Energy & Commodities
As government-imposed lockdown measures confined hundreds of millions of Americans to their homes, many began to entertain DIY projects they previously hadn’t the time or resources to complete. Over 75 percent of homeowners surveyed by Porch.com in July 2020 had completed a home improvement project since the beginning of the pandemic. Would-be craftsmen who have waited until now to begin renovations may be out of luck, however––over the past year, the price of lumber has skyrocketed, and home project expenses have risen with them.
From a price of $259.80 per thousand board-feet (the standard unit of lumber trading) on 1 April 2020, on Friday 7 May 2021, the price of lumber had risen to $1,686 per thousand board-feet as the DIY boom coincided with dire challenges to the lumber industry, including increased home building, mill closures, and staffing shortages.
Construction crews began to build homes with scarce materials, exacerbating shortages. Even a year on, mill capacity is limited, and production simply cannot meet the booming demand.
Lumber’s meteoric price rise has been unprecedented. In the futures markets, where producers and users of commodities trade to hedge against unanticipated changes of price over longer periods of time, lumber markets have typically been among the most quiescent, especially compared to crude oil, gold, natural gas, and soybeans. In fact, lumber contracts have typically been neck-and-neck with frozen concentrated orange juice (FCOJ) contracts at the bottom of daily trading volumes ranked among all such derivatives. Indeed, with only a handful of exceptions between the mid-1980s and late 2019, the price of lumber per thousand-board feet has traded somewhat listlessly between $200 and $500. Yet front-month lumber has risen 450 percent between the end of 2019 and the end of April 2021, with the period between March 26 and April 19, 2021 showing an unbroken run of 16 daily price increases and a number of limit-up triggers along the way.
Without suggesting that the rise in prices has been purely speculative, perhaps the modern embodiment of Joseph P. Kennedy Sr.’s barometer of frenzy––stock tips from shoeshine boys––is found in the burst of TikTok videos taking notice of prevailing market conditions. (Many employ the hashtags #lumberprices and #woodprices.)… CLICK for the complete article

But it had nothing to do with his on-field performance. The 7x Super Bowl champ was reportedly negotiating his salary to be paid in bitcoin.
Tom Brady, the seven time Super Bowl champion, adds “laser eyes” to his twitter profile picture, a trendy indication of one’s support for Bitcoin. He did so after it was rumored he had been investing in Bitcoin.
Earlier this year Tom Brady announced he will be launching an NFT platform, Autograph, which will allow celebrities to create and list digital collectibles. NFTs, or non-fungible tokens, are digital representations of content maintained on a blockchain or decentralized ledger. Brady’s foray into NFTs would suggested a coinciding interest in cryptocurrencies, like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH), which are the native assets used for settlement on a blockchain.
READ MORE

The group that hacked into the 5.5k mile Colonial Pipeline issued an apology saying that its goal is to “make money and not [create] problems for society.” Parts of the pipeline are slowly coming back online.
Colonial Pipeline hackers apologize, promise to ransom less controversial targets in future
‘We are apolitical, we do not participate in geopolitics’

An oncoming mineral shortage may derail our green future.
Humans can’t catch a break, even in the future.
A recently released report from the International Energy Agency (IEA), highlighted the at-odds relationship between the surging demand for rare minerals and their tight supply.
Experts believe this mismatch could derail countries’ efforts to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, the most recent UN goal.
The reason…
Green energy production is a mineral junkie
Popular green energy solutions use a variety of rare earth metals and minerals. Two examples:
- An electric vehicle (EV) uses 6x as many mineral resources as a fossil fuel car.
- An offshore wind plant requires 9x as many mineral resources as a comparable gas power plant.
According to the IEA’s analysis, manufacturers will need 6x the amount of minerals being produced today by 2040.
Predicted demand for “White Gold” lithium used in EV batteries is otherworldly, expected to 70x in the next few decades. Accounting for existing global lithium mines, we’d only be able to meet about half the demand expected in this decade.
And there’s the supply chain…
… it’s delicate, like one-country-produces-most-of-it delicate.
In 2019, 70% of world’s cobalt production comes from the Demorcatic Republic of Congo. And not to be out-dug, China produces nearly 60% of all rare earth metals — AKA fancy elements ending in “-ium.”
But there’s hope. The IEA report outlined 6 areas of action to avoid the oncoming shortage, which included developing green technologies that aren’t so mineral-dependent.
So if we all work together, we can avoid Armageddon… sounds promising.

What Will You Do When Inflation Forces U.S. Households To Spend 40 Percent Of Their Incomes On Food?
Did you know that the price of corn has risen 142 percent in the last 12 months? Of course corn is used in hundreds of different products we buy at the grocery store, and so everyone is going to feel the pain of this price increase. But it isn’t just the price of corn that is going crazy. We are seeing food prices shoot up dramatically all across the industry, and experts are warning that this is just the very beginning. So if you think that food prices are bad now, just wait, because they are going to get a whole lot worse.
Typically, Americans spend approximately 10 percent of their disposable personal incomes on food. The following comes directly from the USDA website…
In 2019, Americans spent an average of 9.5 percent of their disposable personal incomes on food—divided between food at home (4.9 percent) and food away from home (4.6 percent). Between 1960 and 1998, the average share of disposable personal income spent on total food by Americans, on average, fell from 17.0 to 10.1 percent, driven by a declining share of income spent on food at home.
Needless to say, the poorest Americans spend more of their incomes on food than the richest Americans.
According to the USDA, the poorest households spent an average of 36 percent of their disposable personal incomes on food in 2019…
As their incomes rise, households spend more money on food, but it represents a smaller overall budget share. In 2019, households in the lowest income quintile spent an average of $4,400 on food (representing 36.0 percent of income), while households in the highest income quintile spent an average of $13,987 on food (representing 8.0 percent of income).
Needless to say, the final numbers for 2020 will be quite a bit higher, and many
believe that eventually the percentage of disposable personal income that the average U.S. household spends on food will reach 40 percent.
That would mean that many poor households would end up spending well over 50 percent of their personal disposable incomes just on food.
At one time that would have been unimaginable, but now everything is changing. As I noted above, the price of corn his increased 142 percent since this time last year…
Corn prices have jumped roughly 142% over the past year to $7.56 per bushel, the highest price seen in eight years for the crop.
A drought in Brazil and increased demand in China have put pressure on global suppliers.
In other areas we are seeing more moderate inflation, but overall we just witnessed the largest increase in food inflation “in almost nine years”…
