Timing & trends

Buckle Up – “Margin Debt: To The Moon”

Signs Of The Times

 

“The End of Snow?”

                               – The New York Times Sunday Review, February 7

“Over Two Thirds of Contiguous USA Covered With Snow”

                                                                                          – WUWT, February 7

“1 in 4 Americans Unaware That Earth Revolves Around The Sun”

– Survey of 2,200 by the National Science Foundation, February 14

(It is uncertain that the survey included the NYT Editorial Board)

 

“We don’t see a broad-based buildup in leverage.”

“Asset prices generally do not appear to be out of line with traditional metrics.”

                                                                                                                 – Testimony, Janet Yellen, February 11

“The shadows are growing in the corporate bond market as investors turn to derivatives. An increasingly illiquid cash bond market is behind the shift.”

                                                                                          – Financial Times, February 11

“Investors have been warned by Fitch that losses from the next leveraged default cycle may be significantly in excess of previous cycles.”

                        – Financial Times, February 14

* * * * *

Perspective

 

In what seems to be bureaucratic ritual, Yellen’s public statements may vary from her private comments. The Fed head is not going to holler “Fire” in the equivalent of a crowded theatre. Nevertheless, we think the Fed chair is sincere.

Pity.

Perhaps her info on developing strains in the credit markets and asset valuations is a month or so behind the action.

Yesterday’s hit to the bond market was accompanied by the comment that traders had read the latest Fed minutes and realized that “they” did not know what they were talking about.

These pages have been hammering central banking for decades. Quite likely the treasury market was poised for change and the utterance by the Fed became the catalyst. Whatever, it is constructive criticism of an agency whose sole purpose is to provide unlimited funding for another experiment in unlimited government.

In Ukraine the “Cold War” between the governing classes and the ruled is turning to physical rebellion. Hopefully, this does not become a civil war. It need not as all the folks want is self-government. More links with Europe would be a step towards freedom. Ooops, we have referred to the seat of Euro-government as “Moscow on the Maastrich”. Perhaps the natural movement for freedom in Ukraine could spread to the rest of Europe. Maybe even to Democrat-controlled states and cities in America.

The violence in Kiev is spreading to other Ukrainian cities and it reminds of the Prague Spring uprising in 1968 and of the Hungarian uprising in 1956.

Political violence in Europe in the 1920s and into the early 1930s was between national socialists and international socialists. Each was dedicated to authoritarian central planning.

The conflict in Ukraine is vastly different – it is between authoritarians and those who value freedom. The latter were successful in bringing down the Berlin Wall in 1989 and today’s movement should eventually win.

Another reform movement could sweep the political world.

In the financial markets it would include profound criticism of the Federal Reserve System.

Credit Markets

 

At the first of the month, the bond future reached resistance at the 134 level, which was the high in November. The surge was enough to drive the Daily RSI to 75, which compares to the momentum of 73 reached with the bond high in May.

This surge was to vulnerability and all that was needed was a “news” hit. The catalyst was the Fed minutes, and the reversal was associated with reversals in stocks, lowergrade bonds, copper, gold and silver.

HYG (high-yield) and investment-grade (LQD) accomplished Outside Reversals. Liquidity, indeed, is diminishing. Essentially, this was from new highs on a move that has not had a significant correction since the “mini-panic” in June.

Long treasuries have been correcting and the 50-Day ma (about 130) should provide support. 

Credit spreads (JNK:TLT) led recent uncertainties in peaking at the end of December and taking out the 50-Day a week later. Then it plunged to the 200-Day which was enough to prompt the rebound. Now it is attempting to test the 50-Day line from below.

Emerging bond spreads (EMB:TLT) plunged to below the 200-Day and bounced back to that level and has been struggling. At 1.02 now, falling below 1.01 would resume the decline. The “high” or maximum narrowing was reached at the end of December.

Of interest, is that the initial hit looks quite like the reversal in June 2008.

We are keeping in mind that when troubles start in lesser exchanges they eventually hit the financial centre. We are also keeping in mind the unprecedented recklessness by the senior central banks in arbitrary pursuit of perfection.

Commodities

 

The rotation into commodities has been working well.

For some, such as coffee, the rally has been spectacular. Bottoming in November coffee led the play and has become, well, over-caffeinated.

The price was 1.01 in November and it took two months to rally 19 cents – yesterday’s gain was 19 cents – to 1.73. The Weekly RSI jumped to 81 which is a snick off of that reached at the top of the bull market in April 2011.

Clearly a remarkable short squeeze. Wonder if it includes “fair trade” coffee?

In November we mentioned that one of the coffee ETFs was JO, which seems an appropriate way to play the opportunities. The short squeeze is massive and the spike up will be followed by a spike down. Will it reverse this week, or next? Who knows.

Natural gas suffered a paradigm shift as it crashed from 13.69 in 2008 to 1.90 in 2012. The initial rally made it to 3.50 in early 2013 and the correction was to 3.13 in August. Obviously, natgas is in a huge “weather” rally. However, the Weekly RSI is as high as reached in 2008 and the price is at the resistance level of 6.11.

Crude’s action has been strong enough to drive the Daily RSI to 73, which compares to 75 reached with the brisk rally to the 110 level last summer.

Yesterday’s “Peak Oil” study was essentially written a week ago and being very longterm allowed seasonal room for the top. This week’s action in hot commodities suggests it may be sooner than later.

Base metals (GYX) rallied from 330 to 362 in early January and fell to 331. This is a good test of the low and the advance has made it to 346.

Agricultural prices (GKX) became very oversold at 340 in January and jumped to 375 yesterday. Of interest is that the Daily RSI got to 79, which compares to 83 reached with the spectacular drought rally of 2012.

Sometimes various markets can explode in March-April and we have referred to the phenomenon as the “Silly Season”. This seems to be happening, perhaps somewhat early.

In some examples the “rotation” has been fabulous and the spike up will be followed by a spike down. Then stability.

The rally in base metals was good and the one for agriculturals has been very good. A setback to stability seems likely.

In 2011 our “Momentum Peak Forecaster” called for a surge in speculation to complete and be followed by a cyclical bear. The high was 370.

The key low for the CRB was 272 in November and this was tested in early January at 272. The rally to 301, yesterday, was outstanding. The Daily RSI has clocked a huge swing from 22 to 85, which is quite like the drought rally of 2012.

The CRB could decline to the 275 level and trade in a range for most of the year.

Link to February 21, 2014 Bob Hoye interview on TalkDigitalNetwork.com:

http://talkdigitalnetwork.com/2014/02/gold-and-commodities-advance-strongly/

Screen Shot 2014-02-27 at 3.37.51 PM

– Deflated by the CPI, margin debt exceeds levels reached in 2007 and in 2000.

– It took some five years for margin debt to peak in the Tech Bubble of 2000.

– It took some five years for margin debt to peak in the Great Bubble of 2007.

– Although the latest posting is for December, it has been five years since margin debt was at a cyclical low.

– Margin debt is close to a cyclical high.

 

PIVOTAL EVENTS 

BOB HOYE, INSTITUTIONAL ADVISORS

E-MAIL bhoye.institutionaladvisors@telus.net

WEBSITE: www.institutionaladvisors.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Get in Front: Sector Rotation Underway Now

Rotations come and they go, typically lasting between six and nine months. Rotation is to stocks what location is to real estate. You have to be aware that diversified investment managers are always looking at their portfolio weightings to increase their position in sectors and industry groups that are outperforming the market and decreasing their weightings in positions that are underperforming. This is how the active manager seeks alpha. Traders will never want to be in underperforming areas and will seek out returns where they can best be found. So, rotations come and go, and we can clearly see over the past month that a rotation is occurring in commodities.

The last rotation I talked about was in May of last year, when I wrote, “Industrials and the Return of Alpha”. At that point, I talked about the rotation out of non-cyclical stocks and into cyclical stocks. After a brief lull, leading economic indicators were turning back up again at that time. Stocks were discounting this improvement, and in the second half of 2013, we saw some of the best GDP increases for this country since 2011. Cyclical stocks are still working, especially late-stage cyclical stocks now in energy and materials.

Before talking about the commodity rotation, a little history lesson on the top in commodities so that you, the reader, can understand the relationships that drive commodity prices, because everything is interrelated – currencies are related to economic growth and monetary policy, which influence supply and demand of imports and exports, which, in turn, drive commodity prices.

Commodities have been hated, under-loved, and under-owned over the past couple of years. Ever since Chinese stocks topped in April of 2011, the CRB index (a commodity index) topped and so began a two-year correction.

China-and-Europe-1

At that point in time, the U.S. dollar staged a major reversal in trend due to the end of  the Federal Reserve bank’s second purchase program involving Treasuries, as well as instability in the European financial markets. The European Sovereign Debt Crisis drove investments back into the U.S. financial markets, supporting a rise in the dollar. So, the top in commodities didn’t just correspond to a top in Chinese stocks, but also the end of QE 2.0 in June of that year. Precious metals, energy stocks, and other commodities were bought before QE 2 was announced in 2010 to play the reflation trade – and it was a trade that was faded just before QE2 ended.

Dollar-2011

That’s enough of the history lesson. The importance of the history of the top in commodities is the catalysts of monetary policy and a foreign financial crisis that drove our currency higher. Additionally, the peak in Chinese economic expansion was being discounted in Chinese stocks. As China was and is a major buyer of commodities, this affected demand and price of commodities.

There is a rotation happening now, as I mentioned last week, wherein gold and many commodities are staging a relief rally. The possibility of a long-term bottom is high because many have broken long-term downtrends. Sentiment is changing, as I showed in the Commitment of Traders report for gold futures and options contracts. This is also the case for natural gas, oil, coffee, cotton, and more. Hogs and cattle are already in uptrends when large traders started increasing their position last summer. Here are some charts that show the price charts and the net position from the Commitment of Traders report over the last few years. Note the significant change in the last two months for large traders’ net options and futures positions on softs, metals, grains, and energy.

coffee

natgas

gold-1

Corn

cotton

 

Is there a fundamental backdrop to an increase in commodity prices? The dollar hasn’t started a new downtrend. In fact, it’s trading in a range with no clear direction right now between 80 and 81.50 on the dollar index (not trade-weighted). The direction of the dollar depends a lot on the euro as well as the yen. The dollar fell in the third quarter last year as the euro rallied. In truth, the dollar has been trading within a range for 5 years. Before that, it was in a downtrend from 2002 to 2008, corresponding to the biggest bullish run in gold and other commodities since the 1970s.

We got the Federal Reserve Minutes for the January meeting yesterday. In the minutes, did the Fed appear to want to ease more? Is there going to be a new plan to increase inflation up to the 2% target? No. Rather, there was a heated debate on whether “it might be appropriate to increase the federal funds rate relatively soon.” In addition, it was probably the Fed hawks that indicated it would be appropriate to raise rates “before the middle of the year”. One could argue that near 0% interest rates, any rise would be “removal of accommodation” back towards the average Fed Funds rate level; but, technically, it is tightening policy to raise rates.

In addition, the Fed showed no inclination to delay the tapering of purchases despite recent weather-related weakness in the economy. The vote to taper in January was unanimous. I agree that the fed’s taper program isn’t “tightening”. It’s a removal of accommodation and return to “normal” monetary policy tools that focuses on forward guidance and the Fed Funds rate (which influences short-term rates); however, the Fed is still increasing its balance sheet every month, and, technically, that is easing.

All of this is just posturing by the Fed to manage the markets. It is important to understand policy, as it really does affect currencies, liquidity, and credit, all of which commodity traders watch to make bullish or bearish bets. As I showed above, commodities are undergoing a sentiment change as large investment managers and hedge funds increase their net position in commodities by increasing their long exposure or decreasing their short exposure. It’s clear on the charts that this is having a positive effect. Some, like myself, will call it a trade. Whether it becomes a long-term trend, we’ll have to look to commodity demand. Obviously, the winter is affecting crops, and so we see prices rising in softs and grains. Cattle and hogs have been on the rise since mid-last year. Possibly on the wealth-effect, but these animals need to be fed, too. If corn prices go up because of ethanol use or crops freezing, meat prices will follow. Eventually, weather changes, and is never a long-term catalyst. So, watch commodities like you would a speculative trade; however, the charts have put in what looks to be the recipe for a long-term bottom, which we didn’t see last year.

Looking at other asset classes, oil broke out above $100/barrel this week. Technically, crude has completed a double-bottom with a price objective near $107.50 and resistance near last year’s high around $110. Oil stocks are breaking out of 2-year long consolidations like service companies: Nabors Industries (NBR), Basic Energy Services (BAS), and Baker Hughes (BHI), as well as in natural gas and oil producers like Southwestern Energy (SWN), Ultra Petroleum (UPL), Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ), and many more. Many of the material companies are also showing long-term bottom conditions. I’ve even started looking at coal companies again for the first time in two years, but I still think they have more time to go.

Chemical companies, aluminum companies, steel, cement, precious metals, and diversified mining stocks are all beginning to look interesting again. These companies do well when the market believes the market cycle and economic cycle are in full recovery mode. As consumer discretionary and industrials performed last year, the next to perform are typically materials and energy.

sector-rotation-model

So there you have it: rotation comes and it goes. Right now, it’s clear that a rotation is happening. Just when I thought it was a done-deal that financials would be the best performers with a widening yield curve, a winter season comes and slows down economic activity, putting pressure on long-term yields. So, this trade has been put on hold, and a relief rally has begun in commodities. Watch for the rotation and don’t be caught unawares!

Screen Shot 2014-02-28 at 9.17.56 AM

 

Putin, Ukraine, World War III & Einstein’s Warning

UnknownAlbert Einstein“I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones”

Today the top trends forecaster in the world spoke with King World News about Putin, Ukraine, World War II and Albert Einstein’s warning.  Below is what Gerald Celente, founder of Trends Research and the man considered to be the top trends forecaster in the world, had to say in this remarkable interview.

 Celente:  “When you read the headlines, ‘Putin Puts Forces On Alert,’ you should take them seriously.  As I see it, this is just one more intervention by the United States and the European Union into a country and destabilizing it with ‘no exit strategy.’….

….continue reading the Gerald Celente interview HERE 

Gartman: Natural Gas Could Easily Spike To $10….

With Producers Unable To Hedge.

Gold is now above $1,330 and setting a pattern of short consolidations up against overhead resistance before breaking through and moving higher. This seems to contradict the popular opinion that gold should be sold and funds invested in equity markets.

In 2013, the hope that the economic recovery would gain traction in the U.S. caused a persistent trend of selling gold from U.S. based gold Exchange traded Funds. In April 2013, after Goldman Sachs forecast a heavy fall in the gold price, together with their clients and J.P. Morgan Chase, they unloaded around 400 tonnes of physical gold into the market in short time. The gold price buckled as a result. It pulled back to $1,180. It recovered over $1,200 over time in the face of many forecasts that it would fall to $1,000 an ounce. During the rest of the year the persistent heavy selling from Gold Exchange Traded Funds amounted to 880 tonnes by the end of the year. Institutions sold gold from these funds to turn to what appeared to be a far better prospect of profits. How do we know that it was financial institutions that were sellers? Because it was at the creation of these gold ETFs that allowed financial institutions to buy gold almost directly at cheap normal brokerage rates. Before that, they could not own gold bullion. With the gold ETF issuing shares against purchases of gold bullion, suddenly this market was opened to them. The tonnage sold through the year was around 20 to 30 tonnes a week.

In total, the U.S. supplied around 1,300 tonnes over the course of 2013. With total newly-mined gold supply at 2,969 tonnes and recycled gold supply at 1,371 tonnes, totaling 4,340, the additional 30% supply from the U.S. took supply up to 5,640 tonnes.

But at the end of 2013, the supply from the U.S. slowed to a trickle and looks like drying up now. While the focus of U.S. investors in the gold market has been switching out of gold and the expectation it would fall further in price, most overlooked the fact that these funds would have a finite amount of gold to sell. Many investors in these funds are very long-term holders and will not contemplate selling their gold. The profit-seekers appear to have completed their sales now, and we’re seeing U.S. investors starting to buy gold back into these funds. The conclusion is that we’re very close to if not at the point where the gold market has lost a 1,300 tonnes line of supply -that is huge for any market. This fact alone is changing the structure of the gold market and taking the gold price back to the uptrend.

Please note that we haven’t mentioned what’s happening on the demand side and what’s expected to happen on that side in the near future. In future articles, we will look at these reasons and why the gold market has changed to the positive and will stay there.

 

Subscribe – www.GoldForecaster.com

                www.SilverForecaster.com

Legal Notice / Disclaimer

This document is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment.  Gold Forecaster – Global Watch / Julian D. W. Phillips / Peter Spina, have based this document on information obtained from sources it believes to be reliable but which it has not independently verified; Gold Forecaster – Global Watch / Julian D. W. Phillips / Peter Spina make no guarantee, representation or warranty and accepts no responsibility or liability as to its accuracy or completeness. Expressions of opinion are those of Gold Forecaster – Global Watch / Julian D. W. Phillips / Peter Spina only and are subject to change without notice. Gold Forecaster – Global Watch / Julian D. W. Phillips / Peter Spina assume no warranty, liability or guarantee for the current relevance, correctness or completeness of any information provided within this Report and will not be held liable for the consequence of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained herein or any omission. Furthermore, we assume no liability for any direct or indirect loss or damage or, in particular, for lost profit, which you may incur as a result of the use and existence of the information, provided within this Report.