Timing & trends

The 3 Most Popular Articles Of The Week

down arrow1. New mortgage rule changes and what they mean for you

The Department of Finance threw a major wrench into the gears on Oct 3 by making huge material changes to the way that many borrowers get qualified. Here’s a rundown of what is changing and how it impacts you and the market

…read more HERE

2. Gold Off $100 … is it a Buy or Sell?

   by Michael Campbell & Mark Leibovit

Timer’s Digest’s Gold Market Timer Of the Year, Mark Liebovit called the latest correction but in this “what have you done for me lately world” Mike asks him what’s next – not just for gold but for Mark’s other big winner marijuana stocks.

…..continue reading HERE

3. Are we Being Prepared for World War III?

   by Martin Armstrong 

The polls are being rigged as they were in Britain for BREXIT. But plan B is clearly being put into play already preparing the public for the accusation that should Trump win, the election will be called a fraud because of Russian hackers

.….read more HERE

Solution to Low Interest Rates

yield sign

Arithmetic is beautiful, elegant, and stunningly objective. Sometimes the truth of our own arithmetic is unpleasant…but if you can accurately identify the core problem to be solved, then you can get to work on actually solving it.

So let’s start with some typical retirement Arithmetic. If you need $50,000 of pre-tax income from your portfolio, at a 3% yield you need $1.67 million. At a 5.5% return (including current income AND capital gains), you need $909,090. The difference is significant, and affects when you can retire, or how much you can receive in retirement income.

Are you just going to sit back and take this “yield abuse” dished out on mature investors by Central Banks who’ve helped drive down interest rates, or recognize the problem and get it solved? Let’s get to work.

Having been indoctrinated for decades about how “safe” top-rated government bonds are, we find ourselves at or very near historic low yields, with lots of risk to your principal if you’re investing in long-term government debt. It’s happened before, at least a couple times in your grandparents’ lifetime. http://awealthofcommonsense.com/2015/03/the-blueprint-for-a-bond-bear-market/   The problem is real, the results are serious, only the timing is unknown.

As Jim Dines says, “Over-efforting creates countervailing forces,” so don’t ignore volatility of market prices simply because an investment has a high yield. Focus on total return, with yield (interest and dividends) as part of the overall return, along with prudent capital gains.

Below is a compilation of strategies for dealing with the low interest rate environment from the IWM stable of discretionary portfolio managers…not specific recommendations for the reader. All portfolios are managed within the framework of an Investment Policy Statement (IPS), which is a best practice among Fiduciaries. “Process provides protection,” and here’s an intelligent process:

  • Step 1: Seek Higher Yielding Fixed Income alternatives to Government Bonds, with a focus on credit quality, including:
  1. Corporate Bonds, preferably under 5 years to maturity to be able to reinvest at higher rates in the future
  2. Preferred Shares with a guaranteed floor-rate reset provisions, ideally at rates 3% or more > 10 year govt. bond yields…and tax efficiency
  3. Commercial Mortgages, with Loan:Value ratios > 75%, and
  4. Structured Real Estate Trusts
  • Step 2: Consider “higher than traditional” allocations to High-Yielding Equities. The old rules about no more than 30 or 40% equities in retirement are outdated. Consider the following:
  1. Blue-Chips are boring and effective. Utilities and other sectors like telecoms and consumer staples with stable cash flows and great dividend coverage are a start
  2. High Yielding Corporate Bonds behave more like Equities, so an ETF helps diversify away individual credit risk but not sector risk. HYG, JNK and XCB are a few well-known options that can fit the bill, but see notes on timing and currency below
  3. Alternatives like structured Asset-based Lending and Factoring pools yielding 6 to 8%
  • Step 3: Dynamic Strategies. Markets are fluid and dynamic, and management of your portfolio should be as well:
  1. Writing Covered Calls on your blue-chip equities to add 1 or 2% to your current yield
  2. Active Currency management, sometimes to grow but most importantly to protect
  3. Buy volatile assets like stocks and high-yielding corporate during pullbacks, not just because you have cash
  4. Think of cash as a tactical asset class, not a strategic one, unless you’re already drawing income during retirement
  5. Lock in gains with a disciplined risk management framework. Be one of the strong hands who are selling to the late-comer weak hands when valuations are stretched. You never go broke by taking a profit, and great assets can be bought back later at lower prices.

Increasing the yield within your portfolio almost always decreases its volatility, and the less volatile your portfolio is, the less likely you are to do something that is financially destructive like selling volatile assets near panic lows.

And remember, everything included in your Investment Plan should be consistent with the Life Goals ™ expressed in your Wealth Management Plan.

Andrew H. Ruhland, CFP, CIM

Founder and President, Integrated Wealth Management Inc. in Calgary

Gold Stocks Corrections in Bull Markets

The gold stocks are clearly in correction mode. The large caps (HUI, GDX) have corrected 30% while the juniors (GDXJ) have held up well in comparison by correcting the same amount. Given a number of factors (the size of the previous advance, the recent technical damage, stronger US$ index and rising yields) the gold stocks should continue to correct and consolidate in a larger sense. To gauge a potential path forward we present a new analog chart and compare the current correction to those from past markets.

The chart below plots the current correction in the HUI index in comparison to the corrections in 2001, 2002 and 2006. Each correction followed very strong advances. The 2001 and 2002 periods are the best comparison to today. The recent rebound originated from a potential secular low (like 2001) and lasted six to seven months (like 2001). However, the rebound was much stronger than in 2001 and reached an extreme overbought point (like 2002). The HUI has already corrected 31%, which is much closer to the 2002 correction. Only time will tell how long the correction lasts but my view is it is more likely to last around six months than the 10 months seen in 2002. 

Oct132016HUIcorrections

Gold Stocks Correction Analog

The other important point to mention is every correction formed a typical A-B-C or down-up-down pattern. In other words, each correction served investors two buying opportunities (and three in the case of 2002). While we are likely at a short-term buying opportunity now, probability tells us that another one is coming in the next several months.

A variety of technical indicators (various moving averages, pivot points, Fibonacci retracements) gave us downside targets of GDX $22 and GDXJ $34-$35. That degree of downside is inline with the correction analog chart. While it may take another week for the sector to find a short-term low, the outlook over the next several weeks appears positive. Continue to accumulate on weakness and don’t be afraid to exercise some patience as more buying opportunities will be ahead. 

Jordan Roy-Byrne, CMT, MFTA

Jordan@TheDailyGold.com

…related:

How Could Helicopter Money Affect the Gold Market?

How Does the U.S. Stock Market Perform in Election Years?

09203467-f713-4ebf-9b89-962f02e84f15

In just a few weeks time, the ballots will be in for one of the most controversial elections in U.S. history. Whether the tally ends in a Clinton or Trump presidency, it’s difficult to know the potential range of implications that the 2016 election will have on markets. 

In the mean time, investors are wondering how to best position themselves. How could the election possibly affect their portfolio, and how can they hedge against tail risks?

MARKET PERFORMANCE IN ELECTION YEARS

The good news for investors is that historically, the market has performed well in election years with the S&P 500 ending up in positive territory 82% of the time.

The bad news? This is clearly not a normal election.

The following infographic uses data from Fisher Investments to show how the S&P 500 historically performs during U.S. election years, as well as during the terms of specific presidents.

Screen Shot 2016-10-14 at 7.18.56 AM

Screen Shot 2016-10-14 at 7.19.36 AM

Screen Shot 2016-10-14 at 7.20.03 AM

Screen Shot 2016-10-14 at 7.20.49 AM

Screen Shot 2016-10-14 at 7.21.22 AM

Screen Shot 2016-10-14 at 7.22.45 AM

 

Four Companies for the Metals Market Turnaround

The bear market was tough. Lots of companies went into complete hibernation; lots of people left the sector. It takes time for companies to get going again, but they have begun to get back on their feet, says Gwen Preston, founder of Resource Maven. She discusses some of the major trends she sees in the mining industry, and profiles several companies that survived the lean years and could lead the pack going forward.

ICG10-13-16image

Majors Are on the Hunt
Majors, after selling almost everything to survive the bear market, need to start restocking the pipeline again. Usually that process starts with new production and near-development stories, but there just aren’t very many such assets around. The bear market derailed so many projects that only a small number are ready to be built or are newly operational. Majors are circling these opportunities but, because they know competition will be stiff, they are also going straight to exploration-stage opportunities.

However, don’t expect a wave of M&A. Instead, I think we are going to see a wave of partnerships—joint ventures and equity investments that give the major a foot in the door with assets they like. And while such deals aren’t as exciting for the market as takeouts, they are important because they make it possible for juniors to advance their projects quickly and to focus on exploration instead of where and how to find capital.

Optionality Offers Leverage, but Little More
Optionality plays have done very well in gold’s run to date. Investors have piled into the idea of leveraging gold via a portfolio of projects with significant ounces in the ground. That leverage will remain. And leverage to a rising price is win enough for many. However, if a win for you means a takeout or a construction decision, optionality isn’t the right game.

This time around, majors are not interested in size. They want value. Goldcorp did not buy Kaminak because a mine at Coffee would impact its production profile significantly; it bought it because Coffee will be an economically robust mine that will help Goldcorp’s bottom line.

Value accretive assets are the name of today’s game. That means things like infrastructure, metallurgy, social license, design complexity, and costs really matter. Large deposits with challenges in these areas are not of interest. They may yet come back into vogue, but if they do it will not be for a while. Majors destroyed so much capital buying for size without focusing on practical value in the last cycle that the focus on value accretive assets will stick around for quite a while.

Juniors Are Gaining Confidence
Juniors are gaining confidence that capital is available. It has taken time for that confidence to establish, which is why so many juniors initially planned only small drill programs this year–they were still in full capital conservation mode. Now they see oversubscribed financings left and right, backing everything from advanced assets to grassroots exploration and from the revival of old projects to new discoveries.

The confidence means drill programs are being expanded, new targets are being tested, and new partnerships or acquisitions are being inked. Most moves are still small relative to the exploration programs or deals we see when things are hot, but they are a heck of a lot bigger than they were six months ago, let alone a year ago.

Those Active Now Will Win Later
The bear market was tough. Lots of companies went into complete hibernation; lots of people left the sector. It takes time for companies to get going again from standstill and for people to insert themselves back into the sector. That’s OK; it’s part of the process. But the companies and people who stayed alive through it are leading the pack today.

Companies that stayed alive are reaping the rewards of their bear market efforts. The efforts were often directed at tasks that could be accomplished, like advancing engineering or metallurgy or permitting or social license. Not sexy stuff—but when the market is so turned off that stocks fall on hot drill results, it makes sense to focus on the boring.

Below are a few of the companies that can benefit from these trends.

Integra Gold Corp. (ICG:TSX.V; ICGQF:OTCQX) is working toward the release of a prefeasibility study, but don’t be misled: this is a development-stage gold company.

Screen Shot 2016-10-14 at 6.50.05 AMThe adit that is being driven underground for exploration purposes for now is sized for production. The mill is almost ready to go; having a mill already built cuts the capital to turn this project into a mine probably in half.

Tight drilling is almost completed to upgrade the upper first-mined part of the deposit to reserve status. The brownfield nature of the property also means there is little permitting needed and the hoops that do need to be jumped through are straightforward and unlikely to cause problems. Plus, Lamaque is adjacent to the town of Val d’Or. This is Canadian mining central, a city named after gold and in need of a new major mine to provide employment.

Integra’s team has all the experience needed to start mining at Lamaque; it mixes together engineers and miners who have mined in the Val d’Or area for years with capital markets operators who can raise capital and tell the story.

Integra is one of few Canadian gold projects that could be taken to production this cycle, for a reasonable cost and with lots of exploration upside. Integra could do it alone or get taken out.

Also on the radar is Maritime Resources Corp. (MAE:TSX.V), which is closing in on upgrading from an exploration story to a development company. The prefeasibility study for the Hammertown gold mine in Newfoundland should be out within a few weeks.

Once Doug Fulcher and his team have that document in hand, they will start working to source capital to build the operation.

The build will not be expensive, as they are not building a mill—ore will be processed at the Nugget Pond mill 140 km away. Including milling and trucking costs, the operation should still generate a very nice return, perhaps as high as a 70% IRR.

The East Coast of Canada is attracting a lot of attention these days as a good gold district that is supportive of mine development. Maritime is well positioned in terms of its project, location, and stage.

The next company, TerraX Minerals Inc. (TXR:TSX.V), recently released assay results for the first four holes of its 27,000-metre drill program. The four holes tested Mispickel, which is the northernmost target in the 10km by 4km Target Area that is TerraX’s area of focus at the large Yellowknife City project. The Target Area covers a flexure of the regional Yellowknife shear zone; such flexures create the kinds of openings that can host gold.

Screen Shot 2016-10-14 at 6.50.17 AMMost of the targets TerraX has focused on to date lie along the west side of the Target Area, including Crestaurum, Barney, Brent-Hebert, and Shear 20. The work there has generated good results but, to ensure all significant targets saw initial testing before any one got the lion’s share of exploration attention, of late TerraX shifted to two targets on the east side, called Sam Otto and Mispickel.

The first holes into Mispickel last winter returned some nice hits. Those hits lined up, delineating a vertical shear zone of mineralization. Lower-grade hits also suggested the presence of mineralization in a hangingwall zone and a footwall zone.

So to kick off the summer program TerraX returned to Mispickel and tested below those summer hits. Results included 29.9 g/t gold over 5.5 metres, 22.4 g/t gold over 3 metres, and 12.5 g/t gold over 5.9 metres.

So far Mispickel is showing good consistency of mineralization and structure. Two drills continue to test the zone. One is doing work like the holes just reported: testing known zones down dip and along strike. The other is drilling aggressive stepout holes along the interpreted trend. If both efforts return gold, Mispickel will have quickly shown itself to be a high-grade gold system with scale.

Our final company is in uranium, which is out of favor right now, but NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE:TSX; NXGEF:OTCQX) has been busy laying the groundwork for the metal’s turnaround.

Screen Shot 2016-10-14 at 6.50.33 AMThe company’s Arrow deposit is one of the best mineral discoveries of the decade, regardless of commodity. Arrow is big, it is high grade, it is mineable, and it is in a good jurisdiction. Arrow will become a mine one day.

NexGen’s outperformance over the last year despite uranium’s continuing deep bear market proves these points.

The uranium bear market continues. The spot price is near an 11-year low. This trend will reverse—the world will run into a uranium shortage in 2019 or 2020—but the turnaround clearly hasn’t started yet.

When it does, NexGen will rocket. It’s possible that Cameco will buy it before then. Either way, this stock will do well in the long run, and anyone who believes that a uranium bull market is in the cards should have exposure.

Until then, the stock will probably just hold ground. That’s somewhat crazy, given that NexGen announces incredibly high-grade drill results every month and is now showing that Arrow probably isn’t the only deposit on its property, but that’s what will be given the uranium sector and the fact that the next big thing for NexGen—an updated resource estimate—is not due out for almost half a year.

With almost a decade of junior resource-focused journalism under her belt, Gwen Preston launched Resource Maven. Preston watches the wires, talks to her network and analyzes economics to identify resource news that matters and figure out how to profit. She focuses on early-stage exploration and development stories. Preston has been interviewed on CBC and in the Financial Post.

Related Articles

 

Want to read more Gold Report articles like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see recent articles and interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviewspage.

 

Disclosure:
1) The following companies mentioned in the article are sponsors of Streetwise Reports: Integra Gold Inc., TerraX Minerals Inc. and NexGen Energy Ltd. The companies mentioned in this article were not involved in any aspect of the article preparation. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
2) Gwen Preston: I, or members of my immediate household or family, own shares of the following companies mentioned in this article: Integra, Maritime, TerraX, NexGen. I personally am, or members of my immediate household or family are, paid by the following companies mentioned in this article: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this article: None. I determined which companies would be included in this article based on my research and understanding of the sector.
3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article.
4) Patrice Fusillo assisted with the compilation of this article for Streetwise Reports LLC and provides services to Streetwise Reports as an employee. She owns, or her family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
5) This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.br /> 6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise during the up-to-four-week interval from the time of the interview until after it publishes.