Energy & Commodities
“It’s been very, very bad for our companies and for our workers, and we’re going to make some very big changes or we are going to get rid of NAFTA once and for all,” President Donald Trump said in a speech last week.
Today, White House readies order on withdrawing from NAFTA.
The Trump administration is considering an executive order on withdrawing the U.S. from NAFTA, according to two White House officials.
A draft order has been submitted for the final stages of review and could be unveiled late this week or early next week, the officials said. The effort, which still could change in the coming days as more officials weigh in, would indicate the administration’s intent to withdraw from the sweeping pact by triggering the timeline set forth in the deal.
Peter Navarro, the head of Trump’s National Trade Council, drafted the executive order in close cooperation with White House chief strategist Steve Bannon. The executive order was submitted this week to the staff secretary for the final stages of review, according to one of the White House officials.
The draft executive order could be a hardball negotiating tactic designed to bring Mexico and Canada to the table to renegotiate NAFTA. But once Trump sets the withdrawal process in motion, the prospects for the U.S. pulling out of one of the largest trade deals on the globe become very real.
Some internally see the drafting of the executive order as a win for the “nationalist” faction within the White House led by Bannon, who has been sidelined in recent weeks since he was removed from the National Security Council.
NAFTA Running Out of Time
CNNMoney reports Trump’s NAFTA is Already Running Out of Time
President Trump wants a new trade deal with Mexico and Canada soon. But he’s running out of time.
Trump has said he wants a deal that benefits US workers, but hasn’t said exactly what he wants in a new deal.
If Trump decides to stay in and renegotiate, time isn’t on his side.
His trade team, led by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, must trigger a 90-day consultation period before trade talks can begin. At the earliest, talks could start in August.
Edward Alden, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, said “it’s completely unrealistic” to get a deal done this year.
“The notion that you’re going to have a negotiation that’s both fast and productive is just an illusion,” Alden added.
It’s also worth noting that the original NAFTA agreement, which became law in 1994, took years to put together.
Mexican leaders want negotiations done by early 2018 because Mexico has presidential elections in July of next year. There’s no telling whether the next Mexican president will cooperate with Trump on NAFTA.
Very Bad Idea
Killing NAFTA is a terrible idea. I have talked about this before buts here are some pictures of the allegedly “terrible trade deal”
Manufacturing Employment
Trump and Navarro moan about NAFTA causing a loss of US manufacturing jobs. If anything, NAFTA stabilized or increased US manufacturing jobs for six or seven years thanks to an increase in bilateral trade.
The demise of US manufacturing jobs started in June of 1979, long before anyone could blame either Mexico or China.
US Balance of Trade in Goods with Mexico
Goods Trade with Mexico
It’s impossible to make a realistic case that NAFTA hurt the US.
Explaining Balance of Trade
The seeds of trade imbalances were sewn in 1971 when Nixon closed the gold window. The trade deficit rose, then skyrocketed.
Total Credit Market Debt Owed
Following Nixon closing the gold window on August 15, 1971, credit soared out of sight to the benefit of the banks, CEOs, the already wealthy, and the politically connected.
Scapegoating
- Trump blames Mexico and China.
- Larry Summers blames “Secular Stagnation”.
- Ben Bernanke blames a “Savings Glut”.
Scapegoating Mexico and China helped get Trump elected. Scapegoating also allows the Fed and central banks to blame anything and everything but lack of a gold standard.
“Our Currency but Your Problem”
The source of global trading imbalances, soaring debt, declining real wages, and the massive rise of the 1% at the expense of the bottom 90% is Nixon closing the gold window.
At that time, Nixon’s treasury secretary John Connally famously told a group of European finance ministers worried about the export of American inflation that the “dollar is our currency, but your problem.”
Balance of trade issues, soaring debt, declining real wages, and the demise of the US middle class are now our problem.
Before doing something stupid, Trump should take a look at this chart.
Ready, Willing, Able
So far, Trump has backed away, reversed positions, or failed in nearly everything he has tried to do or stood for in the election: Russia policy, Syria, getting Mexico to pay for a wall, and labeling China a currency manipulator are key examples.
Perhaps this is another negotiation ploy, but Trump fired a warning shot yesterday that he is ready, willing, and able to do something majorly stupid.
For details, please see Lumber Trade Idiocy: Trump Hits Canada with Proposed 20% Tariff on Lumber


Once again, the big man steps up to the plate.
Once again, he points his bat at the far bleachers.
This is going to be “bigger, I believe, than any tax cut in history.”
And once again, the fans go wild.
The Dow shot up 216 points yesterday as investors dreamed of a home run.
Corporate taxes would be reduced to 15%, it was rumored. Personal rates would go down to 33%, 25%, and 12% in three simple brackets.
And the economy would boom… just like it did when the last “biggest tax cut ever” was rolled out by the first Reagan administration.
Colorful Player
From the cheap seats to the skybox heavies, Mr. Trump always gets the fans excited.
He is a colorful player who gets his mug in the press regularly. He talks big. He swings hard. But he has a hard time connecting with the little ball.
In his first two times at bat since joining the major leagues, he has struck out.
The first time, the pitcher lobbed an easy O’care reform right over the plate. But with the fans cheering him on… and his whole team supposedly behind him… “The Donald” just couldn’t get on base.
Then there’s America’s foreign policy.
Yes, it was a confusing situation. “The Donald” had given sports lovers hope that he might bring a change. But the president saw a curve ball coming his way and… taking a page out of Hillary’s campaign promises… he couldn’t resist.
He swung wildly, sending a foul ball into the crowd, where it knocked out a hot-dog vendor.
“He had it coming,” the sports commentators agreed. “The hot dogs tasted terrible.”
Grand Slam
And now, Mr. Trump is up again.
This time, he’s promised a grand slam. Lower taxes. Higher stocks. More GDP growth.
Wow… if he can pull this off, we will eat every sour word we have written about the man. We will retract every criticism. We will withdraw every negative observation and sarcastic remark.
“No, Donald Trump is not a jackass,” we will declare… openly and with no tongue in either cheek.
“No, the president is not a scoundrel… not a brazen self-promoter… not a big-mouthed fool. We take it all back. We were mistaken. Our bad.”
But this declaration awaits its moment. And we suspect the moment is not now. Because there are reasons – both practical and structural – why real tax reform is extremely unlikely.
As we pointed out yesterday, real reform would mean dumping the present system. Not tinkering with it. Not switching winners and losers. Not cutting taxes in one place and replacing the revenue in others.
No, real reform would be dramatic. Bold. It would eliminate the loopholes, special favors, and crony giveaways.
It would cut tax collections, too; the feds don’t really need so much money to defend the country and operate the courts. Practically everything else they do is designed to reward the insiders.
And therein lies the reason why the tax system will not be fundamentally changed nor deeply cut…
If “The Donald” were to propose real reform, it would bring the whole Deep State down on his head with a ferocity never before seen in American politics.
Curious Amalgam
The tax is a curious amalgam – a blend of vote-buying… crony payoffs… subsidies… wishful thinking… social engineering… and outright corruption.
It is the bog in which the swamp critters slither.
Mr. Trump can fiddle with it – he can reward some cronies and punish others, for example. But he can’t deliver a genuinely big tax cut.
Tax revenues… and the curious way in which they are generated… are the Okefenokee of the Deep State system.
Eliminating all the juicy favors, insider plums, and Establishment subsidies is out of the question.
In a better world, the people would speak up. They would say, “We’re willing to spend 10% of our income on government, no more.”
Then their elected representatives would get out their knives. They’d check their tax revenues. And then they’d begin whittling away at their expenses until the two lined up.
The Pentagon’s “Teach Children to Waterboard” afterschool program might get the axe immediately.
“Whose idea was that?” they would ask each other, laughing.
Or maybe the DEA’s “Help Us Increase Drug Dealer Profit Margins” PR campaign would be scratched from the list.
Who knows? Maybe the “Subsidize Rich Kids’ Education” program… aka federal support for universities… might be trimmed back, too.
But that’s not going to happen.
Dull Knives
Each time the pols start to cut, their knife goes dull.
Every little whittle gets blunted by lobbyists, pressure groups, cronies, and campaign contributors.
Then the program is saved by the same principle that saves petty computer hackers.
An idiotic scheme might cost $1 billion… and could easily be eliminated. But the typical taxpayer says, “Why bother? It only costs me 5 cents.” It is not worth his while to think about it.
The politician who goes back to his district claiming to have eliminated $1 billion of spending in other districts might just as well claim to have swatted a fly. The voters won’t care.
He is much better off telling them that he brought a $1 boondoggle to his district. Every wasted dollar goes into someone’s pocket. And that someone will fight hard to keep it coming.
There is also a plain and immediate reason why a big tax cut is not possible: The feds already owe $20 trillion. Even with no cut to revenues, they’re on track for $30 trillion in 10 years.
A tax cut without corresponding cuts to spending (which aren’t going to happen) will just add more debt.
For now, there is no Republican majority that will pass a major tax cut. That will have to wait for a different moment.
When stocks crash and the economy goes into recession… it will be a whole new ballgame.
Then, in a moment of panic and desperation – whack… smack – “The Donald” may finally send the ball over the fence.
Then… spending even more money we don’t really have… on more things we don’t really need… whoopee!… we will go broke.
Regards,
Bill
Market Insight
BY CHRIS LOWE, EDITOR AT LARGE, BONNER & PARTNERS
Argentina isn’t all about cattle wrangling and ranching…
This year, the country’s stock market has been on an absolute tear.
This follows the election of pro-market and pro-business President Mauricio Macri at the end of 2015.
As you can see from today’s chart, the Merval Index (MAR), Argentina’s main stock market index, is up 25% in local currency terms.
![]() |
That compares with a gain of just 6% for the S&P 500.
— Chris Lowe

Having extensively previewed the various known and unknown aspects of Trump’s tax plan yesterday, set to be announced shortly, the reality – at least according to Bloomberg’s Mark Cudmore – is that no matter what Trump says today, it will almost certainly lead to more stock buying, leading to yet another “Trump Bump.” Which is ironic for one main reason: “Trump’s tax plan is expected to promise great things, but it’ll mean little without approval from Congress. So the consensus is that it’s unlikely to impact too much either way beyond some short-term volatility.” Furthermore, and counterintuitively, it would be a “positive surprise if the plan isn’t overly ambitious and doesn’t promise too much. That would make fiscal stimulus suddenly seem more achievable and realistic.”
However, Cudmore says that is an unlikely outcome: “One of the few inarguable facets of Trump is he knows how to get attention and viewers. Trump’s tax proposal is likely to be dramatic with some bold statements.”
also from ZeroHedge: French Establishment Mount The Ramparts Against Le Pen

In March 2017 Canada’s big city metro SFD prices coiled about or slid off their near term highs except in Toronto where detached houses, town houses and condos fetched new peak prices; Vancouver strata prices also hit new highs as well. Strata is the new Canadian “can-do” “must-do” “will-do” affordability metric.
Anyone owning a house in the scorching hot Toronto market is sitting on an unredeemed lottery ticket. In Vancouver scorched earth ruins are beginning to appear. In Calgary prices are labouring under the new Energy Sector 2.0 as the oil majors head for blacker fields; big money is fleeing Canada (and has been for nearly 20 years) and on the street, Calgary buyers are shunning strata units in favour of detached properties.
The Plunge-O-Meter is a fantasy model based simply on the current snapshot of how much of the correction has already occurred and if the rate of change continues at the same tempo.
