Gold & Precious Metals

This article looks at factors that will affect gold and silver prices as we go forward. We have to say they are considerable and will lead to our conclusion that while the gold price has fallen through support below $1,300 and now stand at $1,250, we see the fundamentals taking the price back higher and much higher over time. Indeed we do see it rising through its all time peak in the next year and beyond. We will also highlight the fact that such a rise will occur in all currencies as they weaken against the gold price.

This article takes from previous articles featured in the Gold Forecaster weekly issues www.GoldForecaster.com  or www.SilverForecaster.com

Gold price structure
Not the balance of demand & supply

Few people realize the structure that lies behind the gold price. Most people believe that it reflects the balance of supply and demand. This is based on the belief that up to 95% of supply and demand is matched by buyer and seller in a ‘normal’, with the un-contracted, unforeseen, final 5% [described as the marginal supply] taken to market in search of buyers, by producers. Likewise buyers have normally contracted 95% of their needs direct from refiners or miners. But the final 5% is bought or sold in the market place when the unexpected need arises.

The market that defines the gold price should be made up of marginal suppliers and buyers. Or is that all? No! Speculators and investors turn to this open market in droves. They are the ones that change the game and stop the market being simply unexpected demand and supply. In most simpler markets speculators and investors make up a far smaller percentage than they do in the very different gold market.

Investors in gold come to the market because;

  1. The price is going to rise or fall and they want to make a profit longer-term.
  2. They believe gold is money and buy it to hold for the long term, because of their increasing doubts about the value of national currencies against gold, which is in competition with paper currencies as a store of value. Bear in mind that gold has been such for thousands of years, whereas currencies have only been independent of gold as a back-up since 1971.

Speculators come to the physical gold market usually because they want to hold the metal for a short term profit or sell the metal to buy it back lower down [for profit again]. They are often driven by factors outside the gold market, such as changes in exchange rates in various currencies, or changes and expectations in economic factors, such as interest rate movements, on a global basis. They have little interest in the forces underlying gold any more than they have in any other commodity. Profit in the short term is their goal, and if the gold market or any other market can supply that profit, there they will go.

COMEX

COMEX is not simply a commodity exchange. It is a financial market. The COMEX gold market is not a physical gold market. It is a place where one makes financial bets for cash on contracts, either futures or options.

The only time it becomes a physical gold market is when notice is given by a buyer or seller at the start of a contract that delivery is required or supply will happen at the end of the contract. If no such notice is given then any loss or profit at the end of the contract is paid in cash only. This protects all buyers and sellers and the exchange against having to deliver physical gold.

Remarkably, the physical market is heavily influenced by COMEX and somehow, adjusts prices in line with COMEX. It shouldn’t happen unless there is a link between the use of the physical market with the COMEX ‘financial’ market. This does happen when the banks operate in both markets using them in conjunction to drive prices, causing other investors to react to their actions.

For example, speculators [high frequency traders included] will take short or long positions on COMEX then enter the physical market [in London usually] to deal in physical OTC in such a way as to make their COMEX positions profitable. If they are short [as we saw on last Tuesday] they sell enough gold to depress the price. On quiet days, such as when the Chinese market was closed last week, it was a good time to sell using both markets [when  buyers, in size, were absent] to manufacture short-term profits.

We also saw major operations like that in 2013 when COMEX short positions were taken in huge amounts then massive amounts of physical gold [400 tonnes+] was dumped in the physical market. This triggered stop losses and brought another 600+ extra tonnes onto the market from investors reacting to price falls. This sent the physical market plunging nearly a third to hit $1,150. What a profitable operation for the big U.S. banks! Of course the positions can be both ways, where ever the speculators want the price to go.

Since 2013 this has held prices at low levels. During this time China and Russia have been able to acquire huge tonnages for their central banks for and through the Shanghai Gold Exchange.

But it has also served to keep gold prices low and prevent them competing with currencies as an alternative to currencies. Prices north of $2,000 would represent competition to the dollar and other currencies and reflect a loss of confidence in them.

Sum Total

Take the above shape of the market and add all these ingredients together and what do we have?

  1. Net demand and supply do not affect the gold price that much. Where marginal supply and demand comes to the market their influence should rule prices if the market was isolated to them.
  2. Speculators in the physical markets can overwhelm this marginal supply and demand. It comes usually from the big banks and their clients who focus on short term profit.
  3. COMEX paper gold is really froth or surf on the real waves in the market, but somehow this being full of sound and fury is credited with controlling gold prices. This can only happen when major banks and central banks use both London and COMEX to rule prices.
  4. In the last few years China has taken huge amounts of physical gold to itself and now Shanghai is the global, physical, gold hub. Once it has liberalized its currency and financial markets, we believe it will control the pricing power over gold. It’s inevitable. This will undermine the power of COMEX as physical dealing in both London and New York will see the presence of Chinese demand and supply in its markets. Being far larger than either, the Chinese will overwhelm the western gold market. With the Chinese bank ICBC/Standard a gold market maker in London controlling warehousing for around 3,500 tonnes there, they can buy/sell large amounts to ensure the global price of gold is at levels they want to see!

Monetary Influence

The absolute proof of the value of gold as money is the fact that central banks continue to be the major holders of gold. It is held as an important reserve asset and acts as a counter to national currencies in reserves.

Only once gold had been sidelined in the U.S. during the 41 years to 1974 could the dollar act as the only currency in the country. Over the generations since 1933, the globe got used to the dollar as the only global money. Eventually, after a considerable campaign against gold from 1975 until 2009 by western central banks and the I.M.F. was gold recognized as a valuable reserve asset. From 1999 until 2009 the Central Bank Gold Agreement stated exactly that.

But the reality is that central banks have never discarded gold as back-up money as is evidenced by the huge tonnages that continue in their reserves.

Indeed, an ex-head of the Bundesbank, Weber, stated that gold is ‘a counter to the gold price’.

Gold is not measured by currency values, gold measures currency values.

We have often written about the dollar succeeded when it became the sole global reserve currency, with the backing of oil [when one could only buy oil using the U.S. Dollar] but that time has begun to wane as a host of nations from European to Russian to Chinese currencies are now chipping away at the dollar’s influence.

De-globalization and Exchange/Capital Controls

Exchange and Capital Controls are often misread as being confined to emergency protection of a currency. They have wider uses and can be used to interfere with specific flows of funds and to control national commercial situations. They include, withholding taxes, duties both imports and exports in specific instances as well as overall financial flows through a country.

They can be extremely effective in boosting a nation’s economy.

Oil and the Dollar

Here is a potential scene that may happen for political as well as economic reasons. A threat is being posed by divisions between Saudi Arabia and the U.S. as the U.S. policy in the Middle East still does not accept that the battle is between Shi’ite and Sunni Muslims not individual nations.

On top of this it is clear that increasing U.S. oil supplies through fracking as well as other sources may well obviate the need for imported oil. As we see Russia and Saudi Arabia appearing to cooperate on freezing or reducing the price of oil, we see not only the price of oil, but the future of fracking lying directly under the control of these two nations. The future will likely see the oil price ‘war’ heat up tremendously to the extent that the U.S. may well want to protect its own oil industry, as well as ensuring it becomes self-sufficient in oil supply. The imposition of duties on imported oil will protect the future profitability of U.S. oil producers [through higher prices] as well as remove the control of U.S. oil prices from outside producers such as Russia and Saudi Arabia. This will also remove the need to guarantee the security of the Persian Gulf.

The boost to inflation through higher prices will also assist in the economic growth levels of the U.S.A.

In turn the lessening of the need for imported [Saudi] oil may well lead Saudi Arabia to accept all currencies for its oil, removing the hold the dollar has had for generations over the oil world.

Once this happens the dollar will remain a leading global currency but lose its role as the sole global reserve currency, while preparing it for its future role in a multi-currency monetary system, whose arrival is inevitable.

The rise of the Middle Kingdom

With the arrival of the Yuan as one of the currencies that make up the Special Drawing Right of the I.M.F. the Yuan has become a global ‘hard’ currency. Its use from now on will accelerate globally, taking from the role the dollar has played until now.

We have no doubt that China will be the largest economy in the world and the wealthiest simply through its population and capabilities. It will be the manufacturer to the world. It will have the financial power to dominate the global economy. Alongside this the Yuan will challenge the dollar to the point that there will be a distinct division of east and west in the global economy.

As an example, imagine China becoming willing to pay Yuan for all imports and demanding Yuan for its exports. Of course, this won’t happen quickly, but gradually so as to minimize any progress in China’s global power.

But at some point there will be international friction in the monetary world. This will lead to currency turmoil and a loss of confidence in most currencies.

Gold in a multi-currency world

Only gold will bring the soothing qualities to the monetary world needed to make it function properly while major changes take place.

As we have written many times before gold will become the fulcrum [or the lubricant] on which the currency world continues to function well. That’s why central banks continue to hold gold in the west and to acquire it in the east!

Looking at the big picture of gold we see the investment/speculative role of gold and the monetary world of gold. As we move to a multi-currency monetary system we see the two sides of the gold world rushing on a headlong path towards a major collision. But, at the moment, they are apart.

Once they collide we will see a rocketing gold price.

At that point nation after nation will see the need for governments to control gold itself and the price just as the U.S. did in 1933. But this time, gold will continue to be dealt freely outside nations that take their citizen’s gold.

At that point nation’s opposition to gold, competing with their currencies, will go the way the U.S. did in the past and harness gold in support of their currencies. But then they will not allow gold to compete against their currencies at institutional or retail levels within their borders. They will ban gold dealing and will appropriate gold within their jurisdictions preventing citizens from holding all but small amounts of gold.

With nations whose currencies are losing the confidence of their trading partners, the use of gold as a back-up asset to repair that confidence will grow. We saw that in the Sovereign Debt crisis in the E.U. gold/currency swaps ‘policed’ by the Bank of International Settlements, which blazed the trail for what we expect to see in the future.

A word to gold investors – Simply holding gold overseas will not be enough. We are happy to send you a guide on just how to hold your gold effectively out of the reach of the authorities in your Jurisdiction.

It will be the gold investor that ensures he is outside the reach of confiscating authorities that will retain his gold and ensure he profits from those rocketing prices.

….related:

Gold: Deflation Ends and Inflation Begins

Stock Trading Alert: Negative Expectations Following Tuesday’s Decline – New Downtrend Or Just Consolidation?

Briefly: In our opinion, speculative short positions are favored (with stop-loss at 2,210, and profit target at 2,050, S&P 500 index).

Our intraday outlook is bearish, and our short-term outlook is bearish. Our medium-term outlook is neutral, following S&P 500 index breakout above last year’s all-time high:

Intraday outlook (next 24 hours): bearish
Short-term outlook (next 1-2 weeks): bearish
Medium-term outlook (next 1-3 months): neutral
Long-term outlook (next year): neutral

The main U.S. stock market indexes were mixed between -0.1% and +0.1% on Wednesday, as investors hesitated following Tuesday’s decline. The S&P 500 index is the lowest since half of September. Is this a new downtrend or just more consolidation following June – July rally? The nearest important level of resistance is at around 2,140-2,150, marked by previous support level. The next resistance level is at 2,170, among others. On the other hand, support level is at around 2,120, marked by September local low. The market trades along medium-term upward trend line, as the daily chart shows:

1
Larger Image

Expectations before the opening of today’s trading session are negative, with index futures currently down 0.5-0.6%. The European stock market indexes have lost 0.7-1.3% so far. Investors will now wait for the Initial Claims number release at 8:30 a.m. The S&P 500 futures contract trades within an intraday downtrend, as it extends its recent move down. The nearest important level of support is at around 2,100-2,110. On the other hand, resistance level remains at 2,130-2,140, marked by short-term consolidation, as we can see on the 15-minute chart:

S&P500 15-Minute Chart
Larger Image

The technology Nasdaq 100 futures contract follows a similar path, as it extends its recent sell-off. The nearest important level of resistance is at around 4,800-4,820, marked by previous support level. On the other hand, support level is at 4,750-4,770, marked by some previous consolidation.

NASDAQ100 Futures 15-Minute Chart
Larger Image

Concluding, the broad stock market fluctuated yesterday, following its recent decline. For now, it looks like a flat correction within a short-term downtrend. Therefore, we continue to maintain our speculative short position (opened on July 18th at 2,162, S&P 500 index). Stop-loss level is at 2,210 and potential profit target is at 2,050 (S&P 500 index). You can trade S&P 500 index using futures contracts (S&P 500 futures contract – SP, E-mini S&P 500 futures contract – ES) or an ETF like the SPDR S&P 500 ETF – SPY. It is always important to set some exit price level in case some events cause the price to move in the unlikely direction. Having safety measures in place helps limit potential losses while letting the gains grow.

Thank you.

….also:

Wall Street Earnings Recession is No Cause for Worry; Stock Market Bull has Been Ignoring It

Plan for tomorrow but live for today

broken piggy

I hope everyone enjoyed their Thanksgiving weekend. My weekend began by attending a memorial service for my wife’s friend who passed away from MS. It was a bit controversial as she was one of the first 200 pioneers of assisted suicide in Canada. She was only 60 years old and spent most of her adult life dedicated to raising a large family, and spending countless hours volunteering in our community. She will be greatly missed with the ripple effect far reaching.

Attending the service over the weekend reminded me once again, of the importance of planning for tomorrow but living for today. I turned 50 in June and am faced with the realization that I’m closer to 60 than I am 40. I don’t feel 50 but the fact is, I am. I have my health however, I know I’m not alone when it comes to financial planning and wondering what is enough? Is the 80% of income for retirement still relevant? Do I plan on living a long life rather than just existing at the end?

I am always interested in reading the most current financial articles that discuss the balance between living for today, but planning for tomorrow. I especially appreciated reading the weekend newspaper articles (October 8, 2016 National Post and Globe & Mail) about Canadians my age assessing their retirement readiness with financial planners. One publication discussed how to invest $700,000 while the other discussed the merits of robo advisors. The financial advisor recommended a 2% return of $14,000 after fees and taxes on $700,000. This approach makes absolutely no sense. To risk the volatility of the stock market for 2%? Why not leave your money under a mattress and pull $14,000 a year for the next 50 years without any risk?

With those options, no wonder the odds are stacked against the average investor. To add insult to injury, Portfolio Manager Martin Pelletier, of Trivest Wealth Counsel Ltd. was quoted in the Financial Post on September 27th saying that people should not invest in private equity investments, unless they have a minimum of $10 million of financial assets. So it’s ok for institutional and pension funds to invest but not the average investor?

We can offer a third option. It’s called genuine diversification that includes alternative and private equity investments into your financial portfolio. It forms a vital plan that can pay more than 2% but doesn’t expose the entire portfolio to ruin. That percentage is based on your suitability for risk and time horizon when you need your money back. The best news is you don’t have to have $10 million in the bank to invest, not even close in fact.

At TriView Capital, we want to help you if you think that your current investment strategy isn’t working. For as little as $5,000, you can invest in private equity through an OM (Offering Memorandum) with other eligible investors. As of 2016, Securities Regulators across Canada have imposed that new OMs must have audited financials which should help add greater transparency and accountability for investors. There are risks and it’s our job to take you through the pros and cons of alternative investing. Best of all, many can be added into your registered accounts.

Ahead of the 2017 World Outlook Conference, we will start highlighting these “8 ways to 8%” annual yields through MoneyTalks and our current investors. Please visit our website at www.triviewcapital.com as we start the process of showing you strategies towards “8 ways to 8%”.

craig burrows oct 2016

 

Craig S Burrows ICD.D

cburrows@triviewcapital.com

www.triviewcapital.com

Is The Fed Delaying The Day Of Reckoning?

There Is No Economic Recovery!

The FED and the Corporate World understand that there is NO economic recovery. They need to keep feeding this ‘bull market’ with plenty of accommodative easing or this ‘bull’ will die. The FED will do whatever it takes to maintain this by cutting rates to near zero and below so asto spruce up the economy. However, these conventional policies that are being applied, by the FED, will not work seeing as the ‘deflationary forces’ have gained momentum. Global economies cannot sustain rate hikes. They will continue to use ‘expansionary monetary policy’, indefinitely: (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-fed-chief-yellen-114816250.html).

The FED will no longer remain the ‘lone wolf’ Central Bank of and by keeping interest rates from going negative. The New Zealand Central Bank went through this same cycle, last year, at which time the economy could not sustain a rate hike, thus resulting in a quick cycle of rate cuts.

The ‘herd mentality’ is now at the stage where they must accept this as the ‘new norm’. They want to keep this illusion alive and do not want to deal with the reality.

When the FED does implement negative interest rates, the stock markets are going to soar so high that it will probably even shock the ‘bulls’. Thus, this is the reasoning that the market will not currently crash, but will experience sharp corrections. In this current market environment, I now recommend putting your money into precious metals.

This is one of the most detested ‘bull markets’ in history. The FED has provided this market with the ingredients that it needs to take it to the ‘bubble level’. The masses will embrace this market in the same manner as the corporate world has done so for the past eight years.

The main trigger for the financial crisis of 2008 was the issuance of mortgages that did not require down payments. The ease at which one could get mortgages, in the past, is what drove housing prices into unsustainable levels.

Currently, Barclays has launched the “Family Springboard Mortgage” which allows homebuyers the opportunity to purchase a property with a mere 5% deposit.  In order to acquire this 5% deal, one will need guarantors to put up the cash, which, in turn, will be lost if one fails to repay the mortgage.

Ones’ family/guarantor must place savings which are equal to 10% of the purchase price into a Barclays Helpful Start savings account. No withdrawals are allowed for three years. The Helpful Start savings account pays the Bank of England’s’ base rate plus 1.5%, which currently means getting 2% interest, before taxes. This is not a lot of interest considering the lengthy period of time: (http://www.barclays.co.uk/mortgages/family-springboard-mortgage).

When the FED starts purchasing private assets, this will negatively impact economic growth and consumers’ well-being. This reasoning is that the FED will use this power to keep failing companies alive and thus preventing the companies’ assets from being used to produce goods or services which are more highly valued by consumers.

The Reality:

Over 50% of Americans do not have enough money to invest in stocks. The U.S., unfortunately, is currently appearing to be closer to that of a third world nation. Americans appear to be living hand to mouth thus making it more and more difficult for the average person to focus on his/her financial security. One in every seven Americans currently depend on food stamps in addition to using Food Banks, despite this ‘so-called economic recovery’.

The chart below from Banktrate.com illustrates that a total of 74% of individuals either do not have enough money to invest in the stock market or they do not know anything about stocks.

42749

Random tests have already shown that the monkeys with darts fare better than most of these experts would.

The severe economic contractions which I have been speaking of, over the last couple of years, should now be evident to all of us, today. Productivity has now fallen to a negative rate. Investment has stalled and individuals have turned against globalization. Without productivity growth, capitalism becomes unpopular, globalization becomes unpopular and politicians, in turn, become unpopular.

Conclusion:

Gold and silver should be viewed as a form of insurance against the impending future financial disaster. We will also experience another disaster, sooner or later. I am not advocating that you should load up on bullion seeing as the precious metals sector has put in a bottom. I am referring to one obtaining insurance against another financial crisis that has the potential to be larger than the 2008 financial crisis was.

Every crisis also brings with it an opportunity, hence, one should make the best use of this opportunity before the price of gold and silver jump and value. It is better to invest now and see one’s investments multiply rather than waiting for the crisis to commence and pay a premium for insurance later.

Are we Being Prepared for World War III?

Hillary-Barking-1024x572The choice for president has never been so bad. The latest polls show 63% of voters said Clinton is overly secretive, 55% said she was corrupt, and 52% said she was “extremely liberal.” This is very interesting since the only presidents since 1900 to be elected with greater than 60% of the popular vote were Lyndon Johnson in 1964  after the Kennedy Assassination,  61.05%,  Franklin Roosevelt in 1936 with 60.80%, Richard Nixon in 1972 with 60.67%, and Warren Harding in 1920 with 60.32%. Therefore, Hillary beats everyone with the highest rating of distrust.

The polls are being rigged as they were in Britain for BREXIT. But plan B is clearly being put into play already preparing the public for the accusation that should Trump win, the election will be called a fraud because of Russian hackers. The Washington Post, a big Democratic Party mouth piece, ran the story that Russian Hacker-1hackers target the Arizona primary. CNBC is carrying the story that Russia will hack the elections. Obama has outright accused Russia of targeting the Democratic National Party (DNC) claiming two Russian hackers were discovered. This is the story being carried even by the BBC, yet the specialist called in was Shawn Henry, the chief security officer at company called in Crowdstrike, who is himself a former executive assistant director of the FBI.  It was even bantered about in the second debate between Hillary and Trump. The New York Times is jumping in also carrying the story. Reuters is now reporting that there is no question that Russia was behind the hacker at the DNC.

Democrats are now warning foreign governments and hackers that cyber attacks against the U.S. will be treated like any other, even if it leads to war. DNS hijacking or DNS redirection is a common practice. This amounts to subverting the resolution of Domain Name System (DNS) queries. This can be achieved by malware that overrides a computer’s TCP/IP configuration to point at a rogue DNS server under the control of an attacker. It can even modify the behavior of a trusted DNS server so that it does not comply with internet standards. However, the hardest problem in finding the source of these attacks is really attribution. Each data packet sent over the Internet contains information about its source and its destination. Yet the source field can be changed [spoofed] by an attacker to make it appear as if  it is coming from someplace it’s not. This is standard operational procedure. Consequently, I serious doubt that a professional hacker would have left a trace.

I cannot stress strong enough that there is no way they will allow Trump to enter the White House. It appears that should he win, like BREXIT against the odds and the polls, Obama will not leave and the election will be declared a fraud. Obama will most likely step down and hand it to Joe Biden. Out models are showing November as a rather important turning point and this seems unusual insofar as that it would be limited to merely an election. Something else may be in the wind.

….related from Martin: The Urgency of The Issues