Asset protection
Politicians never seem to have much trouble telling us they want to raise taxes. It seems to come as naturally to them as breathing does to the rest of us. They do their level best to keep the spotlight on “the rich,” of course, who they say must “pay their fair share.” But what do politicians hardly ever say? They hardly ever say who “the rich” are. And when they do, they usually point to multibillionaires while meaning people with considerably less. What do they also never say? They never say what a “fair share” is. It really just means “more.” Who would’ve thought.
This leaves a problem for the class warfare class, because it is these same rich people who fund their political campaigns. And as if that weren’t bad enough, most Congressmen and Senators are rich themselves. The two who yell the loudest about taxing the rich, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, are worth $2.5 million and $12 million respectively. What are the odds that these two, and all their cronies in Congress, would bite the hands that feed them? What are the odds they would bite their own hands?
We do well to remember 1988. George H. W. Bush, in accepting the Republican nomination for the presidency made his point perfectly clear. People would pressure him to raise taxes, but when that happened he would say, he claimed, “Read my lips. No new taxes.” All things considered, that’s a pretty easy promise to make, but a much harder promise to keep. It wasn’t long before Bush broke his promise, but in doing so he only went after “the rich,” signing into law a 10 percent luxury tax on things rich people buy – yachts, private planes, and expensive jewelry.
The tax was supposed to raise more than $30 million in additional revenue, but it didn’t raise much of anything. The rich simply went elsewhere to purchase their luxuries. Entrepreneurs and the working class paid, and they paid dearly as the tax destroyed almost 10,000 jobs in the boating, aircraft, and jewelry industries. Meanwhile, foreign companies in these industries made out like bandits. And that’s the difference between the rhetoric and the reality of taxation.
We can dig deeper still into tax reality through the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which asks Americans how much they earn and how much they pay in federal taxes. Breaking down those answers by income level provides some valuable insight into who is and isn’t paying their “fair share.”

FAAMG (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Google) had absolutely monster Q1s. Here’s a breakdown.
Last week, we saw the latest quarterly results for the (unfortunately named) FAAMG Big Tech companies.
For the uninitiated, that acronym is collectively worth $8T+:
- FB, Facebook ($923.6B)
- AAPL, Apple ($2.2T)
- AMZN, Amazon ($1.7T)
- MSFT, Microsoft ($1.9T)
- GOOGL, Alphabet ($1.6T)
The pandemic boosted Big Tech sales
The phrase “record growth” was a constant theme for Q1 2021 revenue: Apple sales were +54% YoY to $90B while Amazon jumped 44% YoY to $108.5B.
While growth was slower for the other behemoths, their Q1 sales numbers are still huge: Alphabet ($55B), Microsoft ($42B), Facebook, ($26B).
For perspective, here’s how much these companies made per minute in the first 3 months of the year:
- Amazon: $837k
- Apple: $691k
- Alphabet: $427k
- Microsoft: $322k
- Facebook: $202k
And it’s not just sales
As reported by The Wall Street Journal, here are some other notable Q1 stats:
- iPhone sales alone hit $47B, with the average retail price hitting $847
- Microsoft Teams has 145m daily users, more than 7x the figure from 1.5 years ago
- Amazon’s US employee count hit 950k, ~2x the same period last year
- YouTube revenue was +49% YoY (and its projected $29-$30B run rate for 2021 puts it on par with Netflix)
- Facebook apps (i.e., FB, Instagram, Messenger, WhatsApp) were used by 3.4B+ people at least once in the past month
Perhaps the most jarring number?
FAAMG now makes up ~25% of the total value of the S&P 500 — 2x the share from 5 years ago. Unfortunately for us, it looks like that ghastly acronym isn’t going anywhere.

The S+P 500 stock index hit All-Time Highs in February 2020 but tumbled ~35% within the next five weeks as the virus contagion shattered investor confidence. Central banks and governments launched unprecedented monetary and fiscal stimulus to counteract the effects of the virus, and the S+P roared back from the March lows to make new All-Time highs by August.
For the next ten weeks, the index drifted sideways, correcting ~10%, and then in early November, Biden was elected, Pfizer announced a vaccine, and the market rally resumed with a vengeance. At the end of April 2021, the S+P and the DJIA are up ~90% from last year’s panic lows, the Nasdaq is up ~112%, and the small-cap Russell is up ~140%.

The digital revolution has transformed the advertising industry beyond recognition, and advertising is the driving engine of the boom in e-commerce. Right after this week’s show at 10:05am pacific time, Adcore CEO Omri Brill and GM Martijn van den Bemd present the latest innovations and highlights, and discuss the future of e-commerce. And most importantly, show how investors can benefit in the short and long term. CLICK HERE to register and watch.

The emergence of China as an economic and financial powerhouse has been much quicker than often anticipated. Whether in terms of technological advances, industrial development, global trade or involvement in the capital markets, China’s rise has been rapid and highly disruptive.
There is, however, one glaring omission from this panoramic picture of strength: the internationalization of its currency, which has been far slower than earlier anticipated.
China’s expected rewriting of the world’s financial system after the 2008 global financial crisis seemingly peaked in 2015 with the International Monetary Fund’s conclusion that the yuan was comparable to the dollar, euro, yen and pound. But since then, although various measures have been implemented, such as improving foreign access to its onshore equity and debt markets, there has been a little evidence of a concerted effort to push for its broader global adoption.
This loss of momentum is very visible. According to the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications (SWIFT), the global payment processing system, just 2.2% of total international payments and an even lower 1.3% of trade financing are denominated in yuan. Not only does this compare unfavorably with China’s 12.4% share of 2020 global merchandise trade, but these proportions have not changed over the last five years. Nor has the yuan been widely adopted as a reserve currency: It accounted for just 2.1% of global allocated reserves at the end of 2020, far less than the dollar’s 55.2%.
There is, however, mounting evidence that China is gearing up for a second push to encourage greater global yuan adoption. Much attention is focused on the international potential of the planned digital yuan, or e-CNY, especially as the platform will allow its overseas usage outside the existing U.S.-dominated financial architectures. But China has also announced or proposed other substantive initiatives… CLICK for the complete article
