Wealth Building Strategies

What Are the 15 Most Important Investing Years?

Andrew details some of the challenges faced by investors as they enter the MOST important phase of their planning for end-of-work and retirement.

andrewnumber6

A Nightmare Scenario for OPEC

The International Energy Agency (IEA) sees demand for OPEC oil actually declining in absolute terms over the next few years as it is edged out of the market by an explosion of shale output in the US  – Robert Zurrer for Money Talks

ope

The US will supply much of the world’s additional oil for the next few years, according to a new report from the International Energy Agency (IEA).

Over the next three years, the US will cover 80 percent of the world’s demand growth, the IEA says in its newly-released Oil 2018 annual report. Canada, Brazil, and Norway will cover the remainder, leaving no room for more OPEC supply.

The irony is that the substantial gains in output from shale will only be possible because of the OPEC cuts, which has tightened the market and boosted prices. This fact is not lost on OPEC producers. “If you are a shale oil producer, who brought you back? It was OPEC,” the UAE’s oil minister Suhail Al Mazrouei, said at a recent industry conference, according to Bloomberg. “Without OPEC there’d be chaos in the market.”

Indeed, the IEA’s new report paints a pretty gloomy picture for OPEC members, who are hoping to phase out their supply cuts after this year. With non-OPEC supply rising quickly, particularly in the US, OPEC may struggle to figure out a way to increase output without pushing down prices, according to the IEA’s analysis.

That could put pressure on the cartel to keep the production cuts in place for longer than they had wanted, although it seems hard to imagine they maintain the production ceilings for another three or four years. Doing so would mean handicapping themselves and ceding even more market share to US shale and other non-OPEC producers. Still, it is unclear how this plays out – returning to full production, even if phased in gradually, presents its own problems if the IEA’s forecast is accurate.

The IEA sees demand for OPEC oil actually declining in absolute terms over the next few years as it is edged out of the market by non-OPEC supply. OPEC production only grows by 750,000 bpd through 2023 under the energy agency’s forecast, although that also takes into account a 700,000-bpd decline in Venezuela.

The bottom line is that the IEA sees oil demand rising by 6.9 million barrels per day (mb/d) by 2023, with more than half of those increases coming from China and India. Meanwhile, supply grows by about 6.4 mb/d, with a whopping 3.7 mb/d coming from the US, nearly 60 percent of the total global supply increase.

By sector, petrochemicals start to take on a larger role in driving oil demand, especially as the transportation sector starts to see a greater adoption of electric vehicles. But it isn’t just EVs – abundant oil and cheap natural gas are fueling a surge in petrochemical investments.

Nevertheless, while the IEA sees an explosion of shale output for the next five years or so, beyond that the story is different. The massive cuts to upstream investment since the collapse of oil prices in 2014 will begin to cause supply problems at the beginning of the next decade. Spending levels are only now starting to pick up but are still at a fraction of pre-2014 levels, which means that there will be a dearth of new, large-scale conventional oil projects in several years’ time. “This is potentially storing up trouble for the future,” the IEA wrote in its report.

Moreover, natural depletion from existing fields essentially wipes out 3 mb/d of supply every year. That, combined with demand growth, means that the oil industry needs to replace “one North Sea each year,” the IEA says. But the industry is no longer spending enough to cover that gap. In 2017, new oil discoveries fell to another record low, with less than 4 billion barrels of oil equivalent found. The lack of new oil in the works is sowing the seeds of supply problems in the 2020s.

“The United States is set to put its stamp on global oil markets for the next five years,” Fatih Birol, the IEA’s Executive Director, said in a statement. “But as we’ve highlighted repeatedly, the weak global investment picture remains a source of concern. More investments will be needed to make up for declining oil fields – the world needs to replace 3 mb/d of declines each year, the equivalent of the North Sea – while also meeting robust demand growth.”

The IEA report will provide a fascinating backdrop to the start of the annual CERAWeek conference in Houston, where industry titans and oil ministers will gather this week. No doubt the aggressive forecast for US shale will provide a lot of fodder for conversation for both shale boosters and anxious OPEC representatives.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

3 Amigos of the Macro, Updated

Gary makes the case that US 10yr & 30yr Interest Rates will begin to decline and the Stock Market, especially Tech, will continue to soar – Robert Zurrer for Money Talks:

You thought I was done with the Amigos shtick, did you? Not by a long shot ma’am. They are the happy-go-lucky riders in play as the stock bull market churns on. They are the rising SPX/Gold ratio and stocks in general vs. gold (Amigo #1), rising US 10yr & 30yr yields (Amigo #2) and the flattening 10-2 yield curve (Amigo #3). On their current trends these goofy riders have signaled “a-okay!” to casino patrons playing the stock market and other risk ‘on’ items.

Taking our macro indicators out of order, let’s start with Amigo #2, who we have been noting to be bracing for something…

 

amigos

What is that something? Well, it is the targets for 10yr & 30yr bond yields we laid out 4-5 months ago in a bearish case for bonds; you know, back when everyone didn’t hate bonds as is currently the case under the much more recent expert guidance of Bill, Ray and Paul? It might as well have been Ringo, George and Paul making the call.

Another Heavy Hitter Calls Bond Bear

I am not trying to come off as a contrarian bond bull, deflationist. There are very valid reasons to be open to if not expect a new and secular bond bear market. But with the yields at our targets, which were established for a reason (being caution) and with the financial eggheads fully in unison, it has come time for caution on the bond bear stance and at least some aspects of a stock bull stance.

For my part, as written on several occasions in NFTRH and in public, Treasury bonds (T bills, 1-3yr, 3-7yr & 7-10yr) are now playing a balancing role in my portfolios and spitting out monthly income to boot. Is this an investment? Absolutely not. Not with Treasury bonds overseen by the chronic debtor AKA the US government and manipulated by the chronic inflator, the Federal Reserve.

But the long-term ‘Continuum’ chart has been kind of obvious, don’t you think? While the 10yr has hit target, the 30yr dwells just under its historical limiter (and target) at 3.3% (the monthly EMA 100).

tyx

At the same time the long bond, which goes opposite its yield, has come down to its EMA 100, which has historically limited declines. This time different? Maybe. There are no absolutes. But this is a risk vs. reward business.

usb

The bottom line on Amigo #2 is that with the ‘inflation trade’ that got going in December, yields would rise along with the bullish backdrop. But if the limiter once again lives up to its name, that which was most bullish during said ‘inflation trade’ would be at risk. Since the macro moves at a snail’s pace, this is not necessarily bearish yet; but it would demand rotation and rebalancing for right minded casino patrons.

Moving on, let’s see where Amigo #1 is at. He’s the one on the left in the picture above. He’s utterly euphoric, out there riding along the foothills in the warm Mexican sun. Not a care in the world… just look at that goofy, blissful expression on his face. Indeed, despite a hard spill in February the uptrend in SPX vs. Gold is intact and the target of 2.50 is still valid. But this is a maturing situation.

We are watching companion indicators like Gold vs. Palladium, Copper and Industrial Metals for fine tuning as well. One very possible scenario is that the stock bull is not ending but the ‘inflation trade’ of the last several months is. If you get a chance have a look at the GYX/Gold ratio and think about rotation, balance and early warnings.

Last but not least is Amigo #3, the yield curve. He’s pretty much the least noticeable one in the picture. I mean, Martin Short compared to Chevy Chase and Steve Martin? Come on… He may not be as noticeable, but he is sure as hell as important, or even more so.

The daily view appears constructive for a bounce similar to the Q4 2017 bounce.

yield curve

But on the big picture the curve is still completely in a flattening trend as it flattens with a boom and steepens with economic weakening and eventually, a bust.


Bottom Line

The 2nd Amigo is the only one to have hit target (and even there the 30yr has a little wiggle room) and the others are still in process. Even if interest rates stall here, the market could simply continue to rotate (as it is currently doing as tech gets the 2018 version of a safety bid I assume due to its lack of inflation sensitivity).

The stock market is up trending vs. gold and it may take finer tuned indicators like cyclical metals vs. counter-cyclical gold to give early warnings there. But for now the first Amigo is intact.

The yield curve is probably the least sensitive indicator, but maybe the most important because when it changes trend the chart above instructs that based on years of history, it would be time for everyone to get out of the pool polluted by central bankers’ inflationary policy designed to keep asset markets afloat. It would be time to be very careful about what you own and it would be time to own the counter-cyclical metal and its miners (those of relative quality, anyway). This is antithetical to inflationist gold bugs, but it’s the way it is.

NFTRH.com and Biiwii.com

Bob Hoye on “The Art Of The Deal”

BOB HOYE

PUBLISHED BY INSTITUTIONAL ADVISORS

MARCH 9, 2018

The Art of The Deal

                                                                                                                     – Donald J. Trump, 1987.

kjun

kjun2

BOB HOYE, INSTITUTIONAL ADVISORS 

WEBSITE: www.institutionaladvisors.com 2 

On The Brink of a Terrifying Future

 

00:45 – 06:18 – What is going to happen when 51% of the US millenial generation say they’d rather live in a socialist or communist country? Michael has even more startling numbers, facts & consequences:

….related from Michael: Canada’s Slips From 4th to 11th Place!

com