Timing & trends
September is often a bad month for the stock markets, historically speaking, and this year it could be especially turbulent. In addition to all the uncertainty about the weak US economy, there is uncertainty about what the Fed may do just ahead and what, if anything, will be done to address Europe’s recession and debt crisis. In addition, there is the looming presidential election which no doubt will go hyperbolic this month.
To begin this discussion, with all of its variables, let’s take a look at the precarious position the US stock market is in based on recent price action. The Dow Jones Industrial Average failed once again to break out decisively above overhead resistance at the 13,250 level in August.
This is the third time this year that the DJIA has failed at this level, and that could be a bearish development on its own – before we take into account a number of additional potentially negative possibilities that could show up this month. Let’s consider them.
The global stock markets are looking for answers on three big fronts in September:
- Can European leaders and policy makers put into action the promises made this summer for dealing with the debt crisis?
- Will the sputtering US economy get another dose of monetary stimulus on September 13 at the conclusion of the next monetary policy meeting?
- Will the next batch of data show China’s economy getting better or worse? Some worry that China’s economy will be the next to fall into a recession.
Any one of these issues could undermine investor confidence to the point that it triggers a new bear market in stocks. All of this comes against the backdrop of a very close US presidential election that could determine the country’s fiscal path for years to come. And all of this follows the month of August when trading volume in the markets was exceptionally weak, perhaps in anticipation of fireworks this month.
Central bankers in both Europe and the US will play a pivotal role in September, as we will see if their hints of more monetary easing – which kept stocks aloft during the summer months – come true.
There is a meeting of the European Central Bank this Thursday (Sept. 6), and the markets are looking to see whether the ECB will cut rates. More importantly, the markets will be watching to see if European leaders will approve purchasing sovereign debt of troubled countries.
This issue takes center stage following ECB President Mario Draghi’s recent comments that the ECB would do “whatever it takes” to defend the euro. Draghi pledged to buy short-dated Spanish and Italian bonds one month ago, and now the market hopes to see him add details about the size and scope of such purchases and any other “non-standard” forms of easing that might be on the table.
The European Commission is expected to have a proposal on a banking union by next Tuesday (Sept. 11), ahead of the EU leader’s summit in December. The ECB is expected to then have the supervisory role, and the proposed new “European Stability Mechanism” – if Germany’s court backs it – could then be used to recapitalize European banks.
That decision is expected to come on Wednesday of next week (Sept. 12), when a German Constitutional Court will decide whether the proposed new European bailout fund, the ESM, is legal. If approved, the much larger ESM would succeed the current limited EFSF bailout fund. Many also believe that this month could be the time when European leaders decide once and for all whether or not to issue “Eurobonds” which Germany vehemently opposes.
Finally, there is a critical decision that will likely come this month in regard to Greece. Earlier this year, Greece formally requested additional time for implementing further austerity measures. The European Commission, the ECB and the IMF – the so-called “Troika” – are expected to render a decision before the end of September.
Germany and France have refused to extend the time frame thus far, and Athens is scrambling to make cuts. The Troika will be assessing whether Greece will ever be able to get out from under its onerous debt burden, which is 160% of its GDP. It remains to be seen what the Troika will decide. If the answer is no, Greece could decide to default and exit the euro. We all know what that will mean for the global stock markets!
Then there’s the key Fed Open Market Committee (FOMC) policy meeting that also begins next Wednesday, which could determine whether the Fed will conduct a new round of easing this fall. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, in his Jackson Hole speech Friday, again said the Fed could do another round of easing, if necessary, giving the markets fresh commentary to consider as that important meeting approaches (more on this below).
Before the Fed meeting next Wednesday is this Friday’s key release of the August employment report, the day after President Obama’s big convention speech. The August employment report is the last big data point for the Fed to consider ahead of the upcoming FOMC meeting. It is also one of three final employment reports ahead of the US election, and political analysts expect employment to be a big factor for voters.
Ahead of Friday’s report, economists expect that just under 120,000 jobs were created in August, following 163,000 new jobs in the July report. That could be a big disappointment which could send the stock markets lower.
Finally, there are concerns on the part of some that China’s economy will fall into recession next year. I don’t happen to believe that China will fall into recession just ahead. China’s economy has slowed this year, but growth is still believed to be somewhere north of 3-4%, maybe even 5%.
These are just some of the key unknowns that will likely be resolved – or not resolved – this month. If you think about it, there are no clear-cut answers for any of these problems. And the equity markets could react negatively, no matter what decisions are reached or not reached.
Now let’s turn our eyes to the latest economic reports from the US.
The Economy Sends Mixed Signals in August
The Commerce Department revised its estimate of 2Q GDP growth from 1.5% to 1.7% (annual rate), following growth of 1.9% in the 1Q. The latest report was right in line with the pre-report consensus and confirms once again that economic growth is anemic.
The Consumer Confidence Index unexpectedly plunged from 65.4 in July to 60.6 in August, the lowest since last November. The pre-report consensus was for an increase to 66.0, so the dive was a surprise. Yet the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index actually increased in August to 74.3 for reasons unknown. However in that same survey, 50% said their current situation is worse than it was five years ago. That tells the real story.
The Consumer Confidence Index, which was based on a survey conducted August 1 – 16 with about 500 randomly selected people nationwide, underscored that anxiety. The Index is widely watched because consumer spending accounts for 70% of GDP. It has remained well below the 90 reading that indicates a healthy economy – a level it hasn’t touched since the recession began in December 2007.
In the latest reading, the percentage of consumers expecting business conditions to improve over the next six months declined to 16.5% from 19% the month before. Those expecting more jobs in the months ahead declined to 15.4% from 17.6%, while those expecting fewer jobs rose to 23.4% from 20.6%.
On the manufacturing front, the ISM Index dipped below the key 50.0% mark in July, falling to 49.8%. This morning, the Institute for Supply Management reported that the Index fell further in August to 49.6%. Any reading below 50.0% in the Index is an indication that the economy is contracting.
On the unemployment front, initial claims for unemployment benefits rose to 372,000 in last Thursday’s report, up from 368,000 the prior week. The August unemployment report will be out this Friday, and the consensus is that it will remain unchanged at 8.3%.
Fortunately, not all the economic news of late has been bad. Durable goods orders in July were better than expected at 4.2%, up from 1.6% the month before. Retail sales were better than expected in July at 0.8%, up from -0.7% in June. Industrial production rose 0.6% in July, up from 0.1% in June. Factory orders were also better than expected in July. The Index of Leading Economic Indicators rose to 0.4% in July, up from -0.4% in June.
On the housing front, there was also some good news. Existing home sales rose to the highest level in over two years in July at 4.47 million units. New home sales also matched a two-year high in July, up 3.6% to 372,000 units. New permits for building homes rose 6.8% in July to 812,000 units, the highest rate since August 2008. Housing starts, on the other hand, unexpectedly fell 1.1% to 746,000 units in July.
While there was some good news in the economic reports released in August, the big drop in consumer confidence has to be concerning. Consumer spending, as we all know, is the big driver of the economy, and the significant drop in August is not a good sign.
Where Does the US Economy Go From Here?
The US economy is lousy, we can all agree on that. But what does it look like beyond this year? What follows is an updated snapshot of consensus economist estimates for GDP growth (quarter over quarter %) and the unemployment rate going out to the 1Q of 2014. The consensus estimates come from Bloomberg surveys of dozens of economists on a regular basis.
As shown in the first chart below, GDP growth is expected to still be below 2% in the 1Q of 2013. Economists are then expecting GDP to grow by 2.4% in 2Q 2013, 2.6% in 3Q ’13, 2.8% in 4Q ’13 and 2.95% in 1Q 2014. Unfortunately, 3%+ GDP growth is not expected at any point in the next year and a half.
Along with sub-3% GDP growth, economists aren’t expecting a significant drop in the unemployment rate over the next year and a half either. The consensus expectation for unemployment is 8% or higher through 2Q 2013, and then it dips by 20 basis points per quarter over the next three quarters. The unemployment rate does not drop below 8% until the 3Q of next year. By Q1 2014, the unemployment rate is only expected to be down to 7.5%, based on the average estimate of the economists surveyed.
As always, keep in mind that these estimates are those of “mainstream” economists, many of whom are employed by big banks and institutions. As a group, they are often wrong and their projections work on the theory that we won’t have a recession or another financial crisis – neither of which can be ruled out, in my opinion.
Bernanke’s Jackson Hole Speech – Mixed Signals
Analysts far and wide were hoping for clues in the Fed Chairman’s speech last Friday at the annual economic symposium in Jackson Hole, WY. Some came away optimistic that the Fed will announce QE3 at the upcoming FOMC meeting on September 12-13, while others felt just the opposite. So depending on who you read, you could have taken either position.
In his speech, Bernanke made the case that the first two rounds of QE were successful in helping the economy, a position that many would argue. He also suggested that QE3 – if it were to happen – would also be beneficial. In addition, he also stated:
“Unless the economy begins to grow more quickly than it has recently, the unemployment rate is likely to remain far above levels consistent with maximum employment for some time…. The Federal Reserve will provide additional policy accommodation as needed to promote a stronger economic recovery and sustained improvement in labor market conditions in a context of price stability.”
These remarks and others made The Wall Street Journal‘s MarketWatch.com conclude that Bernanke “made it clear that he’s ready to pull the trigger. The only question that remains is whether it will happen in mid-September or December.”
But while Bernanke made clear that the Fed is willing to intervene via QE3 – if necessary – he also left no doubt that he wants to avoid this if at all possible. Bernanke continued to caution that there are hard-to-quantify downside risks to QE, including higher inflation and the question of how the Fed will unload potentially several trillion dollars in debt securities at some point.
Then there is the question of timing, given that this is an election year. Would the Fed move to implement QE3 at its September 12-13 meeting next week, or would it wait until December? Some argue that the Obama administration would be reluctant to publicly endorse another large round of asset purchases by the Fed, as it would be seen as an admission by the White House that the economy is in dire straits. Privately, however, I would think the Obama administration would welcome it.
At the end of the day, most observers agree that the Fed is willing to do QE3, but probably only if it looks like the economy could be tipping into a recession. Time will tell. If Bernanke does not announce QE3 at next week’s press conference on Thursday (Sept. 13), then I think it’s safe to assume the Fed will do nothing until after the election.
My Thoughts on the Republican Convention
Finally, I suppose I should comment on the Republican convention. Overall, I thought it was very good. With the help of his wife, a couple of very good personal videos and a good closing speech, I think Mitt Romney accomplished what he needed to do. Even the talking heads on MSNBC and CNN agreed.
Many conservatives wished that Romney had been tougher on President Obama, but apparently he and his advisers felt it was better for him to stay above the fray and hope to convince undecided voters that he is human after all. While more post-convention polls will be out later this week, it looks like Romney got a “bounce” of 4-5 points. We’ll see. In any event, the race should remain fairly close.
The bigger question is, what do the Democrats do for three days starting tonight? Without much of a record to run on, the Obama campaign has spent almost all of its money trying to demonize Romney, which hasn’t worked. If they try to do that for four days on national TV, the relatively few viewers that are watching these conventions will tune out early-on.
So it will be most interesting to see what they come up with. The speaker line-up is not very impressive overall, although Bill Clinton’s speech tomorrow night will draw a lot of attention as it should. Other speakers include Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry and Jimmy Carter.
Most notably, Hillary Clinton will not make an appearance, much less a speech. The most powerful woman in the Democrat Party will not even attend. Hmmm…. Makes you wonder who made that decision – Obama or Hillary?
“2016: Obama’s America” Movie – You Need to See It
Last week, I encouraged you to go see 2016, especially because it is a documentary on Barack Obama’s life and the major influences on him. I admitted that I learned several things about our president that I did not know. I’m not much of a movie goer, but I am going to see it a second time this weekend. I can’t remember the last time I saw a movie twice in theater. You really need to see it!
Over this summer, I have raised the possibility that some of President Obama’s policies have been a part of a grand plan to reduce America’s dominance in the world. Based on the huge response I have received with regard to that notion, it is clear that many of you agree on this point. That is why you need to see this movie. It is eye-opening.
I said this last week, but it bears repeating. I believe that this film will set off alarm bells, even among some liberals. I suspect that more than a few liberals will come away from the movie and conclude: Wait, that’s NOT what I signed up for! If you see the movie, you will know exactly why I say this.
Here is the link to the 2016 movie trailer: http://2016themovie.com.
Have a great week, and keep your seatbelts fastened for a potentially wild September.
Wishing summer wasn’t drawing to a close,
Gary D. Halbert

Well, we have to distinguish several factors. First of all, on QE1 the market in March 2009 was unbelievably oversold and so the market was ready for a rebound and as you know that if you print money, it goes somewhere and in the US it went principally into equity prices and into corporate profits. We have record corporate profits which is unusual because revenue growth is actually very disappointing, very little revenue growth. But there are record profits and I do not think these profits are sustainable.
Moreover, the markets are no longer oversold. We are above 1400 on the S&P and compared to other markets in the world, say if you compare the performance of the US stock markets to foreign markets, over the last 18 months in early 2011 the US market had outperformed just about anything else and therefore actually by international comparison the US market is quite high and my view would be every central bank will print money, including the ECB, directly or indirectly, whatever they may call it, but they will do it. The European markets, some of them like France, Italy, Spain, Greece and Portugal, two months ago were either below the 2009 low or close to the 2009 low on the S&P that would be the equivalent of 666. So relative to other markets, some European stocks are now very inexpensive.
Invest in Europe Now


There is an ongoing three way debate between those who believe the Fed should do more to strengthen the recovery, those who believe that the recovery is strong enough to continue on its own, and those who believe that the economy has been so fundamentally altered by the recession that no amount of stimulus can succeed in pushing unemployment down to pre-crash levels. As usual, they all have it wrong (although some are more wrong than others).
The false conclusions are being made by the likes of bond king Bill Gross, who has suggested that the economic fundamentals have changed. They argue that a “new normal” is now in place that sets an 8% unemployment rate as a floor below which we will never fall. This is absurd. America can once again prosper if we put our trust in first principles and let the free markets work. Unfortunately, that is not happening. Government is taking an ever greater role in our economy where its efforts will continue to stifle economic growth. A close second in cluelessness comes from those who believe that we are currently on the road to a real recovery. I’m not sure what economy they are looking at, but in just about every important metric, we continue to be essentially comatose.
More accurate are the opinions of those who believe that without a more serious intervention from the Fed, which can only mean another round of quantitative easing (QE III), the current quasi-recovery will soon fade and the tides of recession will overtake us once again. They are correct. And even though this time the water will be rougher and deeper than it was four years ago, it does not mean that the Fed will do the economy any good by breaking out its heavy artillery once again.
In his widely anticipated speech at Jackson Hole last week, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke sounded a supremely optimistic note: “It seems clear, based on this experience, that such (easing) policies can be effective, and that, in their absence, the 2007-09 recession would have been deeper and the current recovery would have been slower than has actually occurred.”
The simple truth however, is that our economy has a disease that all the quantitative easing in the world can’t cure. And while the wrong medicine may make us appear healthier in the short term, we will continue to deteriorate beneath the surface. Not only should the Fed not provide additional QE, but it should remove the accommodation currently in place. Although these moves would most certainly send us back into recession, it would simultaneously provide a needed course correction that would put us finally on the road to a sustainable recovery.
The recession the Fed is trying so desperately to prevent must be allowed to run its course so that the economy that we have developed over the last decade, the one that is overly reliant on low interest rates, borrowing and consumer spending, can finally restructure itself into something healthier. By enabling this diseased economy to overstay its welcome, QE does more harm than good. To recover for the long haul, the market must be allowed to correct the misallocations of resources that resulted from prior stimulus. Additional stimulus inhibits this process, and exacerbates the size of the misallocations the markets must eventually correct.
In the interim, any GDP growth or employment gains that result from stimulus actually compounds the difficulty in restructuring the economy. Any jobs created as a result of cheap monetary stimulus are jobs that won’t be able to survive absent that support. They will require a continual misallocation of resources in order to survive. Unfortunately, these jobs must ultimately be lost before a real recovery can actually begin.
Holding rates of interest far below market levels (which is the goal of stimulus) alters patterns of consumption, savings, and investment. Fed intervention short-circuits the market driven process that resolves misallocations. The more stimulus that is provided, the harder market forces must work to try to restore equilibrium. As the misallocations grow over time, the efficacy of monetary measures diminishes. In the end, the market will overwhelm the Fed. The only question is how long it will take.
The Fed is trying to build skyscrapers on a bad foundation. Each subsequent structure it builds not only collapses, but also weakens the foundation that much more. The result is that subsequent structures collapse at increasingly lower heights and require more effort to build. Instead of trying to build, the Fed could concentrate on repairing the underlying foundation. That might delay construction, but in the end the buildings will be much sturdier.
Because the Fed has kept interest rates too low for too long, Americans have saved too little and borrowed too much; consumed too much and produced too little; and imported too much and exported too little. Too much of our labor is devoted to the service sectors and not enough to goods production. Too much capital goes to Wall Street speculators and not enough to Main Street entrepreneurs. We built too many homes but not enough factories. We have developed too many shopping centers, and not enough natural resources. The list of Fed induced misallocations goes on.
By trying to preserve the jobs associated with this old economy, the Fed prevents the market from creating the ones we actually need. Unfortunately no one seems to understand that, and we continue to chase blindly after failed economic models. Look for such misunderstanding to be on high display this week in Charlotte as Democrats gather to call for even greater intervention to perpetuate a failed economic model.
Peter Schiff’s new book, The Real Crash: America’s Coming Bankruptcy – How to Save Yourself and Your Country is now available. Order your copy today.
For in-depth analysis of this and other investment topics, subscribe to Peter Schiff’s Global Investor newsletter. CLICK HERE for your free subscription.

The Debt can never be paid off through “normal” means. Paying off by normal means would entail a huge, really killer boost in taxes and a brutal unmerciful, slashing of entitlements. The national debt of the US is now well over $16 trillion and growing at the rate of over one trillion dollars a year.
The only way the US’s debts can ever be seriously addressed is to devalue the dollar.
The US owns the world’s greatest hoard of gold. Here’s what I think the authorities have to do. They should unilaterally, overnight raise the price of gold to a high value, maybe around $10,000 an ounce. Thus, each dollar would be worth one ten-thousandth of an ounce of gold. This would allow our enormous debt to be paid off with vastly devalued dollars.
This would be inflationary, since everyone who owned gold would own a pile of devalued dollars. The huge increase in the number of dollars would drive prices up, and that would work against the current forces of deflation.
Nations owning gold would in turn (in order to compete) — devalue their own currencies, and thus be able to pay off their own “impossible” debts. In the end, a new world monetary system would have to be established, but the terrible problem of a planet choking on debt would be solved.
I think this is the only way the world-debt problem is going to be solved. It will, in the end, be solved by devaluation (as Roosevelt did in 1933, when he suddenly and unilaterally raised the price of gold from 20 to 35 dollars an ounce). Interestingly, we now hear an increasing amount of talk regarding gold entering the world monetary system. Furthermore, I think we are going to hear even more about gold in future months. Smart, wealthy, well-informed investors will start accumulating gold. (Soros and Paulson are doing it already. I don’t doubt that Soros has inside information.)
I also believe that the US will, in due time, start backing its currency with part-gold and the dollar will be convertible into gold at around $10,000 an ounce. This will render the dollar the most wanted currency in the world.
I believe the Chinese are onto the same idea. But as of now, China does not own as much gold as they desire, which is one reason China has rushed headlong into the gold business — China is currently the world’s biggest producer of gold. It is also why China is encouraging its own people to buy and accumulate gold. China knows that gold is the future of the world monetary system.
Ed Note: Central Banks are buying Gold, here’s 3 articles:
Central-Bank Gold Buying Seen Reaching 493 Tons In 2012
Is Central Bank buying just a driving force behind gold or much, much more!
Central Bank Action “Good for Gold”, ECB Bazooka Needed as Pressure on Spain Intensifies
Richard Russell publishes a detailed Daily comment, the latest Primary Trend Index (PTI) figure for the day will be posted on his web site — posting will take place a few hours after the close of the market. Also included will be Russell’s comments and observations on the day’s action along with critical market data. Each subscriber will be issued a private user name and password for entrance to the members area of the website.if you subscribe to his Letter that is published and mailed every three weeks. To subscribe go HERE
Russell also offers a TRIAL. (two consecutive up-to-date issues) for $1.00 (same price that was originally charged in 1958). Trials, please one time only. Mail your $1.00 check to: Dow Theory Letters, PO Box 1759, La Jolla, CA 92038 (annual cost of a subscription is $300, tax deductible if ordered through your business).
Investors Intelligence is the organization that monitors almost ALL market letters and then releases their widely-followed “percentage of bullish or bearish advisory services.” This is what Investors Intelligence says about Richard Russell’s Dow Theory Letters: “Richard Russell is by far the most interesting writer of all the services we get.” Feb. 19, 1999.
Below are two of the most widely read articles published by Dow Theory Letters over the past 40 years. Request for these pieces have been received from dozens of organizations. Click on the titles to read the articles.
