual electrolytes used in lithium-ion batteries unusable so new electrolytes need to be developed. This has proved challenging, so for all its advantages, lithium-ion technology has yet to get out of the lab and before it does that, it needs to prove it can make batteries with lithium anodes last at least as long as the lithium-ion ones.

The problem with lithium metal batteries is their short life, so this is what scientists have been focusing on lately. Last year, a SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory team reported it had succeeded in making a lithium metal battery last for 420 cycles of charging and discharging. That’s up from an average of 30 cycles for previous lithium metal batteries, so it’s quite an advancement. To compare, the average lithium-ion battery for EVs lasts for a few thousand cycles.

Now, another team of scientists, from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, has announced a battery that can last for up to 600 cycles, and even once this number was reached, it still retained close to 80 percent of its capacity…read more.

Gap’s upcoming Yeezy line with rapper Kanye West could bring in nearly $1 billion in incremental sales next year, according to an analysis by Wells Fargo.

“Now that this catalyst is here, the majority of questions we are fielding regarding Gap is around how powerful this partnership with Yeezy could be — which is why we thought it would be helpful to put numbers behind the initiative,” Wells Fargo analyst Ike Boruchow wrote in a note to clients on Wednesday.

Earlier this month, Gap released its first product from the highly anticipated line, giving shoppers a taste of what’s to come. The $200 bright blue nylon puffer jacket was on sale for a limited time. Now, the coats are being floated on resale sites for more than $1,000, and the items haven’t even shipped yet. It’s unclear exactly when more Yeezy/Gap merchandise will drop, but a fuller line-up is expected to come later this year.

To quantify what the partnership could mean for Gap, Wells Fargo surveyed 530 Gap shoppers and 470 non-Gap customers to determine their interest in the Yeezy line. It completed the survey in a partnership with the data firm Guidepoint. Participants needed to know who Kanye West is, Wells Fargo said.

Among the Gap customers, 64% indicated they planned to buy items from the collaboration. On average, they expected to spend an incremental $178 on Yeezy products in the first year of the line’s debut. Of the people who currently don’t shop at Gap, 23% said they intended to buy the merchandise and expected to shell out an incremental $126 at Gap.

Within the group of people who don’t shop at Gap but plan to buy Yeezy products, 75% said they expect they’ll purchase other Gap products while shopping. This suggests that the tie-up has the power to drive new customers to Gap, Boruchow said.

Wells Fargo estimated that the Yeezy line could drive up to $990 million in sales for Gap in fiscal 2022, and boost earnings by roughly 50 cents per share. By fiscal 2026, the partnership could add about $1.50 per share to earnings, Wells Fargo said…read more.

Robinhood saddled with historic $70 million fine from financial regulators

FINRA suggests Robinhood failed to protect its customers.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced on Wednesday that it’s fining Robinhood almost $70 million to settle charges over issues it identified with the company’s stock trading service. The authority claims that the financial app company neglected its duty to supervise trades, maintain its own technology, and protect its customers. The fine is the largest in FINRA’s history and Robinhood has agreed to pay.

FINRA says since 2016 Robinhood has periodically provided false and misleading information on topics like whether customers were able to place trades on margin (using credit from Robinhood to buy shares), including displaying inaccurate information in its app on how much cash was in customers’ accounts.

The authority’s announcement doesn’t specifically identify the case, but it does appear to obliquely reference the death of Alex Kearns, who died by suicide after finding a negative $730,000 balance in his Robinhood account from unintentional margin trades. Robinhood was sued following Kearns’ death and ultimately settled for an undisclosed amount.

FINRA also takes issue with Robinhood’s reliance on algorithms to approve customers for options trading and the outages the platform has suffered, locking customers out of their accounts “during a time of historic market volatility.”

For those errors and failing to report customer complaints to FINRA, the financial authority is requiring Robinhood to pay a $57 million fine and $12.6 million in restitution to affected customers. Robinhood hasn’t owned up to FINRA’s complaints or denied them, but it did say in a statement that: “We are glad to put this matter behind us and look forward to continuing to focus on our customers and democratizing finance for all.”…read more