Current Affairs

Fauci Knew About Likely Lab-Leak From Secret Teleconference, Pushed Alternate Narrative Instead

Dr. Anthony Fauci was told in a secret teleconference that the coronavirus had very likely leaked from a laboratory in China, yet still pushed the alternate narrative that it had originated naturally, new evidence allegedly shows.

Redacted emails that were recently made public suggest that Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), initiated efforts to cover up evidence pointing to a laboratory leak as the origin of Covid-19.

Evidence suggests that Fauci also actively shaped a highly influential academic paper first published on Feb. 16, 2020, before later being printed in the prominent science journal Nature which excluded such a possibility.

The article, titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” was co-authored by five virologists, four of whom joined Fauci in a Feb. 1, 2020, teleconference.

During the phone call, at least three authors of the paper said they were 60 to 80 percent sure that the virus had originated from a laboratory, something that they also reiterated in emails following the call.

At the time, public reports also emerged of a potential link between the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China and the virus outbreak, yet these reports were dismissed by Fauci and other medical professionals as conspiracy theories…read more.

Trading Desk Notes for January 29, 2022

Reassessing The Fed = Market Mayhem

On January 15, the lede for my TD Notes was: “Peak Fed Hawkish – Or Minsky Moment?” Since then, particularly since Wednesday’s Fed meeting, price action would tell you that we’ve had a “Minsky Moment” – that the Fed is a LONG way from Peak Hawkish.

I’m taking the other side of that trade – buying the S+P, which tumbled on Fed tightening fears.

On January 15, I wrote: Peak Fed hawkish means the markets have WAY over-anticipated the consequences of Fed tightening (the Fed will stand down) – Minsky moment means there has been a sea-change at the Fed, and you ain’t seen nothing yet! Both opinions have eloquent spokesmen; recent short-term price action has been choppy as markets decide which view will prevail.

It depends on your time frame

I can get on board the “Minsky” train in a long-term time frame (more than a year). After all, current interest rate levels are about as low as they’ve ever been in human history, (risk) assets prices have soared the past two decades and have been absolutely smoking hot since the Covid panic in March 2020. We’re “due” for a “Minsky” inflection point.

But – on a short-term time frame (the next month or two), I’m betting that markets have WAY over-anticipated the consequences of severe tightening from the Fed.

Equity markets

Last week, the Dow plunged nearly 2,000 points and closed right on its lows – setting up a nasty 1,400 point free-fall from Sunday’s overnight highs to early Monday’s 7-month lows. From the January 5th All-Time High the Dow fell ~3,800 points (10.5%) in only 13 trading days.

Mid-day Monday, the Dow pivoted and rallied ~1,400 points to close GREEN on the day!

Wicked hour-to-hour rollercoaster price action continued throughout the week – every day this week, Dow futures had a high/low price range of > 1,000 points! (I remember in the 1970s when the Dow was 1,000!)

I will tell you that trading equity markets this week was hard to do when the high/low range on a 30-minute bar was WAY more than it used to be for an entire BIG day!

Liquidity and depth-of-market were thin, but volume was huge. Option vols were the highest we’ve seen in a year, and (you just knew) some option dealers were getting killed buying highs and selling lows as they tried to manage gamma risk.

It was a violent, nasty week but all of the major indices (save the Trannies and the Russell small-cap) closed green on the week. Vols closed down on the week.

Interest rates

Yields across the whole Treasury curve jumped during Powell’s press conference – the takeaway was that the Fed would be more aggressive in its fight against inflation than previously thought. By the end of the week, the yield curve was flatter: short rates had jumped to their highest levels in two years while bond yields were steady/lower (if the Fed was going to be tough on inflation by cranking up short rates – that would be good for bonds.)

Higher American interest rates = Higher US Dollar

The US Dollar index closed the week at an 18-month high – rising against nearly all currencies.

The Euro dropped to an 18-month low. It had popped out of a 6-week trading range in mid-January (a false breakout), and that added fuel to the recent decline as new buyers covered their trades.

The Euro is also a “victim” of the widening policy differences between the Fed and the ECB.

European geopolitical worries (Ukraine) also weakened the Euro against the USD and the Swiss Franc. The Euro fell to a 7-year low (essentially, an All-Time low) against Suisse this week.

The Canadian Dollar dropped ~2 cents from its January highs as the USD soared and stocks markets fell – despite solid gains in WTI and the commodity indices.

Gold hit a 2-month high at $1854 on Tuesday but fell ~$75 to Friday’s low. Higher interest rates and a higher USD are kryptonite for gold.

WTI crude oil hit a new 7-year high ~$89

WTI continued its relentless march higher, and backwardation across the forward curve continued to steepen – one year forward WTI is now ~ $11.50 cheaper than the front month.

My short term trading

My P+L was down ~0.75% last week as I tried, unsuccessfully, to pick a bottom in the steep stock market decline. I kept doing that this week and my P+L was down another ~0.5% by Friday morning.

I bought the S+P Friday afternoon, and my unrealized gain on that trade is ~0.5%. The strong Friday close encouraged me to stay long into the weekend.

It was not a fun week for me. I was nicely ahead on a couple of trades, but a swift, violent swing lower knocked me out. I was trading small size, given the magnitude of the intra-day swings, and I only made ~6 trades all week, but I felt like I was playing ice hockey in my boots while all the other guys were wearing skates!

On my radar

My friend, Kevin Muir, had a terrific line in his blog this week: “Opportunities arise out of Wall Street’s shift in sentiment.” I sent him a note complimenting him on that insight – telling him that was the basis of most of my trading – and asking permission to quote him.

I’ve written previously about “variant perception,” a sophisticated term for looking at markets with a contrarian’s eye. (I’ve quoted Michael Steinhardt as saying, “There is no easier way to make money in the market than to have (and to have the confidence to implement) the correct Variant Perception.”)

My current contrarian idea is that the market’s extremely bearish sentiment is WAY overdone (in the short term). I will be watching for support for my idea – and evidence that I am wrong.

I think the “fear” is that the Fed is WAY behind the curve and will have to be more aggressive – which sets up the possibility of “tightening into a recession” and/or a “deleveraging or volatility event” in the markets. That may be what happens, but the recent correction in the major indices masks a washout in the more speculative side of the market (since November) and this week’s price action looks like an inflection point to me.

Another “fear” is that the Fed can’t fight Main Street inflation without causing deflation on Wall Street. I understand. I’ve previously written that the Democrats, sensing a disaster in the upcoming midterms, may be willing to throw Wall Street under the bus if that’s what it takes to kill the inflation that is worrying voters.

Next week, I’ll be watching for signs that “fear” caused some mispricing opportunities in the currency, equity and interest rate markets.

Thoughts on trading

I’ve described my contrarian idea, but that doesn’t mean that I will start selling US Dollars and buying stocks and Eurodollar futures on Monday morning. I’ve got an idea, but I will be looking for price action setups that “go along” with my idea. For instance, if the S+P trades above 4450 and 4500 on this chart, that might be a “sign” that an important bottom was made this week, and I could buy more.

Quotes from the notebook

“What I’m really looking for is a consensus that the market is not confirming.” Bruce Kovner The Market Wizards, 1989

My comment: This is another way of saying “Variant Perception.” For instance, I think Bruce was saying (in effect) that if everybody is bearish, but the price action looks bullish – he’s buying.

“Focus on the process, not the outcome.” Bob Rotella, The Unstoppable Golfer

My comment: A good friend gave me this book years ago, and I’ve reread it a couple of times. Bob coached some of the best golfers in the world – not by telling them how to swing a club, but rather by helping them manage the mental aspect of the game. Traders will benefit more from managing their trading process (and mental attitudes) than looking for trade recommendations.

“Successful trading is about eliminating distractions and focusing on discipline. You have to want to get better – you have to look in the mirror.”

Peter Borish RTV 2018

My comment: Peter worked with Paul Tudor Jones years ago and became a trading coach. I agree 100% with what he says here. It’s not about being the best trader (or golfer or whatever); it’s about being the best you can be – and wanting to get better – and having the discipline to keep going when you want to quit.

The Barney report

The Barns,” as we sometimes call him, keeps growing, and he’s getting smarter all the time. We take him for walks on off-leash trails, and he’s terrific about staying with us. When we throw one of his toys, he fetches it, brings it back and (reluctantly) “leaves it!” A breakthrough!

Please Do Me A Favour

If you like reading the Trading Desk Notes, please forward a copy or a link to a friend. Also, I genuinely welcome your comments, and please let me know if you would like to see something new in the TD Notes.

Victor Adair retired from the Canadian brokerage business in 2020 after 44 years and is no longer licensed to provide investment advice. Nothing on this website is investment advice for anyone about anything.

Wait, are NFTs the new Beanie Babies?

In early 2021 Amber Vittoria, a New York-based graphic designer and digital artist, first heard about nonfungible tokens (NFTs), or digital art tokenized on blockchain networks. She was smitten and by February she and her husband spent $33,331, the money they’d been saving up to buy a car, on CryptoPunk #589, a pixelated woman punk with a mohawk, bright red lips, and a pair of aviator sunglasses. CryptoPunks are a collection of 10,000 pixel portraits that were algorithmically generated to have random attributes like a mohawk or smoking a pipe. The NFT is now her Twitter profile picture.

“You know what, like YOLO I guess,” Vittoria told Morning Brew. “We could only get one obviously.”

Her CryptoPunk is nothing like her own artwork, which explores femininity, physical identity, and emotion. As a professional artist, Vittoria has collaborated with brands including Gucci and Louis Vuitton and she’s been recognized by the Forbes 30 Under 30 list. So she seemed like the perfect person to ask: Is a CryptoPunk art? She hesitated before responding.

“I think they’re more like collectibles in the sense of like, folks who collect baseball cards, or folks who collect like model car sculptures,” she said…read more.

Corruption in Canada worst in a decade, finds international watchdog

Canada has, once again, slipped down an international ranking for corruption, standing at 13th in the world and well back of world leaders, such as Denmark, New Zealand and Singapore.

Since 2015, the year Liberal leader Justin Trudeau became Prime Minister, Canada has fallen nine points, to a score of 74 out of 100 on the Transparency International’s 2021 Corruption Perceptions Index. No country has seen a bigger drop in ratings since 2017 than Canada.

While the latest ranking is Canada’s worst in a decade, the country remained at the top of the rankings in the Americas, where progress on stamping out corruption has “ground to a halt” and democracies like Chile and the United States rank even lower.

Transparency International, a non-profit non-government organization dedicated to sunshine laws, specifically cited ethical breaches by former Finance Minister Bill Morneau for awarding the administration of a $900 million grants program to WE Charity, which has a history of paying politicians and family members, including the Trudeaus, for speaking events.

Also cited is the SNC-Lavalin “foreign bribery case that spiralled into a political crisis” when Trudeau breached conflict of interest rules by improperly pressuring then-Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould to defer prosecution of the construction company.

Transparency International notes how “top-scoring countries,” such as Canada, “have proven too weak to meet the challenge of increasingly globalised, networked corruption – which is not measured by the Index…read more.

More than half of Canadians rate economy as “bad” or “very bad”

We often hear people say that polls are “a snapshot in time.”

While the comment is offered by political organizers who are dissatisfied with the popularity of their policy or candidate, the dictum is accurate – the moment in which people are asked a question can play a pivotal role in the way they feel about an issue.

I was asked to conduct a poll on September 19 and September 20, 2008, to look at the way Canadians felt about economic matters. The moment was significant for various reasons. In the previous week, the scope of the global financial crisis had become clear to anyone who was paying attention: the Dow Jones industrial average had fallen by more than 500 points, Lehman Brothers went bankrupt and the chair of the U.S. Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke, stated that the United States “may not have an economy on Monday” unless drastic action was taken to deal with “toxic mortgages.”

At the time, Canadians would be forgiven for reacting with unbridled panic at the situation that was unfolding in the United States. Still, the data I collected over those two days in September 2008 exuded calmness: 61% of Canadians rated the economic conditions in the country as “very good” or “good,” 60% felt the same way about their personal finances and 60% expected the national economy to improve.

Thirteen years ago, the numbers outlined a Canadian public that was confident in withstanding any challenge. This past weekend, Research Co. and Glacier Media asked Canadians about the current state of affairs. The crisis this time is not caused by “toxic mortgages” but by COVID-19 infections and growing inflation.

In early 2022, the mood of the country is decidedly more sombre than it was at the height of the global financial crisis of 2008. Only 41% of Canadians rate the economic conditions in Canada as “very good” or “good,” while a more than half (54%) consider them “bad” or “very bad.”…read more.