Bonds & Interest Rates

The Best Dividend Stocks for May 31, 2012

Here is a current overview of the best yielding stocks with a market capitalization over USD2 billion that have their ex-dividend date on the next trading day. If your broker settles your trade today, you will receive the next dividend. A full list of all stocks with ex-dividend date can be found here: Ex-Dividend Stocks May 31, 2012. In total, 21 stocks and preferred shares go ex-dividend of which 6 are yielding above 3 percent. The average yield amounts to 3.94 percent.

The ex-dividend date is a major date related to the payment of dividends. If you purchase a stock on its ex-dividend date or later, you will not receive the next dividend payment. Instead, the seller gets the dividend. If you purchase before the ex-dividend date, you get the dividend. It is important that your broker settles your trade before the ex-dividend date.

…..read about the 9 Dividend Stocks HERE

Visit Dividend’s Website http://long-term-investments.blogspot.ca/

dividends

Why the Recent Dow Theory Bear Signal is “Particularly Valid”

The one Dow Theorist who says a sell signal was generated by this oldest and most famous of stock market timing systems is none other than Richard Russell, the 89 year old editor of Dow Theory Letters. He wrote to clients over the weekend to deliver the bad news that it was a “textbook bear signal”. 

It should be noted that it was nearly two weeks ago when the two Dow Averages broke below their respective April lows. So Russell’s announcement over the weekend was not exactly breaking news.

But Russell nevertheless believes that the Dow Theory sell signal he now detects is all the more significant precisely because he missed it initially, along with virtually all other Dow Theorists he monitors. He writes that his interpretation is “particularly valid because nobody seemed to notice it [the Dow Theory sell signal], nor did any analyst appear to be aware of it. I know of no analyst or advisor who stated that we had seen a primary bear signal!”

….read more HERE

Growling Bear

Exactly one year ago to the day, gold traded at $1,526 for a one-year gain of a modest 2.6%.

A year ago, the S&P 500 traded at 1,325, while today it trades at 1,318, a small loss. Yet, have you noticed we don’t hear much about the imminent collapse of the US stock market, as we do about gold? This perma-bear sentiment about gold on the part of what some people lump together under the label “Wall Street” is especially apparent in the gold stocks.

Using the GDX ETF as a proxy for the sector, we see that the shares of the more substantial gold producers are off by an unpleasant 24% over the last year. With that “baseline” in place, let’s turn to the current outlook for gold, and touch on some of the other commodities as well.

…read the whole  HERE

….

AN EXCELLENT LESSON FROM DENNIS GARTMAN

THIS WAS BAD ADVICE: A well known hedge fund manager… who shall remain anonymous for we see no reason in making more enemies than we already have on The Street… was short of the Netflix last year, selling it at prices above $200/share. One would think that this hedge fund manager would be ecstatic about what has happened to Netflix since but one would be wrong, for this gentleman covered his short position at or near $250/share, losing a great deal of money, all the more sad given that NFLX is now trading nearer to $75/share and has been rather obviously bearishly in the news of late. (written October 2011 – Ed)

What do we find sad about this manager’s position and his advice given earlier this week in an interview with The Wall Street Journal? We find it sad that the manager said that in retrospect he should have believed his own analysis; should have remained short and should have added to his losing position as the price moved above $250/share rather than covering. This is nonsense; this is bad trading of the worst kind and this is the sort of thing that the public really must needs avoid. Having had the stock move against him from $200 to $250, the market was shouting at this manager that he was wrong and badly so. Adding to a losing trade is the only sure way to eventual failure in this business of trading. Ask Nick Leeson, or ask the boys at Long Term Capital Management… they’ll tell you.

There was plenty of time as NFLX began to falter to have been short of this stock, and indeed, it was a much better short at $175 and was
falling than at $250 and rising, for at least when it was falling one who was bearish had the bearish wind at his back. ‘tis always better to trade that way than to be heroic and try to find the top… which one never, ever can anyway. Ask us; we know!

To this we add our own story, for we were short several thousand shares of NFLX a month or so ago in our own personal account and got the benefit of the first $35/share plunge. What did we do? We handled this poorly, covering that day because that seemed like an excessive… an egregious… over-extension to the downside. How wrong we were, however, as NFLX stock has fallen another $45/share from that level and we are out and have missed that plunge. Our error was almost as ill- advised as was that of the hedge fund manager noted above; indeed, in many respects it is worse, for our trade was never behind; it was profitable from the outset. We should have sat tight and we should have added to the trade. Live then and learn. Live then and very much learn.

Dennis Gartman

Big Opportunities Setting Up in Gold, Oil & Copper

Michael Campbell: David Bensimon declared we were in a commodity driven, prosperity driven boom, and to adjust yourself accordingly. Then coming out of the big disruption of 2008, in the last quarter of 2008 and early 2009 Bensimon said “don’t worry the Commodity Bull Market is going to reassert itself in a magnificent way”. Obviously there was major money to be made following that advice.

Now we have seen real weakness across the board in commodities,  what do you see now? Specifically is the commodity bull market over?

Whole interview begins at the 19:17 minute mark. Basic predictions transcribed below {mp3}mtmay26{/mp3}

Bensimon: The quick answer is certainly not. The commodity bull market is really a multi-decade really long term cycle. Of course in the course of any large scale long term movement there are going to be swings within that trend that go in both directions. What we are in right now is a corrective movement in a larger uptrend.

As far as some technicals and fundamentals. I am looking out the window here in town in  China and I am seeing building after building of unfinished projects that have clearly halted. So the facts on the ground are that there is a visible slowdown here in China in the construction industry which is a major part of China’s economic growth, in Europe you have a real crisis on the debt side, and these kind of forces is what is driving a pullback in commodity prices.

On specific commodities:

1. Copper

I mentioned 6 weeks ago in my quarterly report that copper is vulnerable to a 25% drop. That sounds like a big drop but in the context of markets that move in the  100’s of percentages going up 25% going down is not that large on a relative basis. The expectation was a drop from $4 back to $3 driven by the fundamentals of a slowing China and technical elements supporting a retest of that low at $3. The market in fact fell quickly to $3:50 and is now hovering around $3:40 and there is really no change to my expectation that we are in the middle of this downswing and we should reach another 10-15% to that $3:00 area, probably in mid-July.

Picture 1

2. Oil

My view back in the April report about Oil which is an even larger industrial commodity, that it would very precisely drop 14-15% from $103 to $89, which the first downleg of a slightly larger movement. It would be driven by the fundamentals of a removal of the risk premium of Iran, my expectation being that the Iranian problems would ameliorate and not explode as was being expected at that time. Also the technical elements were favoring a retreat, and as it turned out the Oil market did drop exactly that %15 from $103 to the low of $90 so far. My view here is that on a short term basis we could see a little bit of consolidation, but the general movement has not completed and I would be looking for a continuation to the low $80’s by around the middle of July as well.

Picture 2

3. Gold:

There is a very interesting situation here. In our last discussion back in January, my expectation was for a decline to a particular timing window in April. I think it is important to always highlight that price targets and time targets are always predicated on certain other technical elements that need to be invoked or triggered to confirm those particular price or time windows. In the case of Gold, the view that the market would decline to a window of opportunity in April was predicated on the market breaking through a major channel that had been guiding the market since 2008, and the last touch of that channel occurred in December 2011 just a month before we spoke. The expectation was that if that channel gave way we could fall to an important low in April. As it turned out the market did not break that channel, as the low from December held initially and the market pushed up inside that channel. But the larger fundamental forces that were evolving in the world around that time did assert themselves and pulled the market for Gold, as with all other assets, back down to that base of the channel which by then had crawled up the the $1,600 level. What happened then was that the market did break decisively through that channel at $1,600 and plunged very quickly once that trigger had been invoked. It fell to the next natural level of support which was the double bottom at $1.520 and that’s exactly where the market halted.

Its a very natural expectation that once you reach that historical support that you’ll get a reactive bounce and that is what we have seen in the last week or so with the Gold market bouncing to the high $1,500’s. This territory that we are in right now, conceivably could push as far as $1,620 without voiding the structure of the downtrend that we are in. But the very serious implication of having broken that major several year uptrend, notwithstanding whether it hits $1,620 or not, the market is going to continue now down to the next lower support below $1,520. The next lower support has two price levels, the $1,400 and $1,300 levels that I mentioned back in January. Those pricing levels are very much in play and the two timing windows are very particular dates in July and August. Any one of those combinations could be the one that materializes.

But the larger structure of the Commodity Bull Case is very much intact and if we do get that low of $1,400/$1,300 at the end of the summer that would be a beautiful, a really very structurally strong entry point to acquire positions in Gold with a view to continuing this long term bull trend that will take us up to the long term objective I’ve had for more than a decade of reaching $2,600 in 2014.

Picture 3

David Bensimon correctly called dramatic market movements throughout 1998-2012. David runs Polar Pacific which you can reach HERE