Timing & trends
Was the March 2009 low the end of a secular bear market and the beginning of a secular bull? At this point, over eight years later, the S&P 500 has set a series of inflation-adjusted record highs based on monthly averages of daily closes.
Let’s examine the past to broaden our understanding of the range of historical trends in market performance. An obvious feature of this inflation-adjusted series is the pattern of long-term alternations between uptrends and downtrends. Market historians call these “secular” bull and bear markets from the Latin word saeculum “long period of time” (in contrast to aeternus “eternal” — the type of bull market we fantasize about).
….continue reading 5 more charts & analysis HERE
…also from Jill:

If you were to ask me what the most inefficient US market sector is, I would probably say, defense.
Now, that’s something no one likes to hear. How come the one sector the US government spends the most money on—the FY 2018 defense budget is $824.7 billion, more than that of the next nine countries combined—is the most inefficient?
Here’s what most people don’t understand: It’s inefficient by design.
Nobody wants war, yet governments are obliged to spend vast sums getting ready to fight it. They’re usually not very thrifty either.
For investors, that’s actually a perfect combination because inefficiency, in this case, spells opportunity. And right now is an especially good time to get your feet wet in defense spending.
Technology is changing the very nature of warfare. A lot of expensive equipment will get replaced in the next few years… and what replaces it may surprise you.
Photo: David~O via
Modern-Day Knights
Back in the Middle Ages, the most powerful weapons systems were armored men on horseback and catapults for long distances.
Modern-day knights have better armor and longer lances, their “horses” have wings or rotors, and missiles take the long-distance shots. At its core, though, warfare is still about arming soldiers and sending them to face the enemy.
That may not be the case much longer.
Drone aircraft were the first breakthrough. They enable pilots to control their planes remotely, from a safe place, firing missiles when they see an enemy. A big step, but the big drones still resemble conventional aircraft.
Photo: AP
The new drones are getting much smaller—and that will change everything.
Leaderless Swarms
A few months ago, I saw Dr. Will Roper, head of the Pentagon’s Strategic Capabilities Office, speak at the South by Southwest conference in Austin. His job is to keep our armed forces ahead of adversaries by adapting off-the-shelf commercial technology.
(I wrote more about Dr. Roper’s presentation in Yield Shark at the time. Subscribers can read it here.)
Among other things, he was very excited about “drone swarms.” He argued that large numbers of small, inexpensive, autonomous drones working together can accomplish many of the same missions as expensive aircraft and human pilots.
Key to Dr. Roper’s vision: Drone swarms have no leader an enemy can target. They operate much like a swarm of ants or bees. No single bee knows how to build a hive, protect the queen, and produce honey. But collectively, they still make it happen, which is quite impressive.
A few months ago, on 60 Minutes, Roper demonstrated some of his drones—and I bet the DoD has even better ones still under wraps. Some are small enough to hold in one hand.
That doesn’t mean the US government will stop buying fighter jets and armored vehicles. Wise generals don’t give up a capability that an enemy might have.
However, the defense industry will expand and change. Presently, leading companies profit by making sophisticated, expensive weapons platforms in relatively small numbers. Drones will be a different business. They’re small, simple, inexpensive, and the Pentagon will need a lot of them—maybe millions.
Customizing drones for particular missions will necessitate an ability to produce them quickly, as needed. Who knows, companies might even develop mobile drone factories that can deploy to a war zone and produce new swarms every day.
The Other Side
Of course, no one likes being swarmed, and there are already commercial anti-drone technologies. For example, paparazzi photographers using drones to spy on celebrities now meet everything from net-carrying counter-drones to trained falcons.
I expect we’ll see years of rapid development for both military and civilian uses. A military reconnaissance drone swarm could also quickly search large areas for lost children or shipwreck survivors.
To me, that’s the really exciting part. Some of today’s ubiquitous technology originated in military applications. I wish we could develop them for peaceful reasons, but at least we have them.
Defense technology is one of the themes I follow for Macro Growth & Income Alert subscribers. It’s an all-weather sector in which normal economic rules don’t apply.
Right now, we have two open defense stock positions. One is a blue-chip US aerospace conglomerate (up 46% since recommendation) and the other a small, Israel-based company that builds and sells drones worldwide (up 36%).
Defense stocks never go out of style, and they’re about to enter a period of rapid innovation. I think there will be more great opportunities in this sector. I’m keeping my eyes open and I suggest you do too.

- An investors worst nightmare?
- Analyzing the summer doldrums
- Plus: Time for some trading excitement
October is typically viewed as an investor’s worst nightmare.
Our bias tells us that fall is crash season. Open your history books and you’ll find plenty of horrifying drops ranging from the 1929 crash that sparked the Great Depression (Oct. 28-29) to the infamous Black Monday crash in 1987 (Oct. 19).
Yes, October can be volatile. But the dog days of summer are far worse, on average.
I know this probably goes against all your trading instincts. After all, you’ve heard stories of the painfully boring summer trading months. Cyclically, start of the third quarter isn’t an ideal time to jump into new long-term investments. That’s because July is the beginning of the Nasdaq’s worst four months of the year.
But the market fought its way to new highs last month. A third-quarter slump has been put on hold.
Perhaps the summer doldrums are waiting for a new trading month. Today is August 1st. Nothing of consequence is supposed to happen in August. The movers and shakers are living it up at their beach estates and trading rooms are quiet, right?
Not exactly. According to the Stock Trader’s Almanac, August is the worst month for the Dow, S&P, and Nasdaq since 1987. If there’s one month investors should avoid, it’s not October. August is the real performance killer.
Here’s an interesting tidbit floating around the financial blogosphere right now:
“August has been the worst month for the SPX over the last 30 years, averaging a -0.86% decline,” MKM Partners technical analyst Jon Krinsky noted in a recent report. “Of course this is just an average, and there have been some strong gains in August especially during strong uptrends (2014, 2009, 2006).”
Surprised?
You shouldn’t be. Remember the eurozone panic six years ago? The swift crash of late-July and August knocked the S&P within a hair of a legitimate 20% correction in 2011.
More recent years haven’t brought as much turmoil. But they haven’t exactly been uneventful.
A tame July led to a modest August rally in 2012. The market gave back almost all its July gains in August 2013. And a late July dip was eagerly bought in 2014.
The summer of 2015 was a doozy for investors. After an uneventful start to the third quarter, the market started to unravel in late August, falling double digits before the end of the month. That’s right – August 2015 was when the pullbacks started in the small-caps and biotech sectors that would eventually turn into nasty bear markets.
At a glance, it’s easy to see how August has been anything but boring over the past few years. In fact, we didn’t see a break from the market madness until last year, which turned out to be an uncharacteristically quiet period for the major averages. The S&P 500 finished out August 2016 at breakeven as it consolidated late July’s sharp post-Brexit move. It was our first real taste of the summer doldrums in years.
Could we be in store for another tumultuous trading month this August? Anything’s possible. We saw additional weakness appear in the tech sector yesterday – yet earnings are coming in strong so far this week.
We’ll see how it all shakes out soon enough. Don’t sleep on August – it could turn into the most exciting trading month of the year…
Sincerely,
Greg Guenthner

Summary
– Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Facebook, and Amazon are now the five largest U.S. market capitalization equities.
– Collectively their performance in 2017, the past three years, and the past decade has been amazing.
– They have also absorbed a tremendous amount of capital, sucking it away from other opportunities, and their run may be ending.
“A 60:40 allocation to passive long-only equities and bonds has been a great proposition for the last 35 years … We are profoundly worried that this could be a risky allocation over the next 10.” — Sanford C. Bernstein & Company Analysts (January 2017)
“Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria” — Sir John Templeton
Life and investing are long ballgames.” — Julian Robertson
Introduction
For active, value-orientated investors, the current bull market in U.S. stocks, which began in March of 2009, has been one of the most difficult bull markets to navigate in history. Said another way, it has not been anything like a day at the beach.
Keeping up with the market, without owning the five biggest market capitalization stocks, which are all large-cap growth stocks and listed in order of size, Apple (AAPL), Alphabet (GOOGL), Microsoft (MSFT), Facebook (FB), and Amazon (AMZN), has been nearly impossible.
A strong performance by the largest stocks spurred investors, speculators, and fund managers to allocate to these equities in ever-greater quantities, creating a self-reinforcing circle of buying exacerbated by the continued inflows into passive index funds and ETF funds.
So what is an investor to do?
The answer is that it may finally be time to step outside the black hole that is consuming a disproportionate amount of investor’s capital. Simply avoiding shares of AAPL, which I was bullish on previously, GOOGL, MSFT, FB, and AMZN could be one-key to investment outperformance over the next decade.
Thesis
The largest companies have consumed investor capital at an ever-increasing pace, forcing more and more investment managers to become closet indexers, closing active investment strategies, and creating a bigger opportunity for the remaining active investors.
The Five Biggest Are the Primary Culprits
Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Facebook, and Amazon have had extraordinary performance in 2017. AAPL shares are up 30% year-to-date, GOOGL shares have gained 21%, MSFT shares are up 19% in 2017, FB shares lead the pack with a remarkable 50% year-to-date gain, and AMZN shares are up a strong 36% even after their minor stumble Friday.

Here at the Edelson Institute, we follow the war cycles very closely: Larry’s research shows that the cycles of war and conflict continue to ramp up. And that this escalation will not peak until the year 2020.
A huge part of the war cycles is cyber-warfare. And we are witnessing just the beginning.
Case-in-point: The lingering ransomware attack that began in Europe last Friday and continues hitting new targets in Japan and China this week.
The WannaCry software has locked thousands of computers in more than 150 countries. This ransomware attack, which hit 370,000 computers, stands far and away as the most severe malware attack so far in 2017.
The spread of this troubling ransomware is far from over. There are reports that link this attack to North Korea. If confirmed, it will add to the growing tensions between the U.S. and North Korea.
This is on top of other massive cyber-wars between countries, of which the Russian hacking of the U.S. elections is just the most recent in a firestorm of examples. We also see cyber-espionage by governments against each other and against their own people.
A disruptive cyber-attack on critical infrastructure in the United States (e.g., telecommunications, electrical power grids, gas and oil reserves, water supplies, financial institutions, and transportation and emergency services) would be extremely harmful … and costly.
In fact, Cybersecurity Ventures – which tracks and analyzes trends in cyber-misconduct – predicts the annual global costs of cyber-crime will balloon from $3 trillion in 2015 to $6 trillion by 2021.
You read that right: $6 trillion by 2021!
The $6 trillion includes the damage and destruction of data, plus stolen money and lost productivity. And don’t forget about the theft of intellectual property, personal and financial data, embezzlement, fraud, and post-attack disruption to the normal course of business … all of which adds up to huge sums of money to restore and replace.
That’s a staggering list of damages and a heck of an outlay of cash.
Bur, frankly, I’m not one bit surprised.
As the war cycles ramp up, cash-strapped, over-indebted nations are going to be forced to spend more money than ever on national security. And cyber-protection is just part of that equation.
We will continue to see the spread of cyber-espionage and the outright loss of liberty and privacy. Cyber-crimes and cyber-warfare might become the greatest threat to every person, place, and thing in the world.
But, it’s not all doom-and-gloom. For a savvy investor, there are plenty of ways to protect and grow your investments. Here’s how to play it …
As cyber-attacks become more common, the need for protection against them will skyrocket, driving up demand for cyber-security software.
That’s why, right now, I have my eyes on a number of companies in the cyber-security space, including: FireEye Inc. (FEYE), Fortinet Inc. (FTNT), and Symantec Corp. (SYMC). And if you don’t want to bet on an individual company, you can always go with an ETF, like PureFunds ISE Cyber Security (HACK) or First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity (CIBR).
Best wishes,
David Dutkewych
