Stock market continue its momentum from yesterday but struggled to climb. More weak comments from Fed Chair nominee Janet Yellen suggested that she would likely see QE continue for a while to help the US economy get back up on its feet.

QE liquidity has been one of the main forces driving the stock rally over the past year and today was…

Read Full Report: http://www.thegoldandoilguy.com/articles/etf-trading-strategies/

Ed Note: Very good, clear video 

Chris Vermeulen 

Sotheby’s auctioned a 59.60-carat pink diamond for a record staggering $83 million. As for art, an Andy Warhol painting recently sold for a breathtaking $105 million. If you were impressed by that, then you should know the all-time record for the sale of any work of art took place this November at an astonishing $142.4 million. 

While the mainstream media says this is just the super-wealthy pushing their weight around in these markets in order to buy trophies, this is actually a much larger push by the wealthy to get out of fiat paper currencies and into hard assets.  This is very similar to what the Chinese are doing. 

From the highly respected Godfather Richard Russell, 89 years old and still writing every day:

“The Dow crept up higher, moving ever closer to the melt-up that I’ve been predicting.  Yesterday’s Wall Street Journal carried a front-page story about retail buyers coming optimistically into the market again.  I expect the retail entrance to the market to reach flood tide buy-in sometime within the next year.  

Thus I believe we are approaching an historic period where funds travel from institutional hands to the retail public. 

The gold base continues to enlarge, and pessimism toward gold is comparable to that which you see at a bear market bottom.  In the meantime, bullion creeps imperceptibly higher.  China is clearly on a new path which will result in a bulging population and a pull-back on its imports. 

The big picture for the US is “under-inflation” and underemployment.  Neither suggests a taper in QE.  In the meantime, smart money is buying tangibles. This can be seen in towering prices for art at recent auctions.”

Last week I penned an article titled, Gold Bear to End with a Bang. For those of you who prefer video, here is my analysis on video. I warn of the dangerous short-term downside potential in Gold that could mark the end to this bear market. Thus far, this analysis has been on track and has served to protect subscriber portfolios in recent days and weeks.

Sadly, this analysis did not sit too well with “Ranting” Andy Hoffman, marketing man and manipulation guru extraordinaire at precious metals dealer Miles Franklin. Rather than critique my analysis, he resorted to personal attacks in a lengthy rant. When someone attacks you personally, it’s probably because you are right. Moreover, he didn’t even read the entire article because he made numerous errors in reference to its content. Before I get to the larger point, let me correct some of his errors.

First of all, he assumes I’m implying that the gold stocks would not decline given a decline in the price of Gold. This is totally absurd. I noted: There is very strong support sitting right below the summer lows. Here is that same chart which shows the downside potential to that major support.

Secondly, he posted only one chart from my article while neglecting not only the other two important charts that show the pattern but also my conclusion. He compares my A-B-C labeling to the Aden Sisters’ pattern of which there is no relation whatsoever.

Third, he mocks the 1976 comparison which is quite foolish in my opinion. In a previous article I noted the several comparisons between today in 1976.

Instead of carefully reading the entire article and considering my analysis, he resorted to attacking me personally and professionally. He tried to denigrate me professionally by mocking my Chartered Market Technician designation and calling me a “two-bit” technician. If that were the case then how did I anticipate the June bottom and big rebound here and here or the top in commodities in 2011and the big decline in Silver in 2011? Surely I’ve made some bad calls but the reality is technical analysis works fine. It fails when the analyst has the wrong interpretation. And by the way, I’m one of only a few legitimately credentialed technical analysts in the gold community.

Furthermore, Hoffman claims that I don’t have my readers interests at heart and am leading them to slaughter. Are you serious? Its disgusting and disingenuous to claim that I don’t have my readers interest at heart. I’m alerting them about the potential for a serious decline. This guy was jamming Silver down people’s throats above $40/oz and he has the gall to call out someone else for making an honest prediction?

Hoffman goes on to mock newsletter writers as a group which I find ironic considering the only references Miles Franklin has (as to its credibility as a dealer) are newsletter writers! Also, according to its website, part of Miles Franklin’s philosophy is integrity. Yet, to attack someone personally and their professional credentials for no sound reason shows that its front man does not represent the company’s philosophy.

Honestly, it’s not surprising. Hoffman and the gold bug conspiracy loving charlatans have made a complete mockery of precious metals and the gold community. As the bear market has persisted these folks have shown no humility and become more fanatical in their already outlandish and ridiculous views.

The bigger the decline, the greater the manipulation they say while raising their already extreme future price targets. The more US equities outperform, the more grandiose the headlines become about the world ending and markets collapsing. Gold goes up, they are right. Gold goes down, they weren’t wrong. It was manipulation. How convenient for these guys. They never lose!

What is hilarious is this group has a double standard with technical analysis. Anytime I post an article with a really bullish chart pattern, the conspiracy brigade will quickly utilize it to its advantage. If my opinion is to the contrary, then they trot out the manipulated market line like a trained monkey.

Not once publicly or to subscribers have I ever blamed manipulation for my own mistakes and failures. It is a loser attitude and prevents growth as a trader or investor. Learning from mistakes is what makes you better in anything.

It’s absolutely pathetic how much Hoffman and his ilk use this excuse to cover up their failed forecasts and pumping of the metals at much higher prices. This whining about manipulation never made anyone one single cent. Do you ever hear money managers or fund managers blame their problems on manipulation? Does anyone actually believe a cartel is naked shorting mining stocks? “Honey I have to get to work early today, we really need to knock down the mining stocks.”

I stick by my forecast and am confident in its outcome. This sector is headed for trouble in the near term but it is likely to be the end of the bear market. There will be a huge and fantastic rebound. When I provide charts showing how much the metals and stocks can rebound, Hoffman and others are free to use them to promote their views. In the meantime, do yourself a favor and tune out the nonsense and anyone who isn’t going to help you make money. I’d be honored if you wanted to learn more about my premium service in which we focus on the gold and silver stocks which will outperform dramatically.

Jordan Roy-Byrne, CMT

Jordan@TheDailyGold.com

• It’s a cycle…it’s a business fluctuation… no, it’s a K-wave!
• Concerns about stunted growth continue…
• Plus, Marc Faber on the problem we faced… the people who caused it… and what to expect going forward…

Ed Note: If you are in a hurry, go down to the 9th paragraph on “K Waves” for a really important quick understanding of where we are in the cycle of Boom & Bust. 

Doubts about long-term growth continue…

“Unless Washington does everything right,” said Bluford Putnam to Reuters this morning, “and that’s just not going to happen — the U.S. is a 2% economy now.” Mr. Putnam is a chief U.S. economist at CME Group and a former economist at the New York Federal Reserve Bank. He isn’t alone in his pessimism, either.

Yesterday morning, the NFIB Small Business Optimism Index numbers were released for October. For what it’s worth, the index, which attempts to measure small businesses’ economic outlook, was down over 2 percentage points, indicating growing pessimism. The index was down in September too… both months’ decline were pinned on the partial shutdown last month. 

Meanwhile, the Chicago Fed National Activity Index — a monthly attempt to take the economy’s pulse — was flat. At the same time, consumer sales data last week were conflicted. The ICSC-Goldman report showed an increase, while the Redbook showed a decrease. In a word, the data is more confusing than helpful. Even when the numbers are clear… they’re often soon contradicted by other data. But that hasn’t stopped the Fed from throwing out optimistic predictions — especially for future U.S. growth.

In September, the Fed predicted 3% GDP growth for 2014… and 3.5% by 2015. “We are seeing continuing positive signs about momentum going forward,” said San Francisco Federal Reserve President John Williams last week, whatever that means. 

“This sense that real GDP growth is going to pick up soon — I’m very skeptical about that,” reposted Jeffrey Lacker from the other coast, earlier this month. Mr. Lacker is the president of the Richmond Federal Reserve Bank. “I know it’s a popular forecast,” he admitted, “but I’m skeptical. I see 2% growth ahead.”

Still, the modern fixation on short-term growth at all costs we discussed yesterday continues. In the past, we said, you could coax economic growth with a little government spending, debt and inflation. Now that doesn’t seem to work as well… and it hasn’t been for a lack of trying.

In 2010, a year after the Fed started its massive asset purchases, they forecast that GDP would have risen between 3.5-4.5% by 2012. As 2012 approached, however, the Fed trimmed their forecast to 2.2-2.7%. Sadly, 2012 growth ended up being just 2%. Let’s hope they have better luck with their new forecast.

Cycles happen, we noted yesterday. Try as you might, there’s no way to make the market go all up or all down. It will always ebb and flow between the two. The Kondratiev waves (pronounced Kon-DRA-tee-eff) we mentioned, or K-Waves for short, are one interesting lens to analyze these ups and downs through. 

We’ve written about K-waves in these pages before, but if you’ve never heard of them, they try to explain economic cycles over 50-60 years. The theory has been popularized by breaking the phases of the cycle into seasons — spring, summer, autumn and winter.

In the spring, business activity and employment start to pick up. As they do, consumers start to feel more confident about the economy. At the same time, consumer prices, stocks prices, credit and interest rates start to gradually increase. By the end of spring, the stock market’s peaked. That’s summer’s cue.

Summer is driven by a large inflation of the money supply. Consumers feel very good about the economy. As such, gold and real estate prices start to rise quickly along with interest rates. Stocks have also come down from their spring peak, until they bottom out — ushering in the autumn.

In the autumn, monetary and fiscal policies become even more loose, fueling a massive bull market in stocks. You would describe the environment as euphoric. Despite the monetary policy, the rate of price inflation falls, while gold enters a downturn. People start to take on way too much debt, but are confident because stock and real estate prices have created a wealth effect. Around the time that gold bottoms out, the dreaded winter has arrived.

The Kondratiev winter is economic hell on earth… but a natural step in the process. Stocks enter a massive bull market proportional to the size of the bull market that begot it. There are defaults and bankruptcies, bank crises, a credit crunch, a currency crisis as deflation runs its course through the economy. The price of gold rises.

According to the framework — we’re in a Kondratiev winter right now. Though there are some obvious differences between what we just described and what you see happening around you. That’s probably because this theory was made in the 1920s, when the entire globe wasn’t run on fiat currencies. Stay tuned for more on that tomorrow…

Even still, you might ask, is there any particular reason that cycles have to be 50 or 60 years long? 

Not as far as we can tell. But we don’t think that means K-waves are a useless way to look at the world, either. As Mike Shedlock, editor of Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis wrote of K-Waves in these pages back in 2006, “Is ‘cycle’ even the right word? Would ‘business fluctuation’ be better? Then again, ‘What’s in a name? that which we call a rose/ By any other name would smell as sweet.'”

We’ll pick up the discussion, tomorrow. If you want to weigh in, message us at: peter@dailyreckoning.com Until then, we pass the baton to Dr. Marc Faber. In today’s episode of The Daily Reckoning, he discusses one of the enablers of the debt, spending and money printing that leads to a Kondratiev winter. 

Read on…

What is the Problem, and Who Caused It?

by Dr. Marc Faber

As H.L. Mencken opined, “The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, and intolerable.” 

It is no wonder that, according to a Gallup Poll conducted in early October, a record-low 14% of Americans thought that the country was headed in the right direction, down from 30% in September. That’s the biggest single-month drop in the poll since the shutdown of 1990. Some 78% think the country is on the wrong track.

Some readers will, of course, ask what this expose about the political future has to do with investments. It has nothing to do with what the stock market will do tomorrow, the day after tomorrow, or in the next three months. But it has a lot to do with the future of the US (and other Western democracies where socio-political conditions are hardly any better). 

I have written about the consequences of a dysfunctional political system elsewhere. In the May 2011 I explained how expansionary monetary policies had favored what Joseph Stiglitz called “the elite” at the expense of ordinary people by increasing the wealth and income of the “one percent” far more than that of the majority of the American people.

I also quoted at the time Alexander Fraser Tytler (1747–1813), who opined as follows: “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the Public Treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the Public Treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by dictatorship” (emphasis added). 

Later, Alexis de Tocqueville observed: “The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.”

To be fair to Mr. Obama, the government debt under his administration has expanded at a much slower pace in percentage terms than under the Reagan administration and the two Bush geniuses. In fact, as much as I hate to say this, Mr. Obama has been (or been forced to be) a fiscal conservative.

However, what 18th and 19th-century economists and social observers failed to observe is that democracies can also collapse over loose monetary policies. And in this respect, under the Obama administration, the Fed’s balance sheet has exploded. John Maynard Keynes got it 100% right when he wrote:

By a continuing process of inflation, Governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some… Those to whom the system brings windfalls… become “profiteers” who are the object of the hatred… The process of wealth getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery… Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose [emphasis added].

The Fed takes great pride in the fact that US household wealth has now exceeded the 2007 high. However, I was pleasantly surprised when I recently attended a presentation by Larry Lindsey, at my friend Gary Bahre’s New Hampshire estate. He unmistakably showed, based on the Fed’s own Survey of Consumer Finance and Flow of Funds, that the recovery in household wealth has been extremely uneven.

Readers should focus on the last column of Table 1, which depicts the change in household wealth between 2007 and 2013 by wealth percentile. As can be seen, the bottom 50% of the population is still down more than 40% in terms of their “wealth” from the 2007 high. (Lindsey is a rather level-headed former Member of the Board of the Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in which capacity he served between 1991 and 1997.)

Besides the uneven recovery of household wealth among different wealth groups, a closer look at consumer credit, which is now at a record level, is also revealing. Furthermore, consumer credit as a percentage of disposable personal income is almost at the pre-crisis high. But what I found most interesting is how different income and wealth groups adjusted their outstanding total debt (including consumer credit, mortgage debt, etc.) following the crisis. 

Larry Lindsey showed us a table — again based on the Fed’s own Survey of Consumer Finance and Flow of Funds data — which depicts total debt increases and decreases (in US$ billions) among these different income and wealth groups. I find it remarkable that the lower 40% of income recipients and the lower 50% of wealth owners actually increased their debts meaningfully post-2007. In other words, approximately 50% of Americans in the lower income and wealth groups who are both voters and consumers would seem to be more indebted than ever. A fair assumption is also that these people form the majority of the government’s social benefits recipients.

Now, since these lower income and wealth groups increased their debts post-2007 and enjoyed higher social benefits, they were also to some extent supporting the economy and corporate profits. But what about the future? 

Entitlements are unlikely to expand much further as a percentage of GDP, and these lower-income recipients’ higher debts are likely to become a headwind for consumer spending. Simply put, in my opinion, it is most unlikely that US economic growth will surprise on the upside in the next few years. 

It is more likely there will be negative surprises.

Regards,

Marc Faber
for The Daily Reckoning

[For Retirees: If you’re like many Americans who want to retire (or have already) you’re worried about running out of the money you’ve worked your entire adult life for… just when you need it most. And as Dr. Faber pointed out, it’s harder for average Americans to grow their wealth now more than ever before.

But luckily for you, we’ve recently uncovered an incredibly effective strategy that could allow you to make as much money as you need, within a month. We know, it sounds unlikely but the proof is right here. The strategy has been popular so far. In fact, we have under 200 spots left to learn about it. We don’t want you to miss out, so click here for details on this opportunity.]

Dr. Marc Faber is the editor of The Gloom, Boom and Doom Report.

[Re. Cancellation Request: On a side note, our publisher is making what could be the most bizarre request ever. If you still want to receive the Daily Reckoning each day, you should see what he has to say. Click here for his message.]