Stocks & Equities
Did we tell you or did we tell you? It’s a bit premature to claim bragging rights but the Junior market has been trading exactly how we hoped it would. Ben Bernanke delivered the early Christmas presents gold bugs were dreaming of and the market tenor looks better than it has for a year.
(Ed Note: Very sorry – this was published on Oct 3rd & 95% of the article and no charts appeared!)
The operative word is still “better”, not “great”. The increase in volume in the Juniors is gratifying but still not enough. It will take higher volumes still to keep a rally alive through to year end.
In keeping with that note of cautious optimism we are sticking with discovery stories that are already working and later stage stories that were under loved until the gold price took off. A number of these are trading impressively well. So far discoveries and undervalued developers/small producers represent most all of the positive volume. They are riding the wave but the tide has not come in for the rest of the companies in the sector.
We still think the market may strengthen further in October but until that happens we decided to add a company to the list with built in protection in the form of a healthy back account. This company is not beholden to the market and should have news flow going forward. Like many companies, it still needs discovery news as a spark for a bigger move however.
After months of nothing but ugly, the market for resource stocks finally took a meaningful turn for the better. We all know the reason for that. US Fed chief Bernanke delivered on QE3 and the gold market responded.
The chart below shows how impressive the rally that kicked off in August has been.
Bernanke telegraphed his move and the markets were already cheering a push by the ECB for its own money printing. By the time the Fed announcement of $40 billion a month in mortgage backed bond purchases was announced a lot of the gain was in. Since the announcement there has been another up-leg in price but that move appears to be stalled out in the $1770-1780 range. Where do we go from here?
The Fed’s actions have weakened the Dollar but for the trend to continue there needs to be more “risk on” trading. Even better would be progress by Europe or other currency blocks that leads to traders exiting the greenback to go long Euros or other currencies.
QE3 has certainly taken care of the risk-on part of the equation. That was probably the Fed’s main aim, in fact. Yes the buying will lower long term yields a little more but it also goosed the major market indices which we suspect was the major reason for doing it.
Notwithstanding anemic economic stats consumer confidence has been rising steadily in the US. This has much to do with gains in the stock market. Equities are a bigger part of the personal balance sheet for Americans than others. Seeing their 401Ks growing (those with jobs, that is) is making Americans more confident. So too is increasing evidence that the housing market is finally bottoming after five years of pain.
This confidence is not showing up in spending numbers yet. Other concerns like the Fiscal Cliff have been holding back hiring. The US economy needs to see some follow through for consumers to start spending. It will be tough to maintain momentum unless that happens.
In Europe, the ECB has a more complicated monetary equation to solve. Announcements of “unlimited” bond buying have helped European bourses but shareholdings are less widespread and those gains don’t impact confidence the way they do in the US.
In the case of ECB head Draghi, it’s the bond market’s confidence levels that are the main concern. As the 3 year yield chart above for Spanish and Italian bonds shows Draghi too has had some success.
Rates started falling as soon as Draghi decided to call the bluff of Euro area politicians in August. They fell farther as the plan to buy bonds was outlined early this month but doubts have begun to creep in. “Unlimited buying” made for good headlines but the latest European plan is as opaque as its many predecessors.
In order to appease creditor countries the ECB plan calls for countries that need ECB backstopping their sovereign bonds to ask for help and to be willing to submit to further conditions. Three is no indication what those conditions would be.
That was enough to spook both Spain and Italy which insist they don’t need the help. Until debtor countries ask for help ECB bond purchases will be extremely limited. Most traders think Spain at least will have no choice. Spain recently published bank stress test results that indicate its major banks need to raise $60 billion in capital, $40 billion less than the amount expected and offered by the ECB during the summer.
Even so, Spain needs to issue about €300 billion in debt this year to cover its budget shortfall and maturing debt. The odds of Draghi turning on the printing press still look good.
In Japan, the government seems powerless to defend the Yen from buyers, even though its export economy desperately needs a cheaper currency. The Bank of Japan has added $200 billion to its liquidity funds. Japan can least afford to pile up debt but its cornered in a classis liquidity trap and here too the printing press will hum.
With both risk-on trades and a known minimum amount of new money getting printed the path of least resistance for the Dollar is down. Even if the ECB starts printing too that might not change. ECB bond buying could actually strengthen the Euro in the short term as it would be considered a positive development in their debt crisis. Either way, the Dollar should be capped and gold and silver should see more gains in coming weeks and months.
Base metals and materials need stronger economic stats. Most major economies published manufacturing indices in the past few days. While most readings improved marginally all of them except the US are still showing contraction.
If Europe can complete negotiations on banking oversight and the US consumer continues to cheer up the Euro zone may also move out of contraction. China’s leadership starts its party congress on November 9th. Beijing hasn’t added any stimulus since early summer. If that is going to happen it will probably start in about a month.
The chart below shows the turn around to date in the Venture Index. It’s still at depressing levels but the rally, such as it is, is the longest we’ve seen since the market turned down in March. Here too, confidence is needed. There have been early adopters buying (like HRA) but most are still on the sidelines. Higher volumes are the clearest sign more are joining the party so watch those. We expect the rally to run to year end. How far it climbs depends on who wins the confidence game.
2012 hasn’t been an easy year for explorers but HRA has been calling for a fall rally since early in the summer. Thanks to a surging gold price that rally appears to have arrived. It’s not a broad rally yet. Traders are looking for companies with discoveries and management that knows how to add shareholder value. HRA is your key to uncovering and profiting from extraordinary resource shares by getting ahead of the crowd. At HRA, we look for companies with the potential to at least double over one or two years based on asset growth and development of metals deposits for production or take over by larger companies.
To download our latest HRA Journal for free–which includes a recent new recommendation that is making gains–click HERE now!
Published by Stockwork Consulting Ltd.
Box 85909, Phoenix AZ , 85071 Toll Free 1-877-528-3958

As soon as ex-General Electric CEO Jack Welch fired off a tweet questioning today’s just released “unbelievable jobs numbers,” the media went into a frenzy talking about how “conservatives” were launching conspiracy theories. Well, that’s handy for the media and the Obama campaign, but it’s not just “conservatives” who are confused by a full 0.3% drop in unemployment when only 114k jobs were created.
…. read more HERE

CANADIAN SUMMARY:
Leibovit Volume Reversal analysis now projects the TSX to first 13,029 and then possibly 13,529 in the months ahead based on technical action this past week!
Normally, we would expect to see a retracement back to the 12,250-12,300 zone first. Canadian equities moved higher on Thursday as the TSX Composite rose 88.21 points, or 0.71% to 12,447.68.
Note: The Great Mark Leibovit of VRTrader is Michael Campbell’s Oct 6th Money TalksGuest
CANADIAN TSX Venture:
The Venture Composite moved higher on Thursday as it rose 15.63 points or 1.18% to 1,340.85.
Resistance: 1348, 1436, 1473, 1573, 1588, 1609, 1650, 1696, 1771, 1804, 1814, 1833, 1851, 1954, 2107, 2127, 2254, 2291, 2400, 2465, 2535, 2575. Support: 1283, 1215, 1172, 1162, 1153, 950.
THE CANADIAN DOLLAR (using the FXC Exchange Traded Fund):
The Canadian Dollar moved higher on Thursday after a top Bank of Canada official suggested that rising interest rates are still a medium-term possibility. FXC rose .76 to 101.41.
Resistance is 103.08, 105.59, 108.00, 110.00, 113.00. Support is 95.30, 94.72, 93.20, 92.50 91.82, 91.00, 89.75, 87.50 and 85.18.
The Bank of Canada is still looking at the possibility of raising interest rates, but also believes there is some slack in the labour market that has not been taken up by the recovering economy, a top official said on Thursday. Tiff Macklem, senior deputy governor of the Bank of Canada, maintained the hawkish tone the bank first adopted in April in a speech to a business audience in Winnipeg, Manitoba. “To the extent that the economic expansion continues and the excess supply in the economy is gradually absorbed, some modest withdrawal of the present considerable monetary policy stimulus may become appropriate, consistent with achieving the 2 percent inflation target over the medium term,” he said, using language identical to the bank’s September 5 rate announcement. The Bank of Canada has held its key overnight target at 1 percent since mid-2010, but this year it resumed signaling its intention to tighten policy. The Canadian economy has recovered more quickly from the 2008- 09 recession than its Western peers. Most of Canada’s primary dealers expect the bank to hold rates steady until the second half of 2013 because of pressures from the troubled European and U.S. economies and slowing Chinese growth. No change is expected at the bank’s next rate announcement on October 23. While the country’s job market has recovered more quickly from the recession than in other countries, it still has a ways to go, Macklem said. The central bank closely monitors labor conditions to assess how fast the economy is growing and when a rate hike might be warranted.”With a relatively quick recovery in employment, much of the slack in the labour market following the 2009 recession has been taken up. Nevertheless, most indicators suggest that some slack remains,” Macklem said. The comments indicated the bank believes the overall economy has not yet reached its full capacity either, suggesting it may be in no rush to tighten monetary policy. “Gauging the tightness of the labour market is a key element in assessing how close the economy is operating relative to its capacity, which, in turn, is an important indicator of inflationary pressures,” Macklem said. Growth has to exceed an annualized 2.0 percent for excess capacity to be absorbed, according to calculations by the Bank of Canada, which has predicted third quarter growth would rise to 2.0 percent from a revised 1.9 percent in the second. Growth expectations are fairly tepid after downward revisions to June gross domestic product growth neutralized an unexpected 0.2 percent monthly gain in July. Annual inflation in August was well below the bank’s 2 percent target.
Mark Leibovit
VRTRADER.COM Trial Signup: Use this month to kick our tires. Pay 50% for the first 30 days (No refund) and sample our Silver or Platinum service and then decide what works best for you. Just send an email to mark.vrtrader@gmail.com” or call 928-282-1275
Mark Leibovit’s Gold Letter, # 1 Gold Timer for 10 year period & #2 Gold Timer for 2011
IF YOU HAVE NOT SIGNED UP FOR THE LEIBOVIT VR GOLD LETTER, HERE IS YOUR CHANCE. THE October 5th EDITION IS HOT OFF THE PRESS. HERE IS THE LINK: WWW.VRGOLDLETTER.COM. YOU GET A 50% DISCOUNT FOR THE FIRST MONTH.
The Annual Forecast Model is now ‘on-line’ BUT YOU MUST SUBSCRIBE! It is a premium report. Call or email us today for a 50% discount.
Here is the link:
https://www.vrtrader.com/subscribe/index.asp
The Annual Forecast Model (The VR Forecaster Report) is published each and every year in early February and comprises Mark Leibovit’s proprietary cyclical forecast for the Dow Industrials and Gold. Don’t miss the opportunity to see this Report that projects market direction and/or important cyclical change points months in advance. We have called it our ‘Blueprint to the Future’. Unique to Mark Leibovit it has been published since the mid 1980s. Access to the report is provided via the website using the username and password provided to you


Investors are concerned about inflation. But how can investors attempt to inflation-proof their portfolios? Buy TIPS? Short Treasury bonds? Stocks? Real Estate? Commodities? Gold? Currencies? Or should investors regard those warnings about inflation as fear mongering?
Indeed, as the Federal Reserve (Fed) announced its latest round of quantitative easing (“QE3”), gauges of future inflation expectations spiked. In our assessment, the market reacted strongly as it became apparent that the Fed is moving away from its focus on inflation to a focus on employment. We believe the Fed wants to raise the price level so as to bail out millions of homeowners that are ‘under water’, i.e. owe more on their homes than they are worth. Fed Chair Bernanke considers a healthy housing market to be key to healthy consumer spending (see our Merk Insight Don’t worry, be Happy).
Judging from the market reaction to QE3, fears about future inflation are warranted. Having said that, market fears about looming inflation have calmed down a bit since the initial flare up. Could it be this calming of the market is due to the fact that the Fed is intervening in the TIPS market? TIPS are “inflation protected” Treasury securities that are linked to the Consumer Price Index. Investors buying TIPS do so in the hope that their purchasing power might be protected. When the Fed intervenes in the market to buy TIPS (or any other security for that matter), such securities are intentionally over-priced, raising doubt as to whether investors are truly “protected” from inflation. It’s not just investors that now have more limited access to measuring inflation expectations – it’s also the Fed itself. By managing the entire yield curve (short-term through long-term interest rates), we believe the Fed has blindfolded itself, as it has taken away one of the most important gauges about the health of the economy. Aside from the Fed’s intervention in the TIPS market, the government is free to change the inflation adjustment factor employed in TIPS before the securities mature. TIPS payouts are adjusted using the consumer price index (CPI), which has seen methodology changes many times. When the recent debt ceiling impasse was discussed, both Republicans and Democrats talked in favor of changing the CPI definition so that it would nominally live up to inflation linked entitlement promises while clearly eroding the purchasing power of such payouts. Even without such gimmickry, the CPI may not be reflective of the basket of goods and services consumed by investors as they approach retirement given, for example, that healthcare may comprise an ever-increasing part of one’s spending. Alas, much of investing is about trying to preserve purchasing power and, alas, buying TIPS may not provide adequate protection.
If one is negative about the inflation outlook, why not simply short Treasuries, either directly or through ETFs? While we are pessimistic about the long-term outlook of Treasuries, it can be very costly to short them, given that – as a short seller – one has to continuously pay the interest of the securities one shorts. If one buys an ETF shorting Treasuries, the cost of the ETF is to be added. Shorting Treasuries might make sense for investors that are good at market timing. However, calling the top in major bubbles is rather difficult, just reflect on former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan’s “irrational exuberance” speech years ahead of the stock market collapse in 2000; similarly, those that saw the bubble in the housing market coming didn’t necessarily get the timing right.
If TIPS don’t provide enough bang for the buck, and shorting Treasuries can be costly, what about buyingstocks? Bernanke appears to use every opportunity possible to praise the benefits QE has on rising stock prices. While we agree that QE has pushed stock prices higher, it may be dangerous for the Fed to praise this link given that it raises expectations of more Fed easing whenever the markets plunge (see Merk Insight: Bernanke Put). For example, how many investors buy Cisco 1 shares because of the great management skills of CEO John Chambers as compared to those who buy because of QE3? We pose this question because stocks are rather volatile; not only are stocks volatile, but the volatility of stocks can be all over the place. Historically, the annualized standard deviation of the S&P 500 index hovers in the mid 20% range, with outbursts into the 40% range in 2008. So why are investors taking on the “noise” of the stock market, when the reason they invest is because of QE? Indeed, our analysis shows that investors appear to be ever more chasing the next perceived intervention by policy makers rather than investing based on fundamentals. That’s not only bad for capital formation (these misallocations are summarily referred to as “bubbles” these days), but also suggests that we might want to look for a more direct way to take a position on what we call the “mania” of policy makers.
Talking about policy makers: you might not agree with them, but if there is one good thing to be said about our policy makers, it is that they may be quite predictable.
What about real estate? In the U.S., depending on where one lives, the real estate market has bottomed out or appears to be bottoming out. With what appears to be the Fed’s razor sharp focus on real estate, it might be foolish to bet against the Fed. Indeed, yours truly bought a property in Palo Alto in late 2009. Unlike other real assets, keep in mind that real estate is often purchased with borrowed money; as such, it is prone to speculative bubbles such as the most recent episode. Investing in REITs might allow one to allocate a smaller share of one’s portfolio to real estate; a downside of REITs is that they tend to be highly correlated with equity markets. As policy makers steer equity prices, everything appears to be ever more highly correlated, investors may want to look for something that offers low correlation to other investments.
That brings us to commodities. In a world where policy makers appear to favor growth at just about any cost, commodity prices have been beneficiaries. As we have seen in recent weeks, it is not a one-way street, as dynamics within the market can be rather complex. The dynamics for commodities within agriculture differ from those in metals or energy. There are special considerations in storing and delivering many commodities, creating challenges for investors. We agree that commodities might do well in the long run, but urge investors to consider all the risks that come with investing in commodities. Notably, commodities can have stretches of low volatility, luring investors to jump in, only to be greeted with a jolt that can be rather hazardous to one’s wealth. As a simple rule of thumb: if you can’t sleep at night with your investment, you own too much of it.
Gold is worth singling out as the one commodity that has arguably the least industrial use. Rather than writing gold off as a barbaric relic, we like gold: its relative simplicity might make it the investment purest in reflecting monetary policy. In the medium term, we believe gold may be a good inflation hedge. But, again, keep in mind that price movements can be rather volatile. Even staunch gold bugs rarely have all their assets in gold.
This leads us to currencies as a potentially attractive way to diversify beyond gold. The Chinese have long diversified their reserves to a basket of currencies, in an effort to mitigate their U.S. dollar exposure. Some say currencies are difficult to understand. We argue that it is far easier to understand the dynamics of ten major currencies, as well as others worth monitoring, than to understand the dynamics of thousands of stocks. Importantly, we believe the currency markets might be an ideal place to take a position on the mania of policy makers. Indeed, as we believe that the Fed might want to debase the U.S. dollar (Please see Fed may want to debase dollar), why not express that view in the currency markets? Unlike their reputation, currencies are far less volatile than equities: if one does not employ leverage, a move in the euro by 1 cent is rather small on a percentage basis. The U.S. dollar index has historically had an annualized standard deviation of returns in the low teens; in 2008, that volatility rose a tad, approaching the mid-teens. For investors looking for predictability on the risks in a portfolio, the currency markets have historically shown a far more consistent risk profile than equities or many other asset classes. A corollary is that during market downturns, unlevered currency strategies may offer some downside protection given the lower risk profile. This clearly doesn’t mean an investment in currencies is safe; but managed currency risk can be seen as an opportunity given the purchasing power risk taken by holding U.S. dollars.
If investors agree that the Fed: a) may want to have – or at least accept – higher inflation; and b) may not readily see the warning signs of higher inflation, then it appears to us prudent to take the risk of higher inflation into account. Indeed, for those managing money on behalf of others, it might be their fiduciary duty to take that risk into account. Those that ignore the risk of inflation might do so at their own peril. Many investors might feel they can take action once inflation is obvious. “Obvious” is in the eye of the beholder: just as we preferred to be early in warning about the crisis in 2008, it appeared rather challenging to reposition one’s portfolio in October 2008. Gold has gone up by a factor of about 7 since its lows. The dollar has fallen relative to a basket of currencies over the past 10, 30 and 100 years: in our assessment, we simply have the better printing press. Hedging inflation risk isn’t about being right about the future; it’s about the risk of being right.
Axel Merk
Axel Merk is President and Chief Investment Officer, Merk Investments
Merk Investments, Manager of the Merk Funds
