Timing & trends

A Permanent Plateau: Crypto Bubbles

As this analyst say’s “Most of the time, getting off the mountain is far more dangerous than the ascent”. For those who remember the tech crashes of 2000-2002 or the slump in 2007-2009, this article lays out the danger inherent in the latest bubble in crypto currencies. A quick look at the sophistication of the players immediately is chilling! – Robert Zurrer for Money Talks

iStock bitcoin 2014 03 24You think your facts are more valuable than my feelings. I’m tired of being told facts. Sometimes facts just don’t matter. Sometimes facts are not facts.” 

— Bobbie Sanders, Inaugural Attendee

One attendee said, “I think stock picking abilities are overrated. I’ve beaten the stock market for something like 6 years in a row. People in index funds are driving a VW while I’m in a Porsche” When asked how his returns fared versus the S&P, the investor said he really didn’t track numbers like that. 

— Shaun Rodriguez

The view from the top of bull markets is remarkably like that from the top of the Matterhorn. What begins in a slow ascent at the base becomes a near vertical cliff for the last quarter. Sitting at the apex one might be inclined to puff up a little bit about their climbing abilities. One thing climbers will tell you on a regular basis is that disaster usually happens when you lose that sense of risk. Studies show that 60-70% of accidents happen to climbers on the way down not on the way up. It’s often referred to as “hikers’ letdown”[1]. While the view from the top is great, the danger lies in getting cocky at the height of the climb.

Market Bubbles

I bring all this up because many investors are sitting smugly on top of their own investment Matterhorn – serenely looking down at those numbers that seem so small down below. If we follow our hiker’s advice, now is the time to utilize the most caution and avoid the 1000-foot fall into a market crevasse. Put another way, Ieyasu Tokugawa always said that after a victory one must tighten the helmet strap.

The funny things about market bubbles is you can’t put your finger on exactly when they start or even if you are in one at the time. Knowing you have been in one is a heckuva of a lot clearer. But I would proffer that in the later stages of a bubble there are some events that take place that really aren’t seen in less exuberant times. For instance:

 

  • At the height of the Japanese asset bubble in 1989, the value of the land underneath the Imperial Palace in Tokyo (roughly 280 acres) was worth the same as the entire acreage of California (roughly 100,000,000 acres).
  • Near the height of the technology bubble in 1999, there were 457 IPOs of which nearly 80% were technology companies. Of those, 117 doubled in price on their first day of trading.
  • In 1999, thirty of the top 50 stocks (by market size) on the Nasdaq exchange had prices that reflected estimated growth to be 35% for the next 50 years.

 

Cryptocurrencies: The Symptom or the Disease?

We all generally look back and wonder how we couldn’t see the bubble at the time. With 20/20 hindsight it looks so obvious. But we shouldn’t be so smug to think we can’t be fooled again. Take a look at some of the latest news surrounding cryptocurrencies.

 

  • Ripple (which owns XRP, a digital currency) rose to nearly $4 per share. This made its majority shareholder and CEO Chris Larsen’s net worth jump to roughly $60B – placing him number four on the Forbes 500 richest. The vast majority of this wealth has been generated over a period of roughly 180 days.
  • SkyPeople Juice International, a company that makes – wait for it, juice – renamed itself Future Fintech Group (NASDAQ:FTFT) and saw its stock jump by 280%.
  • Not to be outdone, Long Island Ice Tea (NASDAQ:LBCC) company changed its name to Long Blockchain and saw its share price jump by 600%. More than 15 million shares changed hands the day the name change was announced, compared with average daily volume of about 170,00 shares over the prior three months.
  • CNBC reports an ever-increasing amount of people are utilizing debt to purchase cryptocurrencies. In an interview Josh Fairfield says “People are maxing out their credit cards because they think it’s going to make them a lot of money,” said Fairfield. “They’ve been right enough that people are now making ever more risky investments in cryptocurrencies.”
  • Software developer Rishab Hegde launched a cryptocurrency he called Ponzicoin. The company described its offering as “the world’s first legitimate Ponzi scheme” and encouraged people to buy and then “shill this coin heavily to your family and friends like a fucking sociopath.” Owners of the company had to shut the site down after “things got crazy out of hand.

 

Watching the cryptocurrency craze sweep over Wall Street, Ben Carson wrote on his wonderful blog A Wealth of Common Sense, “Hundreds of billions of dollars in a currency have been created basically out of thin air over the past few months. This doesn’t seem normal.”

Indeed. It definitely doesn’t seem normal. Most of the aforementioned events lead me believe there is a great deal more speculation than investing in cryptocurrencies. But I’m not sure it stops there. With the major indices trading at levels not seen since the mid-1920s (!), one has to think long and hard whether stocks are currently in a bubble or not. Only one thing is certain: panics in cryptocurrencies, stocks, or tulip bulbs pop because of a lack of confidence. David Preiser says “Until 2008, people thought debt problems were confined to specific sectors. But when the bubble burst, ­trouble popped up in unexpected areas.” Financial complexity brings prosperity but also increased fragilitySince the Lehman collapse it’s been a long and slow recovery. But the underlying problem remains: The entire edifice is built on confidence, and that can evaporate pretty quickly. The next global crisis will stem from failure of confidence somewhere.” The recent drop in Bitcoin values would suggest many investors have lost confidence in their investments.

Conclusions

When I began writing this article, the town of Zermatt at the base of the Matterhorn was attempting to evacuate 13,000 tourists. The mountain received nearly 12 feet of snow in a matter of days triggering avalanche warnings. The obvious fear was the town would be swept away in an extraordinarily large avalanche. Thankfully it didn’t happen, but that didn’t mean officials didn’t take it seriously and prepare for the worst. If you are sitting atop your own investing Matterhorn be prepared for a bumpy descent down. Remember most climbers die on the way down not the way up. Ask any investor in technology stocks in 2000-2002 or financial stocks in 2007-2009 and most remember the ride down not the ride up. It is truly time to tighten the helmet strap.

 

The ’87 Crash & Why the most-recent selloff was just the beginning

 

With more than $300 billion managed by trend-following hedge funds who can sell in an instant & furiously with computerized systems, the potential for a crash as bad or worse than 1987 exists now. Simon Black clearly explains the danger – Robert Zurrer for Money Talks 

DJI-Scenario-2018-Crash-1

On October 19, 1987, the Dow experienced its biggest one-day percentage loss in history – plunging 22.6%. 

It was “Black Monday.” The selloff was so fast and so severe, nothing else even comes close. 

The second worst percentage loss for the Dow was October 28, 1929 (also Black Monday) when the exchange fell 12.82%. It fell another 11.73% the next day (you guessed it… “Black Tuesday”). Then the Great Depression hit. 

A lot of people blame portfolio insurance for the market drop in 1987. 

Portfolio insurance was a popular product for large, institutional investors. It would “hedge” portfolios by selling short S&P 500 futures (which profit when the market falls) when stocks fall… the idea was, gains from selling the S&P futures would offset losses from falling stock prices.

If stocks fell more, the big investors would sell more futures. 

The problem with portfolio insurance is it was programmatic. And when the losses inevitably came, it created a feedback loop. Selling begot selling. 

But what initially ignited that selling back in 1987? 

Matt Maley is a former Salomon Brothers executive who was on the trading floor for Black Monday. He shared his thoughts with CNBC last year to mark the 30th anniversary of the event. 

Maley reminded us of the popularity of another strategy in those days – merger arbitrage. This was the time of Gordon Gekko, when corporate raiders would borrow tons of money – typically via high-yield bonds – to buy other firms. 

Merger arbitrage is simply buying shares of the takeover candidate and shorting shares of the acquiring firm. It’s a speculative strategy that tries to capture the spread between the time the deal is announced and when it (hopefully) closes.

The merger arb guys were already on edge because interest rates had been rising, making risky takeover deals even harder to complete. 

Then, out of nowhere, the House Ways and Means Committee introduced a takeover-tax bill on the evening of October 13 that, simply put, would repeal lots of tax breaks related to M&A activity.

The next day, Wednesday, shares of the takeover stocks plummeted and caught the already edgy traders off guard. The selling continued through Friday. Margin calls were triggered, forcing investors to sell even more. 

Then came Black Monday. 

After a turbulent week, mutual funds were facing massive redemptions. They were forced to start selling stock along with the merger arb guys… only in much larger size. 

The plummeting stock market triggered portfolio insurance to step in and start selling tons of futures short, which only worsened the selloff. 

That scared individual investors, who redeemed even more mutual fund shares. 

It was the feedback loop from hell. 

The point is… an unexpected bill from congress helped to push an already nervous market over the edge. 

And that brings us to today…

Earlier this month, the market dropped a very speedy 10% from its all-time high.

The selloff occurred because higher-than-expected wage growth stoked inflation fears. Higher inflation means the Fed may have to raise interest rates sooner than expected. All else equal, higher interest rates mean lower stock prices. 

And this panicked selling was based only on the fear of higher interest rates

To be fair, this market has gone nowhere but up since 2010. And volatility has scraped along the bottom that entire time. People have been lulled into this false sense of security that the stock market is a safe place that guarantees healthy returns. 

In short, the market doesn’t know what to do with negative inputs today… much less some really bad news. 

And, just like in 1987, there is a massive amount of programmatic trading taking place. Only today, brokers don’t have to pick up the phone to place a sell order when a certain price level is breached. 

Instead, we have supercomputers that trade at lightning fast speeds and process market information almost instantaneously. The automatic selling – or buying, for that matter – happens quickly. The feedback loop has sped up exponentially. 

That’s paired with more and more money that has flowed into backward-looking strategies that only work during times of low to no volatility. But, as we saw earlier this month, these strategies are utterly useless when the environment changes. 

Take volatility targeting for example… it’s when portfolio managers change allocations based on volatility. Coming into the recent shock, with volatility near record lows, these funds were as long as they could possibly be. 

That strategy had worked great for years as the market steadily rose higher. 

But when the selloff started on February 5, the VIX jumped 116% in one day (the largest move ever). And the volatility targeting crowd ran for cover, selling potentially hundreds of billions of dollars in equities. 

People have also been betting outright against volatility, which again, has been a profitable strategy for years. The VelocityShares Daily Inverse VIX Short-Term ETN (XIV), which moves inversely to the VIX, was one of the most popular tools for this.

But, when the VIX jumped 116% in a day, that fund lost about 95% of its value. Then XIV announced it would liquidate (the fund had $1.8 billion at its peak). Investors were wiped out. 

And it wasn’t just individual investors using this strategy… Even pension funds and sovereign wealth funds were getting in on the action as a way to generate income, which is totally absurd. These are supposed to be the safest and most conservative investors around. 

In addition to all of this money chasing volatility-linked strategies, we’ve also seen a massive amount of money flow into passive strategies (which buy indexes regardless of price or value)… a lot of that money has been in the form of exchange-traded funds (ETFs). 

But trillions of dollars are now deployed in this value-agnostic strategy, which means people are allocating capital simply because the trend is up. More than that, it’s in the form of highly liquid ETFs… so these investors, who don’t have high conviction in the first place, can quickly dump their position when the tides turn. 

Finally, there’s more than $300 billion managed by trend-following hedge funds. And their computers sell furiously on the way down. 

So all of this money has been invested on the premise that volatility won’t return to the market. The Volatility Index (VIX) had its biggest one-day move ever this month and investors panicked. 

But that’s just a taste of what’s to come. Imagine the selling we’ll see when there’s actually bad news.

 

To your freedom, 

Signature

Simon Black,
Founder, SovereignMan.com

Jack Crooks: The Next Big 8 Year Bull Market

The 3 charts below tell the story: Jack Crooks makes a powerful argument that the US Dollar has entered into a long-term bear market cycle which will trigger a massive BIG move in sold out commodities for the next 8 years – Robert Zurrer for Money Talks

Monday 19 February 2018

CURRENCY CURRENTS

Quotable

“There are as many styles of beauty as there are visions of happiness.”

                                                                                           –Stendhal (aka Marie-Henri Beyle)

Commentary & Analysis

Path of the dollar = Path of commodities? 

It’s not easy trying to forecast future prices from chart patterns; nor is it any easier to do so no matter how much fundamental information you possess, or believe you possess (see Frédéric Bastiat’s famous essay: “What is seen and what is not seen”). Said forecasting difficulties prove the axiom, so succinctly stated by the late great Mark Douglas: “Every moment in the market is unique.”

That being said, because decision-making and forecasting skills of the average human have not changed much since the beginning of time; i.e. we continue to see similar reactions across a fractal time frame which shows up as price patterns; albeit some differences which may be the result of high frequency trading a la algos. (As an aside, it seems despite individual’s attaining no better skill in forecasting, they have attained much higher confidence-levels. We can thank the dramatic increase in access to technology—producing vast amounts of data—for the spike in confidence levels. But, arguably, this fact has led to even less critical thought across the body of players who make up this thing called a market. And it may be a contributing factor for the next major market debacle.)

From that summary, I share one premise and two thoughts about market price action derived from chart patterns I watch day in and day out:

Given a certain level of mastery with chart patterns (defined by watching, thinking, and acting on price action over several years in real markets using real money), they do provide an edge which if applied judicially will increase the probability of success (albeit, the same argument may be applied to fundamental mastery). The degree to which chart patterns increase one’s probability will vary dramatically and can change dramatically as the market environment itself changes. So. I think it best to use the phrase: “Over time one can gain a slight edge using chart patterns as a forecasting tool.”

Keep in mind, it is that slight edge which builds and nourishes casino’s and race tracks.

The dollar path and the correlated commodities path.

1. I suspect the dollar has entered a long-term bear market cycle (first chart below). This decline will be measured in years (approximately seven to eight years) and should carry the dollar to fresh lows. But in the process of this long-term downtrend we will likely see a major multi- month rally in the dollar (second chart below) before we enter the big one; defined as the third wave down (past dollar cycles are usually not straight lines and consists of what is known as “tests” of the trend to wrong-foot market players.tself changes. So. I think it best to use the phrase: “Over time one can gain a slight edge using chart patterns as a forecasting tool.”
Keep in mind, it is that slight edge which builds and nourishes casino’s and race tracks.

Larger Chart 

jcdollar

Weekly Dollar Index: Cycles (global macro era’s defined)..the red arrows on the chart represent “tests” of the new trend. Note: We didn’t get a test during the “Punish Japan” era as defined (the Plaza Accord worked); and the last red arrow is a forecast. So far, no test since the fall in the US dollar began back in January 2017.

Larger Chart

 

jcdxy

2. There seems a tight negative correlation has developed between the US dollar index and commodities index (Thomson/Reuters). I have again noted the macro environment during this negatively correlated trend moves in the dollar and commodities. Thus, if one expects the US dollar to stage a rally before dropping to new lows, one should also expect we will see a better long-term buying opportunity in commodities.

US Dollar Index vs Thomson/Reuters Commodities Index Weekly: Note the tight negative correlation; i.e. as the dollar falls commodities rise, and vice versa. I have noted four macro environments where this correlation seems tight:

1) China Symbiotic period 2000-2007;
2) Credit Crunch 2007-2008/9;
3) QE Reflation 2009-2011 (a false start as the real economy never responded); 4) New Sheriff in Town aka President Trump most likely wants a weak dollar.

Larger Chart

jccomm

So, if the dollar is now in another bear market cycle, commodities should do very well indeed. Long-term buy and hold players will likely be quite happy in a few years owning things like wheat, soybeans, and platinum. The question is, from a trading time-frame perspective: Will there be yet another better opportunity to buy commodities? I think so.

Jack Crooks, President,
Black Swan Capital
jcrooks@blackswantrading.com
www.blackswantrading.com 772-349-6883/ Twitter: bswancap 

 

Victor Adair: The Market is Walking on Eggshells

Victor went into the crash short, covered and watched the market rally for a week. In this Live From the Trading Desk Victor has a strong opinion on what’s happening now in the Stock Market, Gold & the US Dollar – Robert Zurrer for Money Talks

….also Michael interviews Timer’s Digest #1 in 2017 Stephen Todd Feb 17th

hqdefault

The Top 3 Articles of the Week

game-has-changed1. Peril Danger Warning! Greg Weldon on Feb 10th 2018

   by Michael Campbell

A word to the wise – big name analyst, Greg Weldon issues a major warning for investors. Hint: the game’s changed. 

….continue HERE

2. Peter Grandich: Blip or Warning Shot

Must read: A report from someone who shorted this market and covered it right on the bottom February 9th. That is one hell of a trade.

….read it all HERE

3. Key Change That Nobody Talks About

Last week, everyone focused on the stock market sell-off. Reasonably enough, given the pace of the declines. But the analysts failed to pay enough attention to the very important shift. That change may be more important than Trump’s victory in the presidential election.

…read more HERE